Commons:Deletion requests/2024/02/04

Sorry, this SVG file is solely a source for re-utilization, editing or printing purposes. Please do not use this graphic within Wikipedia articles! MediaWiki isn't able to render this image correctly. Some details may be missing or look wrong. When you include the image in a Wikipedia or any other Wikimedia project site's page, you may want to use the other file, until the support increases.

File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04.png

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Ege619 (talk) 00:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ankara A2 Ankaray Hattı Logosu.png[edit]

File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04.svg is a vector version of this file.

Error: No SVG image by that name exists. Please make sure to use the correct format: {{Vector version available|new image name}}.

File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04 → File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04.svg

For more information, see Help:SVG.

In other languages

Alemannisch ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ British English ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Frysk ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Ido ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ Scots ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ vèneto ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ нохчийн ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ татарча/tatarça ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ தமிழ் ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

New SVG image

Ege619 (talk) 00:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ankara A1 Ankaray Hattı Logosu.png[edit]

File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04.svg is a vector version of this file.

Error: No SVG image by that name exists. Please make sure to use the correct format: {{Vector version available|new image name}}.

File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04 → File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04.svg

For more information, see Help:SVG.

In other languages

Alemannisch ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ British English ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Frysk ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Ido ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ Scots ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ vèneto ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ нохчийн ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ татарча/tatarça ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ தமிழ் ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

New SVG image

Ege619 (talk) 00:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Keçiören Teleferiği Logo.png[edit]

File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04.svg is a vector version of this file.

Error: No SVG image by that name exists. Please make sure to use the correct format: {{Vector version available|new image name}}.

File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04 → File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04.svg

For more information, see Help:SVG.

In other languages

Alemannisch ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ British English ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Frysk ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Ido ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ Scots ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ vèneto ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ нохчийн ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ татарча/tatarça ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ தமிழ் ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

New SVG image

Ege619 (talk) 00:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ankara F1 Funicular Line Symbol.svg[edit]

Sorry, this SVG file is solely a source for re-utilization, editing or printing purposes. Please do not use this graphic within Wikipedia articles! MediaWiki isn't able to render this image correctly. Some details may be missing or look wrong. When you include the image in a Wikipedia or any other Wikimedia project site's page, you may want to use the other file, until the support increases.

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/02/04

File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04.png

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Ege619 (talk) 00:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ankara F1 füniküleri.png[edit]

Sorry, this SVG file is solely a source for re-utilization, editing or printing purposes. Please do not use this graphic within Wikipedia articles! MediaWiki isn't able to render this image correctly. Some details may be missing or look wrong. When you include the image in a Wikipedia or any other Wikimedia project site's page, you may want to use the other file, until the support increases.

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/02/04

File:Deletion requests/2024/02/04.png

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Ege619 (talk) 00:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep Please stop these incorrect requests. PNG files aren't deleted just because SVG variants exist. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ethylmagnesium bromide.png[edit]

Unused PNG file superseded by visually-identical SVG version. Alhadis (talk) 00:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cevat Dereli.jpg[edit]

The painter died in 1989, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MaviKuş.jpg[edit]

The painter is alive, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MezarTaşları.jpg[edit]

The painter died in 1994, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nesetgünal.jpg[edit]

File:NesetGünal2.jpg

The painter died in 2012, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Zekai Ormancı.jpg[edit]

The painter died in 2018, and his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:GLOBOdeMatiasPerez1.jpg[edit]

The picture shown doesn't shows Matias Perez, the person is another one, Joaquín de la Cantolla y Rico, according to several sources, like this one. Tajotep (talk) 00:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep We rename, not delete! --RAN (talk) 05:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep, just fix the file information. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File information has been updated per Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia photo description. Can rename once DR is done. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:985rnbforlou.png[edit]

No longer used anywhere; purported logo for a likely-nonexistent radio station created in connection to now-deleted articles and drafts on the English Wikipedia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pempidine.png[edit]

Unused PNG file superseded by SVG version, identical save for the presence of margins around image's contents. Not distinct enough to merit existing as a separate copy. Alhadis (talk) 01:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rendition of Chiang Mai Municipality's border.png[edit]

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 01:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Chiang Mai City Borders.jpg[edit]

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 01:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Balıkların Dansı.jpg[edit]

The painter is alive, and her paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kris Tiffany Janson.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 02:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bird of prey concept II.jpg[edit]

I think that this is a derivative work of this model, which was created by Boeing internally c. 1992-1998. Unfortunately, that means that the model is copyrighted by Boeing in light of COM:HIRTLE, and I don't think we can keep this on Commons owing to that fact. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Cây-柏-trước-sân (talk · contribs)[edit]

Files with either vague claims of own work or source not identifying the image as being free.

Spinixster (talk) 02:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2011-Singer-Porsche-911.jpg[edit]

Flickr page is not the source - the file description says as much. From https://www.reddit.com/r/wallpapers/comments/4ljyos/2011_singer_porsche_911/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2015-Singer-Porsche911-Targa.jpg[edit]

Flickr uploader is likely not the creator. Previously published at https://carbuzz.com/news/singer-designed-porsche-911-makes-an-appearance-in-monterey Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Reimu Hakurei Minna no Kisekae 2 laughing.png[edit]

Reimu is not freely licensed, irregardless of ZUN’s high tolerance for fanwork Dronebogus (talk) 02:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hm, perhaps I had overestimated her genericity as far as character design goes. It does seem like Hakurei Shrine employs a different uniform for their resident category:Miko than others do. Arlo James Barnes 08:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Yuta xv (talk · contribs)[edit]

Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful

A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The subject has a high amount of pre ejeculate in his constitution.

Also, the subject is 18 years old, which I find useful as an adolescent penis.

At particular photograph, the images about pre ejeculate are overwhelmingly images of the tip of the penis if it is a soft penis, which I find useful. Yuta xv (talk) 05:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete we don’t need to illustrate every possible variation in the penis Dronebogus (talk) 07:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Main-qimg-6033b009f522de90a48aa63c6514fa28.jpg[edit]

No permission from Quora, no indication of free license A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And ugly. 186.172.226.162 11:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Chiong Family 2023.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 04:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Miss Universe Philippines - Cagayan de Oro.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 04:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Miss Universe Philippines - Cebu.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 04:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Miss Iloilo.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 04:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Miss Palawan Universe.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 04:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Miss Universe Philippines - Aklan.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 04:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Miss Universe Philippines - Albay.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 04:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Miss Universe Philippines - Batangas.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Miss Universe Philippines - Bohol.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Miss Universe Philippines - Bukidnon.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Miss Republika ng Pilipinas - Europe.jpg[edit]

no adequate evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder EdrianJustine (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:सोमवंशी क्षत्रिय (वाडवळ) Somvanshi Kshtriya vadval & History of South Kokan.pdf[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 04:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Berdenov Ruslan.jpg[edit]

Questionable copyright status. It is very likely that this user does not actually own this image, as they don't even have a userpage. Getting a picture from the copyright-free Majilis website would be so much simpler. Malik Nursultan B (talk) 04:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete. Appears on https://ulysmedia.kz/analitika/18426-maining-i-spisok-forbes-kto-v-kazakhstane-zanimaetsia-modernizatsiei-energetiki/ credited to "Facebook". Omphalographer (talk) 05:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sámi mythology shaman drum Samisk mytologi schamantrumma 112.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Mewa767 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: waste. I don't see that as a valid rationale to speedy-delete a redirect. Jmabel ! talk 04:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:RqGenerator.png[edit]

COM:NOTHOST, out of scope funplussmart (talk) 04:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sylheti kuuchi.jpg[edit]

No permission. Copied from https://eatreadandcook.blogspot.com/2016/08/sylheti-chicken-curry.html Rocky Masum (talk) 05:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by BerlinEagle (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: various inaccurate and/or nonsensical flags.

Omphalographer (talk) 05:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sikh Empire Flag.jpg[edit]

Out of scope: per description, "anachronistic flag [...] There is no evidence in historical paintings or texts that such a flag with this text was ever used". Omphalographer (talk) 05:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alternate Election 00'.tif[edit]

Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 06:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Rockefeller Win of 1968.png[edit]

Fictional and out of scope, Rockefeller was not the Republican presidential nominee in 1968 N Panama 84534 06:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tone Lōc.jpg[edit]

Photo is obviously still under copyright by Entertainment Weekly. Binksternet (talk) 06:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:PD-American Samoa[edit]

All of these files (non of which were actually created in American Samoa, but anyway) were first published online (which probably makes them US works, especially due to being posted on the US-hosted Facebook; otherwise, Japan could be the country of origin under the Berne Convention) by authors (presumably) from American Samoa.

American Samoans are US nationals. Despite whatever lack of copyright protections their works may have in American Samoa itself (which is dubious, since common law copyright would apply if not preempted), their works are CERTAINLY protected by statutory copyright in (the rest of) the United States. Works by US nationals from American Samoa are not in the public domain automatically. These files must all be deleted.

D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 07:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nope. What you say about the American Samoan Copyright is finally just guessing. Only because you claim to know the truth alone, makes this not the truth. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is zero guesswork here. American Samoans are 100% US non-citizen nationals by birth. See en:US National. US federal copyright law defines the works of US nationals, wherever they may be made or published, as US works subject to federal statutory copyright. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 16:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:42a984 cf765a0bb2d34e7ea9bed795374f4e9e~mv2.webp[edit]

Copyrighted image per this article 132.71.132.46 08:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alam-Atiqoh-Ganjar.jpg[edit]

Not stated that this photo is Creative Commons licence, besides that it takes from political party website. Urang Kamang (talk) 08:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mio Imada (今田美桜)2021.jpg[edit]

NoFoP-Japan. The source file may be considered deminimis, but when enlarged, it is clearly not. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 08:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Tranhoangnam4320 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unused non-educational files.

NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 09:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Tranhoangnam4320 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unused non-educational files.

NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 09:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Tranhoangnam4320 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unused non-educational files.

NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 09:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Uploads by Sonuseloper[edit]

Unused files with poor quality and unclear purpose. Out of Scope. --funplussmart (talk) 04:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Khujedekho (talk · contribs)[edit]

Small size, no metadata. Unlikely to be own shots.

0x0a (talk) 09:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep not sure that low resolution and lack of metadata are sufficient reasons to believe that these are copyright violations. --Headlock0225 (talk) 09:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User uploaded some copyvios. So I suspect the others. But if these are indeed uploader's own works, then (s)he should upload files with metadata or the original full-size files to prove it. 0x0a (talk) 17:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Aurocazamales (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, music albums and books covers

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:МАКАРОВ Г.И.jpg[edit]

This person died in 2003, for sure it is not own work done in 2024 Leokand (talk) 09:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Derby Tomhills.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: Logo of an artist, F10, Out of scope CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Devi Saraswati.png[edit]

This is an art and not sure about the author, and possible to copyvio. Before flickr, it appeared in many onlince sources in cluding https://maduraidiary.blogspot.com/2007/10/happy-saraswatiayudha-puja.html ~AntanO4task (talk) 10:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lakshmi Ganesha Saraswati the holy trinity.jpg[edit]

This is an art and not sure about the author, and possible to copyvio. Before flickr, it appeared in many onlince sources in cluding https://divinehindugodwallpapers.blogspot.com/2011/11/lord-ganesha.html ~AntanO4task (talk) 10:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wanneroo Bushfire at night.jpg[edit]

It seem as copyvio due to lack of EXIF details and comment (image deails) clearly says "Screenshot" ~AntanO4task (talk) 10:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PatcaArt.png[edit]

No smoking here 186.172.76.210 10:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Moza Help Argamani.png[edit]

This kind of campaign collage is out of scope for the project. Also no proof the uploader is the copyright holder of the two original images used to compose this. MarioGom (talk) 11:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Moza Help Bibas.png[edit]

This kind of campaign collage is out of scope for the project. Also no proof the uploader is the copyright holder of the two original images used to compose this. MarioGom (talk) 11:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Moza bint nasser.png[edit]

Low resolution image, previously published at https://twitter.com/LantosSwettK/status/1753437550763446353 No proof the uploader is the copyright holder. MarioGom (talk) 11:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:تک درخت.webp[edit]

The watermark suggests the photographer is "Mohammad Heidariyan". We would need a VRT ticket from the photographer. 0x0a (talk) 11:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Määttä Jasmin vaalikuva 2023.jpg[edit]

Non-notable person, out of scope. 188.123.231.64 11:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

~~Keep~~: In use. --Achim55 (talk) 21:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Achim55, these false positive edits in de.wiki were made by bots after this vandalistic edit in Wikidata. All these activities are about Jasmin (d:Q4178347), and not about this non-notable person depicted here. --188.123.231.64 14:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I doubt 'own work' as it seems to be a professional shot made for an election, also previously in use on tiktok and facebook, so I change to

Delete. fi:Jasmin Määttä has been deleted per lack of notability. --Achim55 (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Duncan Grant tollrajza 1919-ből - E. M. Forster.jpg[edit]

Duncan Grant died in 1978. Copyrigted artwork. Regasterios (talk) 11:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by FahmadiAhmadi33 (talk · contribs)[edit]

small size, no educational purpouse, not used.

0x0a (talk) 11:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Лука (Войно-Ясенецкий).jpg[edit]

No source of publishing that will be old enough. Looks like the image was published in late XX century and this may be copyrighted. No source of the author's death. PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Лука Войно-Ясенецкий (икона).jpg[edit]

Lacks license from the heirs of Юрий Витальевич Пифтанкин (†2005). PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lyka crimen.jpg[edit]

This work was created in 2013. Lacks license from the painter. PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:La Grave.jpg[edit]

Je suis l'auteur et j'aimerais la supprimer. Ky Lauren (talk) 11:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Serdar Soydan.jpg[edit]

Lisansa uygunluğu tartışmalıdır. Dosya kaynağı belirsizdir. Serbest lisansa sahip olduğu konusunda kanıt yoktur Emreculha (talk) 11:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Serdar Soydan'ın bizzat kendisi tarafından onaylanan ve resmi ajansı olarak bu görsel konusunda tereddüt dahi edilemez. 2024 yerel seçimlerinde kullanılan görselidir. Tüm mersinde şu anda görebilirsiniz. HalukKyvz (talk) 07:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Me (yvanyblog).jpg[edit]

Personal, and should be deleted. Alexeyevitch (talk) 11:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mustafa-tutuk.jpg[edit]

Twitter resimleri serbest lisans olarak kabul edilmemektedir Emreculha (talk) 12:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mustafa-tutuk (cropped).jpg[edit]

Twitter resimleri serbest lisans olarak kabul edilmemektedir Emreculha (talk) 12:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep Bonjour, cette demande est complétement injustifiée. La photo publiée le 23 octobre 2020 sur tribunedelyon.fr avec la mention (DR) a été récupérée sur Wikimedia Commons où elle avait été déposée le 30 juin 2017 sous licence Creative Commons 4.0 par Jean-Luc Hauser. Il suffit de lire l'historique du fichier. Jean-Luc Hauser avait entrepris de photographier entre le 28 juin et le 4 juillet 2017 la quasi-totalité des nouveaux députés et de publier leurs photos sur Wikimedia Commons pour permettre d'illustrer leurs articles respectifs sur Wikipédia. Voir ici les contributions de Jean-Luc Hauser qu'il convient de remercier pour son travail.

La mention (DR) a été apposée par précaution parce que le rédacteur de l'article de la Tribune de Lyon n'en était pas l'auteur, puisqu'il l'avait récupérée sur Wikipédia. Le fichier original est libre de droits, et il peut être partagé et modifié. Le demande de destruction déposée par GPZ Anomymous est sans fondement et doit être retirée au plus vite. Cordialement, Patrub01 (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep Je confirme, la publication sur Commons date de 2017 et dans la Tribune, de 2020. Kirham (talk) 15:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bugs-Bunny-Builders-logo.png[edit]

Above COM:TOO 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 12:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sedat yalcin the goat.jpg[edit]

the uploader listed "skibidi toilet ai" as the author + lack of a proper description 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 13:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy delete per nominator: It seems probably vandalism and out of scope. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 13:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason des Gasnier.jpg[edit]

erreur de couleur, sinople est vert simple et non vert fonçé. VVarnarivs (talk) 20:01, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion in my opinion. A new version could be uploaded instead. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:33, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Blason des Gasnier.jpg[edit]

Erreur de couleur, c'est en vert clair et non foncé. VVarnarivs (talk) 13:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dr Mahnaz Moallem.png[edit]

Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Donald P. Ely.png[edit]

Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by JanneMyntt (talk · contribs)[edit]

Derivative works of copyrighted magazines

Antti T. Leppänen (talk) 13:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Nitabee1 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: From Facebook

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alfred Gislason 02.jpg[edit]

Turandot 2001:9E8:E6AC:3C00:D8C6:89A5:849F:A892 13:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Without offering any reason for the deletion request, this request is invalid. --Kuebi (talk) 06:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Interview with Milinda Kodikara.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: Interviw with pictures, No indication of Creative Commons CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stevena.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of copyrighted advertisement Antti T. Leppänen (talk) 13:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Before hoi4 ww2.png[edit]

Ouf of scope: personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jeffrey Kessler Professional Headshot.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: the picture was already on the internet in 2020 as it used to be indicated on this website https://www.winston.com/en/insights-news/jeffrey-kessler-named-to-the-lawdragon-500-hall-of-fame https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=Jeffrey+Kessler&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.winston.com%2Fimages%2Fcontent%2F2%2F0%2Fv2%2F200252.jpg CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gefyra.jpg[edit]

The bridge in question was only built in 2011. As a result, and since there's no FOP in Greece, this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 13:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep. No evidence that Greek bridges are protected as architectural works and no mention of bridges at COM:FOP Greece. This seems like a functional piece of engineering to me and not a creative work (and more so than many bridges). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Jivan Giri (Actor) (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, Page of a newspaper, F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Akhand Bharat Orange.png[edit]

Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 13:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Plataforma Solar de Almería - Vista aérea.jpg[edit]

Small photo without metadata, not made from easily accessible place. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I am a worker and administrator of computer systems at the Almeria solar platform, this image was taken with a drone by us (PSA). Yesulm (talk) 09:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hôpital La Grave et pont St-Pierre.jpg[edit]

Je suis l'auteur et je souhaite supprimer ma photo KyLauren (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Hhelhenawy (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: A watermark from Ahmed Khaled on the picture

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Αγία Τριάδα Χολαργός Greece.jpg[edit]

The church in question was only built in the early 2000s. As a result, and since there's no FOP in Greece, this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 13:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Turkey Iranian woman.jpg[edit]

non-encyclopedic person and photo MarinaMann (talk) 13:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This picture is well in scope and can be used to show how oppressed Iranian women find an oasis of freedom in some neighboring countries like Armenia, Azerbaijan, and in this case Turkey. If you really think women in swimwear are non-encyclopedic then you should delete all the pictures of ordinary women in the relevant categories like Category:Women in bikinis etc. 186.172.142.238 18:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Periklisxolargos1.JPG[edit]

The statue in question was only erected in 2004. As a result, and since there's no FOP in Greece, this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 13:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Labor-Migration-in-the-Middle.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Nulp67 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: From Facebook

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Medhavi Skills University Training.jpg[edit]

also file:MSU Infrastructure.jpg
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 13:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mayo RM.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: A watermark with a copyright appears on the picture, From Google Images CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Robert Miller Head Shot.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Felix Augustinowski (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: The sources do not indicate a clear Creative Commons

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vb97.jpg[edit]

User admitted they are not the copyright holder( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&diff=prev&oldid=1203194517), no evidence of permission as claimed, taken from social media 331dot (talk) 13:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20240204 185557-ANIMATION.gif[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 13:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete crude personal pornography Dronebogus (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kreativ1.jpg[edit]

Old photo, not own work. Real source, real author and real license are needed. Unused, no categories, educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 13:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rino Gaetano, murales di Jorit.jpg[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The artwork was donated from the author to the city, the picture is taken from a public street and is made on a popular building FraPla (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kevin murray jonothan brown mural.jpg[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 14:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hosier Lane Melbourne-2.jpg[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 14:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think it falls under 2D "works of artistic craftmanship" and Wikipedia has been inconsistent regarding deletion requests on Australian murals. I think we should pending our judgement until we reassess the case of FOP in Australia, especially street art, and produce a consistent policy across all deletion requests.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama/AllRules#Australia

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/12#Concern_on_Australian_murals Kanzcech (talk) 02:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sans titre, ROA, 2013. (50331164436).jpg[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 14:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sans titre, ROA, 2013. (50330489353).jpg[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 14:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Water tank mural, Spotswood, Victoria.jpg[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 14:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Never thought of it as a work of art, just a local landmark, with no monetary value. If the author(s) could be found I doubt they'd object to relinquishing all rights except erasure/demolition. Doug butler (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pmep png logo.png[edit]

Possible copyvio: Logo of a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Photo de la sculpture It Owl de Stefan Rinck située sur la Place de l'hôtel de ville au Havre.jpg[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in France and the sculptor en:Stefan Rinck is still living. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:EGO Pôster Anti-Skate.jpg[edit]

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 14:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Battle of Clontarf mural.jpg[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Don't forget to also delete the redirect "File:Dublin (48139690767).jpg". Ww2censor (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Pablo Serrano1989 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: All the content comes from Eulen website, which does not indicate a clear Creative Commons status

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mural of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman.jpg[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Mural of poet Kazi Nazrul Islam and his wife Pramila.jpg[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mother Teresa Mural, Caritas Sylhet Regional Office.jpg[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:A wall painting at business faculty, Jahangirnagar University.jpg[edit]

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 14:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rothbard mes.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Maximilian Florian, Atelier.jpg[edit]

Missing permission for shown artwork (from de:Maximilian Florian, †1982), no FoP, no de minimis Wdwd (talk) 14:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Wdwd: in what country is this located? (For categorization of DR purposes.) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Most probably and according to the german wp article in Austria. Undelete in 2053 should be ok, category added.--Wdwd (talk) 08:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tujpreta nudela plado de Uni-President, fermita, 1.jpeg[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 14:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete – I had erroneously assumed that the chinese text on the packaging was a PD-textlogo and the picture of the noodles was a case of Commons:De_minimis. Thanks for pointing out COM:PACKAGE. – Renardo la vulpo (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by SayRuz (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: Different logos

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:RAC 12.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Artworks in Category:Maximilian Florian[edit]

Missing permission for shown artwork. Artist de:Maximilian Florian died 1982

Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photographs in Category:Maximilian Florian[edit]

Missing permission and information (author, date) for original photographs (COM:DW). Depicted person de:Maximilian Florian died 1982, so the photos can't be "own work".

Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:SAVE 20231119 022207.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Patiala Kingdom Map.jpg[edit]

The map was removed from en.wiki as heavily incorrect and, really, it has no source other than own work. Maybe the file is out of project scope . Taivo (talk) 14:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Agustinabakeoff.png[edit]

Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work, Seems to come from a TV show CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:مدير عام منظمة الصحة العالمية في تغريدة يشيد بمجهودات ولي العهد اثناء ازمة كورونا.png[edit]

Derivative work, screenshot. Taivo (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Három buborék.jpg[edit]

Unused low quality image of chemical reactions. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 14:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bester Chocolatier Deutschlands.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: On the internet since 2020 https://www.backexpo.de/nachrichten/backexpo/Callebaut-Advertorial-152 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Középen piruvát.jpg[edit]

Unused low quality image of chemical reactions. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 14:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, the image has 2 spelling errors ("PYRUVÁT" instead of "PIRUVÁT", "FOSZFOENOLPYRUVÁT" instead of "FOSZFOENOLPIRUVÁT"). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Laktát dehidrogenáz.jpg[edit]

Unused low quality image of chemical reactions tagged as {{BadJPG}}. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Oxaloacetate.jpg[edit]

Unused low quality chemical image (JPG). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Folyamat.jpg[edit]

Unused low quality image of chemical reactions. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:KO-Daehan Minguk-pronounce.ogg[edit]

Duplicate of File:Ko-Daehan Minguk-female.ogg. 165.155.164.43 15:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Piruvát kináz.jpg[edit]

Low quality image of chemical reactions. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Piruvát-karboxiláz.jpg[edit]

Unused low quality image of a chemical reaction. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:C3ee00069a-s8.gif[edit]

Low quality image of chemical reactions. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Knick Knack title.png[edit]

Copyright violation, screenshot of a non-free film. 165.155.164.43 15:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.155.164.43 (talk) 15:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:IUPAC-alcohol-2.jpg[edit]

Unused low quality chemical structure (bad JPG). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:A Bug's Life movie.png[edit]

Drawings of bugs clearly pass COM:TOO. 165.155.164.43 15:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sorsok.jpg[edit]

Unused low quality image (photo) of chemical reactions. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:“Snowman” madd of tires.png[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Turningred(2).png[edit]

Drawing of a red panda's head clearly passes COM:TOO. 165.155.164.43 15:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.155.164.43 (talk) 15:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Többfelé.jpg[edit]

Unused photograph of chemical reactions. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:BnL logo.svg[edit]

Inaccurate recreation, use File:Buy n Large Logo.png instead. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.155.164.43 (talk) 15:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is not a recreation; it is a new file in SVG format, which is superior to formats that use raster graphics. Additionally, I don't find it correct to upload a new version of the file in different formats. Therefore, uploading a new file is not only completely justifiable but also preferable in these cases. If a deletion has to occur, the file in PNG format is the one that should be deleted, not this one. − Allice Hunter ^(Hello!) 13:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Turningred(1).png[edit]

Drawing of a red panda's head clearly passes COM:TOO. 165.155.164.43 15:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.155.164.43 (talk) 15:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PNG direction road signs of Ireland[edit]

These PNG files, uploaded by myself, have now been superseded by SVG files, also uploaded by myself. --EthanL13 | talk 15:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hiring .png[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of company of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:TeenNick 2023 (Outline).png[edit]

Unofficial recreation, use File:TeenNick 2023 Outlined Logo.png instead. 165.155.164.43 15:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.155.164.43 (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Yazılım Tarihi.png[edit]

advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 15:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fernando Henriques.jpg[edit]

The metadata says the image was created on January 3, 2017, but in the article on Henriques, the caption in the infobox says circa 1950s. Something does not add up here. I also note that the image in question is the only contribution on the Commons by its uploader, whose user name matches the co-author of a book on the subject. Seems like the image may have come from the book, it may have been produced by someone else in the 1950s, and the author might have had permission to use it. Previous concerns about an incorrect license have not been addressed, leading me to think this image is copyright and should not be on the Commons. Flibirigit (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep The cutoff is 1954, every noob uses the default upload date. --RAN (talk) 19:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You query whether the tag on the photograph is correct as it is of Fernando Henriques (my father) in the 50s, but says it was taken in 2017. Well both claims are correct: it is a photograph of a photograph. The original has been in our family possession for about 70 years, the one submitted to Wikipedia was taken of the original one much more recently. I hope that clarifies the situation. Adrianhenriques (talk) 11:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That does not clarify who is the author of the orginal photograph, nor who owns the copyright or when it was actually taken. Flibirigit (talk) 03:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Acques-René Allard, picture of a start package, le Tortillard, petit train mécanique en OO.jpg[edit]

This is not a photograph, but a drawing, so the license tag used, {{PD-Switzerland-photo-non-individual-50-years}}, does not apply. It is said to be from ca. the 1950s, so it's probably still copyrighted. Unless it is shown in a convincing manner that the artwork is under a free license or in the public domain in both the US and the source country, the file should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 16:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:EugenLeuthold1957.jpg[edit]

Wahrscheinlich copyvio, Foto aus dem Jahr 1957, angeblich aber Eigenes Werk des Hochladers Lutheraner (talk) 16:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete The cutoff is 1954. --RAN (talk) 19:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Diese Fotografie ist frei zugänglich über die genannte Quelle [1]https://www.radiomuseum.org//forumdata/upload/Leuthold.pdf Mimi0815 (talk) 06:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Zoi!s 2023.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Joeren Gloe M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Politics In Chicago (396205907).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:5516 Bth Möhlstraße.1.jpg[edit]

Ich Elias Streib, Urheber des Bildes möchte es löschen weil ich dies eigentlich nicht hätte hochladen dürfen, da es auf Privatgelände geschossen wurde. Elias Streib (talk) 16:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Little Village Mural on Banco Popular (210744460).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ct wall off 18th street (559901958).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:New City Signage (2047390626).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:True public art (213979533).jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Raúl Alfonsín.jpg[edit]

Taken from Facebook, not evidence of being under stated license. Frodar (talk) 16:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:-i---i- (9226619659).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Britsol DSCF4688 (2749266859).jpg[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 16:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:三(三甲基硅基甲基)磷.png[edit]

原作者要求 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaolezhe (talk • contribs) 03:38, 3 February 2024‎ (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep, in use. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 16:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete. The usage is unrelated to the article. I have removed that usage and redraw the chemical structure, so there should be no more problem to delete this file by user request. --Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 13:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete. Not in use anymore. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Live.ON.png[edit]

we had trouble changing the png extension to svg Sbqnan99 (talk) 12:54, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Live.ON.png[edit]

svg version file has been uploaded, this file is no longer needed as it has the same values Sbqnan99 (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Scott-faw-1.jpg[edit]

Probable copyvio. Looks like it was taken by a photographer at an awards ceremony, unlikely to have been taken by the uploader as is claimed, no exif data. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Axillary Hair in Puberty.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 2001:16B8:663A:8A00:7153:893A:7E52:FF07 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <this image shows me, a not 18 year old who created this pic years ago. I uploaded it, but i dont know why. Its really embarrassing for me to have an image of me in the internet, when im not even 18. i dont want that. Please delete it.> — billinghurst sDrewth 12:39, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep The person is not identifiable and the image is used. Ankry (talk) 17:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete The nomination above is misleading. The logged-in uploader also edited the page three times (Special:Diff/579008863, Special:Diff/579074306, Special:Diff/579100155). The first time was to back up the anonymous speedy deletion nomination. The latter two times were to create new speedy deletion nominations, both of which stated that the uploader is a minor now, and certainly was when they uploaded this image. There is no evidence that the subject was an adult, or that there was any consent given, or that the image was taken in public; the image is a close up view of a body part not normally exposed to the public. Brianjd (talk) 13:37, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete. Inqilābī (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Image is in use and subject cannot be identified. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Axillary Hair in Puberty.jpg[edit]

The subject requested to be deleted, as under age person. IMO keeping this was a mistake. Yann (talk) 12:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just to be clear, even though the file was initially tagged by an IP, it was subsequently tagged multiple times by the uploader, who claimed to be a minor. I have detailed this in the previous DR.

On the other hand, the file remains in use at bs:Pazušna dlakavost. Brianjd (talk) 13:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: As stated in previous DR, person is not identitiable, and file is still in use. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Axillary Hair in Puberty.jpg[edit]

I created this photo when I was younger. So young, that I couldn’t decide if it was right. And I can tell you that it wasn’t. I know that if it’s once in the internet it will be there. But please delete it from commons. It makes me feel so unsafe.. I mean i don’t know what could be done.. please help me! And I didn’t know that after I post something I can’t delete it MYSELF. That follows me everyday and makes me feel so insecure. Pubertystuff (talk) 17:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Football Coach Willie Spears.jpg[edit]

MIssing proof of documented permission. 850Marcom (talk) 17:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ábra folyamat.jpg[edit]

Unused JPG image of chemical reactions. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 17:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete. Picasa metadata and the slight angle on everything suggests that this was scanned from a book, making it probably a copyvio. Omphalographer (talk) 03:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gorepore[edit]

Uploads from another account from the Jurisdrew sock farm. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Borepore[edit]

Uploads from another account from the Jurisdrew sock farm. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Itay the dogg.jpg[edit]

personal image, derogatory title, outside project scope Poliocretes (talk) 17:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Piruvát-dehidrogenáz komplex.jpg[edit]

Low quality (JPG) chemical reaction equation. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 17:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stanley Otto Hess.jpg[edit]

Duplicates a better (resized) file already uploaded for use on Wikipedia. MdN1631 (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Duplicates a better (resized) file already uploaded for use on Wikipedia. MdN1631 (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ickerott Block.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (Screenshot) M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:6722631 original.jpg[edit]

Grabbed from https://defence-blog.com/us-donates-37-mrap-vehicles-to-albania/ – original source unclear, maybe PD US Gov (Military), but definitely not own source Albinfo (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Eodalb.jpg[edit]

source unclear, but definitely not own work, see meta data and other uplaods by this user. and author in meta data is somebody from Canada, so probably not PD-US-Gov (military) Albinfo (talk) 18:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Romantics Of The Song Dil Diya Gallan From Film Tiger Zinda Hai.jpg[edit]

copyvio. Salman Khan and Katrina Kaif in Tiger Zinda Hai. https://sg.news.yahoo.com/tiger-zinda-hai-salman-khan-cant-stop-looking-at-082609299.html?guccounter=1 ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dess-Martin-Oxidation.png[edit]

Low-quality chemical reaction mechanism, pixelated, opaque (white) background & in small resolution. Replaced by File:Dess-Martin-Oxidation 2.svg as high-quality vector version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PCN Flag.png[edit]

reupload of deleted files: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Flag_PCN.svg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Flag_PCN.jpg PizzaKing13 (talk) 18:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This file has been uploaded from a public source in El Salvador and is in public domain. No need to request deletion. Albahas (talk) 01:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is no copyright violation since it is in a public domain. Albahas (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The tassili.jpg[edit]

low resolution image with DISSOLVE watermarks. unlikely to be own work. ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Overtheplacedude127 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Uploads for a fictional election sandbox page on enwiki (eg. File:VaSIau94RA6x8kBVIKPeMw.jpg is described there as the Liberal Party candidate for the year 2052). Personal fiction projects are out of COM:SCOPE, and the photographs may be copyvios and/or derivatives.

Belbury (talk) 18:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Desert of Algeria.jpg[edit]

File:اي نيوز.jpg[edit]

شعار قناة له حقوق Mohammed Qays (talk) 18:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:TheBlueJayPlayer.jpg[edit]

low quality selfie ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:4-Aminopentanal.png[edit]

Low-quality chemical structure with thin bonds, opaque (grey) background & not drawn according to MoS guidelines, but instead just copied from PubChem. Replaced by File:4-Aminopentanal-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Peta Wilayah kelola Desa Katu 2023.png[edit]

GoogleMap CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 19:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Theseis char1.jpg[edit]

source: https://www.deviantart.com/koyima/art/Pheve-Hi-Tech-Suit-147033829 ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Published on DeviantArt "Dec 17, 2009 by koyima". Uploaded to enwiki 18:17, 15 January 2014 as "own work" by DimitrisKo. Delete per COM:PCP. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Thiago Pereira Domingos.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Thisisthemostepicamazingthingeverever.jpg[edit]

bad high school photo, taken by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Total 2012 2.JPG[edit]

Chart is outdated, not in use and the title is unclear Trustable (talk) 19:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tahmineh Mohammadi.jpg[edit]

I have made a mistake about this image copy right attribution. Fateminasab (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AISHA - Helder (persfoto).jpg[edit]

Copyright? As source is given "publication" but nothing about the real source. Who was the photographer? It is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 20:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Carlos Villalobos Jr..jpg[edit]

Low resolution. Looks to be a photograph or screen shot of a video based on the black border. Likely copyright violation. William Graham (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Thumb IMG 7634b.jpg[edit]

Files uploaded by EDS2020 (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Thundermutt.jpg[edit]

Krypto the Superdog - Warner Bros. Animation, DC Comics ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Thés glacés de Lemoncha.jpg[edit]

Lemoncha advertisement https://melazic.com/la-vie-du-royaume/lemoncha-debarque-au-royaume/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tigan Barat.jpg[edit]

source: https://www.facebook.com/tiganbarat/photos/tigan-barat-adalah-paramkuning-asli-tanah-karo-100-bahan-bahan-murni-dari-tumbuh/316754072518634/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tikkanna somayaaji.jpg[edit]

web photo https://medium.com/@saitejasetlem/the-evolution-of-telugu-language-and-its-literature-789f7258ab3e, https://rvskmsc.blogspot.com/2013/03/httpramamohanchintablogspotin.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Timo de Winter.jpg[edit]

low qulity selfie by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Władysław Komar.jpg[edit]

No info about publication date and publicator in source page. 159.205.9.44 21:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The photo comes from documentation collected at the Institute of National Remembrance - it is mentioned in the source. This is a passport photo, it is not a work of art and it does not involve protection. W2k2 (talk) 21:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Liu Yan Ping in the wax.png[edit]

Personal picture, not in use Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Władysław Komar 1972.jpg[edit]

This photo was made in 1972 but we don't know when and where it was published. There isn't any information in source page (even archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20180825115442/http://sport.tvp.pl/7779182/sport.tvp.pl/479727/sport.tvp.pl/479727/australian-open#undefined) 159.205.9.44 21:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep. The sources [2] [3] say that the photo originates from the Polish Press Agency and was taken at the 1972 Olympics in Germany. Hence it is reasonable to assume that it was published in 1972 in Poland. I don't see any information on the web that would suggest otherwise. Materialscientist (talk) 04:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lyp.jpg[edit]

Personal picture, not in use Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of majeerteen sultanate.png[edit]

deviantart flag Wowzers122 (talk) 21:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Gabrieleclown (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: Personal fiction

Enyavar (talk) 21:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:TinaK 13.jpg[edit]

unliely to be own work. https://www.bunte.de/tv-show/ruth-moschner-jeden-tag-traenen-104513.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stefan Buhk.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Wildbild M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Mad Doctor (1933).webm[edit]

Per COM:CHARACTER, even though this film was not renewed, it is still a derivative of an earlier work (the Mickey Mouse character) and its distribution is still subject to the character's copyright. The Warner Bros v Avela ruling from 2011 confirmed that, and there was a person who was fined $500,000 for attempting to distribute cels of this very film (see http://articles.latimes.com/2008/aug/22/business/fi-mickey22/2 ) since it was still derivative of the still-copyrighted character. This could be undeleted in 2024 at the earliest, or perhaps 2029 (depends on if it is derivative of the Mickey Mouse character from Steamboat Willie, or if it also uses elements added by intermediate films which would still be under copyright). Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:01, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep The article of the LA Times says two things : (1) "the Disneys failed to renew copyright claims on that film" and (2) Brown was prohibited in 2008 to "market recreated animation cels" from that film. This should be related to the Warner Bros vs Avela litigation where "Warner Bros. contends that Avela has extracted images from the public domain materials and used them in new ways that infringe the copyrights in the associated films" [4]. I agree that it has been ruled "recreation" of cels is subject to the character's copyright, but the film itself is in the public domain. This may call for a warning on the use of the media file, such as 'beware the characters are copyrighted', but not for a deletion. From a broader perspective, this would not be the only case of a PD film incorporating non PD elements. — Racconish^📥 06:41, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The lack of copyright on the movie did not make the Mickey Mouse character public domain, just the new expression in the movie. If any parts of the movie (or cels, recreated or directly copied) are derivative of the character, then distribution is still controlled by the copyright of the character. Same issue as in Russell v. Price, where a movie was not renewed, but the play it was based on had been renewed, and thus distribution of the movie was still prohibited. The Warner Bros v Avela case reached the same conclusion with the Tom & Jerry reproductions. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The same is mentioned in this William Patry blog post; several middle episodes of the Andy Griffith Show were not renewed on time, but they were still ruled derivative of the character copyright established by the earlier (still-copyrighted) episodes, and could not be copied. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:42, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Yes and no. I agree with you the lack of copyright on the movie does not make the Mickey Mouse character public domain, but this is not what is at stake here. There is no more copyright on this film which has fallen in the public domain and the characters of the film are copyrighted. Hence it is right to say this film is in the public domain. But I agree it would be better to add a warning this does not imply an absence of copyright on the characters. — Racconish^📥 16:42, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - There is no more copyright on the additional expression added by the film; that is the only expression which the copyright notice covered (and therefore that the lack of renewal released to the public domain). To the extent that the film copies expression from the character (or earlier still-copyrighted works), it is still a derivative work, and is still subject to the copyright of the original (which as you say remains valid), and as such, cannot be distributed. We do not have a license for the underlying copyright. Courts have now ruled repeatedly (and the 1909 Copyright Act basically said the same) that the copyright status of a derivative work does not change in any way the copyright status of the underlying work, so that remains intact, and the film remains a derivative work of a still-existing copyright. Some have argued that it should dedicate to the public domain at least as much expression of the original as is seen, but that is not how courts have ruled. Courts have only ruled that it served to publish any elements of an unpublished underlying work, such that copyright could not be made infinite by using this argument with an unpublished underlying work (which used to never lose copyright), but with a published underlying work the copyright of the original remains and still applies to derivative works. The Warner Bros v Avela ruled that even exact copies of Tom & Jerry posters could not be used for similar reasons, since the posters were published after the character copyright was published, and though the posters did not have a copyright notice, it was only the small amount of additional expression in the posters (over and above the general depiction of the cartoon characters) which lost its copyright. The Russell vs Price decision was exactly the same -- there was a copyrighted play, and a derivative movie which was not renewed, but distribution of the movie was still illegal because it was still a derivative work (of the play). Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:55, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - The one thing from the Warner Bros v. Avela ruling which might be the issue here was on the Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind posters. In those cases, the posters were published before the movies, so they were not derivative of anything, and therefore those can indeed be copied. The character copyright was created by the movies themselves though, so any use of them which deviated from exact copies -- such as the addition of a line from the movie -- ran the risk of evoking the character themselves and becoming a derivative work of the copyrighted character. Exact copies were allowed because those posters were not derivative works; they predated the character copyright. The quote you gave above came from that section of the ruling. In the Tom & Jerry section though, all but one of the posters in question came after the character copyright, and therefore were inherently derivative works. We also held above that the characters of Tom and Jerry are not in the public domain. In addition, because the characters achieved copyright protection through the short films before all but the first movie poster entered the public domain, and the later movie posters necessarily exhibit those characters, even the use of any movie poster but the first requires Warner Bros.’s authorization. That is unfortunately the parallel situation here -- the Mad Doctor came after the copyrighted character was published, and is still a derivative work, and any use still requires Disney's authorization. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:13, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    - I have to point out the situation here is quite different from the Avela case, which concerned public domain publicity material of a copyrighted film. But if your point is the fact this film is in the public domain does not imply the characters are, I agree. Why don't we try to find a constructive consensus on the wording of a caveat to clarify the fact the characters are not in the public domain ? — Racconish^📥 21:55, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      - Because it's not just a caveat... copyright law gives the authors of underlying works control over derivative works. And the Mad Doctor film is a derivative work of the Mickey Mouse character. Or do you not think it is? All additional expression added by this film did become public domain, but that is not enough for us to distribute -- some expression is still copied from earlier Mickey Mouse films, and that expression did not become PD by the lack of renewal; it remains copyrighted. It's like a photo of a copyrighted sculpture where we have a license for the photo but not the sculpture. The face that the photo became PD before the sculpture doesn't change the derivative rights of the sculptor.
      - The part you quoted was the Warner Bros claim, but the actual ruling was a bit different (and for us, critically different). They ruled that Warner Bros didn't even need to allow straight copying of derivative works, even if copyright had lapsed on the secondary work. The court did say that their statement as you quoted above amounted for authorization for that one particular use for Avela for those posters -- i.e. that became the license, so Avela was not guilty of infringement for a couple of the uses in question -- but that does not apply for anyone other than Avela. Anyone else would still need authorization from Warner Bros to distribute even exact copies of the Tom & Jerry posters which were first published after the original short film. It was only works which were published before the character copyright was created which can be copied without authorization. That is the distinction in the ruling given in the part I quoted. The Pygmalion film was the same basic ruling -- even though the film itself was sort of "public domain" because its copyright was not renewed (just like Mad Doctor), it still wasn't really public domain since the author of the play still had a copyright on the underlying work, which was not affected by the movie going out of copyright, so distributing the film was still copyright infringement. Only part of the movie became PD, basically, and it's still not legal to distribute the whole thing. That to me is the exact situation here -- I'm sure there are many frames or even clips which don't involve Mickey Mouse, and as long as they only contain the new expression added by that film, those parts are probably OK. But any parts which involve the Mickey Mouse character are still derivative and still can't be copied. As the Patry article states, it's a situation where "public domain" really isn't "public domain". It kinda sucks, but there have been multiple court rulings at this point which say that, and I'm not aware of any court cases which went the other way. A derivative work, by definition, involves some expression copied from an earlier work combined with new expression. It is only the latter part which is covered by the copyright of the derivative work, and it is only that latter part which becomes public domain if that copyright lapses. The part which was copied from the earlier work remains copyrighted. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:09, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
        Carl, I do understand your concern, but I still disagree. Yes, according to section 7 of the 1909 act, the publication of Mad Doctor and afterwards its falling into the public domain did not affect prior copyrights on the characters and yes, this provision gave legal basis to forbid the publication of cels taken from that film after it has fallen in the public domain. But no, we cannot deny this film as a whole is above the threshold of originality and was entitled to copyright per the same text. We have to live with the fact it is an original work of art as a whole although it incorporates some preexisting elements such as the graphic identification of some characters in some cels. I therefore repeat my proposition to clarify in the 'permissions' section the fact that although this film has fallen into the public domain, some of its elements deriving from previous copyrighted works may still be protected. I suggest at this point we let other contributors express their point of view. — Racconish^📥 04:47, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
        Yes, it might be time for others to chime in. Most of what you say above is perfectly true... obviously Mad Doctor had a great deal of new copyrightable expression and that copyright expired after 28 years. The problem, as I see it, that the "elements deriving from previous copyrighted works" means we also need a license for those elements, just like any other derivative work. Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:03, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
        Fine. in the mean time, trying to clarify this not-so-clear matter, I have added a note to the file description. Feel free to improve the wording if you are inspired . — Racconish^📥 09:22, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete — I agree with Carl, when a film falls into the public domain due to lack of renewal this does not automatically also place any separately registered copyrighted works depicted in the movie into the public domain, only the new creative elements unique to the film become public domain. For example, imagine an artist sculpts a statue in 1928, registers its copyright, and puts the statue on display in his home. In 1933 a filmmaker, with the permission of the artist, creates a short film lovingly depicting the statue with a voice-over describing the features of the statue. If the filmmaker failed to renew the film's copyright, but the artist did renew the statue's copyright, can I start selling copies of the film without the permission of the artist? No, I can not. The film remains a derivative work of the copyrighted statue, even if the unique creative elements of the film have fallen into the public domain due to the lack of renewal. I could, however, sell copies of the audio track to the film, as that does not infringe upon the copyright to the statue. —RP88 (talk) 16:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted, mostly per RP88. For example, the photos have double copyright: of photographer and of author of depicted object. They both must be free to be suitable for Commons. Here the other (derivative work) has fallen into public domain, the first (of what is depicted) has not. You can argue, that the film is free: you can show and copy it without free of charge, yes, that's right. But derivative works from the film are not allowed, because Mickey Mouse is not in public domain. Commons does not allow files, where derivative works are prohibited. Taivo (talk) 07:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Undelete in 2027 due to Pluto character created in 1931. —holly {chat} 20:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Mad Doctor (1933).webm[edit]

Once again, the film features Pluto and must wait until either 2027 to be uploaded. See this deletion request. SDudley (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: Previously deleted. — Racconish ^💬 21:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Карта Малмыжского княжества.png[edit]

Suspected copyvio: Basemap unlikely to be own work (Yandex??); even if the slapped-on-top markers might be own work Enyavar (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Topkapı Palace Turkey - panoramio - Ufuk Önen (10).jpg[edit]

There are tons of images from the Topkapı palace. This one has low quality and lackness of educational purposes. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olik Mari (talk · contribs)[edit]

GoogleMaps CopyVio

Enyavar (talk) 14:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Olik Mari (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: Most appears to be personal fiction, others are possibly local fake-tivism/revanchism? Alert for admins: User seems to have engaged in inserting their hoax-uploads into various other articles in language versions, like in fi-WP. I'm less sure with ru-WP - please check the insertions carefully, if they are good-faith contributions please mark those symbols as not-to-delete

Enyavar (talk) 22:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Insurgency in Balochistan.svg[edit]

For starters what even is the source for this map? Everything used on wikipedia has to be sourced. Like what even is the red? Who is the blue and why do they control Machh and all that area? The only descripation is that the BLA is green but theres like no green on this map lol Wowzers122 (talk) 22:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Opposethat is very clearly a blue color. This isnt wikipedia this is Wikimedia. The source is https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/balochistan-bla-mach-city-pakistan-army-attack-forces-baloch-militants-terrorists-2495347-2024-01-30. Lukt64 (talk) 01:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:XCB-01.jpg[edit]

Allegedly inapproriate license assigned. Copyright violation. Hwi.padam (talk) 22:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rio de Janeiro mapa eleitoral falso FICCIONAL.png[edit]

Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 22:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Possible charity autonomous.jpg[edit]

May breach copyright. The Possible website 'Legal' page says "The texts of our blog posts and articles are released under a creative commons licence (please note that this does not relate to any of the images on our website or contained within any such posts or articles, just the text). Paul W (talk) 22:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I contacted Leo Murray of the charity Possible to enquire about the copyright status of this image and whether it could be used on Wikipedia. He confirmed this image was released under Creative Commons - his exact wording was:

"It’s Creative Commons so fine for Wikipedia!"

I can contact him on Monday to request something formal or to request their website T&Cs make an exemption if that is helpful? WhiskyFour (talk) 23:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The page hosting the photos has been updated with image license information:

https://www.wearepossible.org/latest-news/were-calling-on-councils-to-explore-a-car-free-transport-solution-for-hammersmith-bridge

|"All images on this page can be reused under the CC BY 4.0 license." WhiskyFour (talk) 12:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The New Foxy (talk · contribs)[edit]

looks like a stealth shot without consent. anyway commons have more and better photos of women in sports attire.

File:Chica en el gym con abdomen sexy.jpg

RZuo (talk) 15:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete Low quality, probably either personal image or copyvio. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 17:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete. Source link is obvious Flickrwashing. Omphalographer (talk) 17:43, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion; Flickr user clearly taking 3rd party photos and giving them false licenses (will add to Flickr user user blacklist). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The New Foxy (talk · contribs)[edit]

Violations of COM:De Minimis and COM:PACKAGING.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 18:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep neuro drink is simple shape The New Foxy (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

With the Neuro Drink, I am more concerned with the banner advertisement above the drink. (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by The New Foxy (talk · contribs)[edit]

These files contain copyrighted characters (or copyrighted versions of characters) and either violate COM:COSTUME or COM:FOP US.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 22:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete user is known for a history of copyright violations as well. SDudley (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Nlasheras (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: all appear to be personal images of no educational value, from user with little involvemt with any project.

Voice of Clam 23:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UndergroundErniePoster.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation, non-free poster of TV series. 165.155.164.43 23:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Example .png..jpg[edit]

صورة من الانترنت Mohammed Qays (talk) 23:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]