Commons:Deletion requests/2024/01/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

January 12[edit]

File:Monumento a Maria Remedios del Valle, Buenos Aires.png[edit]

not FoP for 3D reproductions in Argentina 190.193.245.242 03:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:9MKR logo.jpg[edit]

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:9MKR.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:United Nations Treaty Collection. Volume 3007. I-52241.pdf[edit]

The volume is copyrighted, so per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_Nations#cite_ref-RightsPermissions_1-0 should we have the authentic texts of this treaty in English, Russian and Ukrainian, but not French translation? Jusjih (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I mean to delete pages 15 and 16 with the French translations with uncertain translation license but to keep pages 1 to 14 with the authentic texts. Maybe keeping the page numbers of "Volume 3007" and "I-52241" is de minimis of a copyrighted volume? If so, this may become a textbook case on how to properly upload usable portions of copyrighted volumes of the United Nations Treaty Series.--Jusjih (talk) 22:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2024/International Team[edit]

adding redirect to website no need of local page. Authors request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiven2240 (talk • contribs) 06:47, 12 January 2024‎ (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Гутников Валентин Сергеевич.jpg[edit]

The image is scanned from a family archive Special:Diff/840739865. No information about the original photograph that was taken until 2005. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I edited the date of original photograph and its source (as I understood that why it was nominated for for deletion) 188.169.141.42 15:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:The Heart Truth 2013[edit]

These images were all uploaded by me. At first I thought the copyright holder of these images is the US government and might have hired the photographers. But I was probably wrong since the EXIF data of these images state otherwise and one of the images of this kind which was also uploaded by me was deleted for the same reason. Therefore, I think these should also be deleted. Syrus257 (talk) 12:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

1995 images from a Philippines' 1995 publication[edit]

Images from a 1995 publication are too recent for be PD. 1995 is less than 50 years. Copyright is still counting in Philippines until 2046. 193.146.182.175 13:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the honest request, But I honestly saying that the Photographs of Fidel Ramos and St. Pope John Paul II and some photographs from Corazon Aquino are been credited promptly by the Philippine Government as I mistakenly added PD-PH, I wasn’t sure for the correct PD Tag here on thoese all images this was all been filled correctly Bryant2000 (talk) 14:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Benoit Declercq - JV003.jpg[edit]

Copyright infringement (no portrait rights) HouseJo (talk) 15:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:SantiagoBovisio.pdf[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 16:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Buenas tardes. Escribí esta entrada porque en Wikipedia no hay biografía de Santiago Bovisio y su nombre aparece citado en por lo menos dos artículos. Los datos pueden verificarse en el libro de Fabiana Mastrángelo: "Santiago Bovisio, el Maestro de América". Si algo del formato no es correcto, pido la opción de corregirlo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariaJor (talk • contribs) 19:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wikimedia Commons no es el lugar correcto para subir un artículo en Wikipedia. Para más información, lee es:Ayuda:Tu primer artículo. Omphalographer (talk) 19:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:OutlineChapter.pdf[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I wanted to include it because it shows the scope of the OCT field. Technology, which clinical fields are the most relevant (most promise), and physics. In addition it shows a source for understanding how to do hypothesis driven basic science and clinical trials. The clinical trials chapter was written by clinical trials investigators at Boston Children's Hospital. OCTMGH (talk) 16:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As you've been told on your talk page on the English Wikipedia, this image is not an appropriate source for a Wikipedia article. The book which this outline was drawn from is a source, and can be cited by reference; your recreation of its table of contents with commentary on possible improvements is not a source. Omphalographer (talk) 18:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Princess Margaret Signature.jpeg[edit]

Per COM:SIG UK A1Cafel (talk) 16:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment: As discussed here and here, COM:SIG UK misstates the relevant law and the cited sources, and the user who wrote it no longer stands by it. A1Cafel appears to have nominated quite a number of signatures for deletion on this incorrect basis. He has been pinged several times about this issue, and it is disappointing that he has continued to nominate signatures for deletion without responding to the issues raised. In light of the above, it would seem appropriate for him to weigh in as to whether he believes the nominations are still appropriate. --Usernameunique (talk) 23:58, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UK-Royal-Signature Margaret.svg[edit]

Per COM:SIG UK A1Cafel (talk) 16:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment: As discussed here and here, COM:SIG UK misstates the relevant law and the cited sources, and the user who wrote it no longer stands by it. A1Cafel appears to have nominated quite a number of signatures for deletion on this incorrect basis. He has been pinged several times about this issue, and it is disappointing that he has continued to nominate signatures for deletion without responding to the issues raised. In light of the above, it would seem appropriate for him to weigh in as to whether he believes the nominations are still appropriate. --Usernameunique (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tesla Megapack.webp[edit]

This image is from a Tesla's filing with the SEC, and it should be copyrighted by Tesla. 0x0a (talk) 16:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC) Template:Voice files uploaded by User:RedAuburnReply[reply]

File:Discord style monocle avatar.svg[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Discord_(software), it was decided that the Discord logo is not freely licensed Nutshinou Talk! 17:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The SVG file is not the Discord logo but very similar, therefore I think the file counts as a freely licensed image. Is there a limit to how closely it can be in appearance, compared to the Discord logo?  Xan ✨ talk 17:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The logo itself is what's copyrighted, not just specific images of the logo. Modifying or recreating the logo doesn't create a new work independent of that copyright, just like drawing your own image of Donald Duck wouldn't create an image free of Disney's copyright on the character. Omphalographer (talk) 18:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Discord logo round.svg[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Discord_(software), it was decided that the Discord logo is not freely licensed Nutshinou Talk! 17:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mon seul ami.png[edit]

not uploader's own work. possible source: https://imall.com/product/Applicable-to-high-grade-wood-stick-crutch-walking-old-grandma-grandpa/Furniture-Outdoor/aliexpress.com/32760914895/568-3718164/en ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Discord logo.png[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Discord_(software), it was decided that the Discord logo is not freely licensed Imabathbomb (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Elazigataturkstadyum.jpg[edit]

Non-free work, all rights are reserved (https://stadyumlar.com/stadyumlar/elazg-ataturk-stadyumu) MarinaMann (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The image was used with all permissions. Harunstalay023 (talk) 18:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jamie Chung 2013 (original).jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by FozzieHey as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This doesn't seem like it falls under US government work. QTHCCAN (talk) 20:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@QTHCCAN: Thanks for pointing out that discussion, I was not aware of it. However there does seem to be some differences, I can't see any mention of a "work-for-hire" scheme or any reference to a site like Getty, unless I'm missing something here? FozzieHey (talk) 21:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 12:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jamie Chung 2013 (original).jpg[edit]

DAN & CORINA LECCA are the copyright holder according to the exif data, not the US government. Syrus257 (talk) 17:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete although these really should have been a bulked deletion request across all of SCD0392's uploads, not piecemeal like this. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I suggest to reopen this Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Heart_Truth_photos QTHCCAN (talk) 16:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Celine Dion Receives Order of Canada[edit]

This photo is a work of the Canadian government, NOT the US Government as the uploader has claimed. Original can be found here: https://www.gg.ca/en/media/photos/2013/order-canada-investiture-rene-angelil-and-celine-dion. Canadian government works are copyrighted for 50 years after publication. Will be PD January 1st 2064.

PascalHD (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Emiko2.0.jpg[edit]

source: https://www.instagram.com/p/C1o-T_FPddI/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I confirm this picture taken by my own, and the Instagram Link is my own account for sharing the photo taken by me,
Could you please help to cancel the delete request and tell me the advice how to correct the irregularity if possible?
Thanks. Brian8lo (talk) 01:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The caption beneath the image mentioned by @ZimskoSonce has a proper credit and copyright information, explicitly indicating that the copyright is owned by @Brian8lo. Furthermore, @Brian8lo has uploaded the original image containing EXIF metadata. Therefore, I respectfully oppose this deletion. Alvin122006 (talk) 08:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(○) Alvin122006 (talk) 02:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep Alvin122006 (talk) 02:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Thumbnail 9. gerb pravyashchih v litve knyazey dosprongovichey.jpg[edit]

Seems to be unfree, copied from the website linked, but has the same blazon of File:Giedroyc Arms in Russia 1880.jpg. ZandDev (talk) 20:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Qazi Faez Isa.jpg[edit]

Copyright © 2023 Supreme Court of Pakistan. All Rights Reserved https://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/honorable-chief-justice/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete - clearly copyrighted source. There is no indication of release into the public domain, as claimed by the upload, for free use on Commons. Wiki.0hlic (talk) 19:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep The individual who uploaded the content might have a connection with SCP. It's not appropriate to assert without evidence that the uploader lacked the authority to share the picture publicly. Deletion should be withheld until someone steps forward, asserting rightful ownership and providing evidence of such ownership. SheriffIsInTown (talk) 22:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete per nomination. @SheriffIsInTown: the one that needs to provide the evidence that the image has a free license is the uploader. In this particular case they asserted they took it from "Google" and used a bogus license as this image was clearly not published in the US before 1929. Günther Frager (talk) 17:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ğaysä Xäkimcan, Röstäm Yäxin.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by FlorianH76 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license, the source is not given Yann (talk) 22:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Comment A reverse image search allowed me to find the source here: Picril. The media does not indicate the name of the photographer, only that the photo represents the Finnish of Tatar origin Ğaysä Xäkimcan and the Soviet Röstäm Yäxin, and that the photo was taken in Kazan in the Soviet Union in 1970. : The site indicates at the bottom of the page: “Permission for use, re-use, or additional use of the content is not required. GetArchive believes there are no usage restrictions or limitations put on content in the U.S. Get Archive LLC does not charge permission and license fees for use of any of the content on PICRYL, however, upon request, GetArchive can provide rights clearance for content for a fee.” : However, not knowing this site, I cannot comment on its reliability in terms of copyright, nor on the rights related to the photo of a Finn and a Soviet taken in the USSR in 1970 by an unknown author within the framework of the Tatar Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. I assume that Soviet law applies. : I will limit myself to this comment to indicate the source of the image, and not to take a stand for or against deletion. : Christian28TMA (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Osaka-Metro Series400-04 (2023-07-29).jpg[edit]

ライセンス選択を誤ったため / Wrong license selection Himeji-Higashi11184 (talk) 23:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, you can simply click the "edit source" label near the "Licensing" column and replace "cc-zero" with a target license, for example "cc-by-sa-4.0" and "cc-by-4.0", etc. 0x0a (talk) 08:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

変更しました、依頼取り下げも行います / Changes have been made and the request will also be canceled. --Himeji-Higashi11184 (talk) 12:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]