Commons:Deletion requests/2024/01/17

16 January 2024

18 January 2024

Deletion requests on 17 January 2024

• archive
• gallery
• purge this page's cache
• ±

January 17

File:Knoxartistenew.jpg

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Koca husrev.jpg

No creation date nor the artist information. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 02:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep this appears to be a 19th century lithograph or photograph, which would be public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 06:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Verbcatcher may be correct, but I did not find a source in a quick reverse image search. Anyone know anything about the origin of this image? -- 01:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Ellisoknoweducation.gif

Image allegedly from 1925 claimed to be "own work". This was most likely taken from some website which is no longer online, as neither Google Lens nor TinEye can find it. COM:PCP. —holly {chat} 02:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Holly. I own this photograph. It’s my great grandfather. I can find a link online or I can upload it to another site. But please do not delete it. I submit it to the public domain. It’s fine with me. 2603:8000:7E00:78C3:F44F:71A4:1D2E:40FE 03:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

OK, I'll take your word for it. Could you possibly scan it again at a larger size and save it as a JPG this time? An image this small and in GIF format is usually cause for suspicion. Thanks! 16:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Music of the Brazilian Army

Ongoing editorial dispute over whether these files should have a separate category or stay in Category:Army of Brazil (presumably forever?). Nominated for speedy deletion by Tm, who wants it gone. I don't want it gone, but as I've already behaved poorly with reversions, I'm moving this into a deletion request for a third-party opinion. I believe the category is perfectly reasonable, it helps diffuse a category with a very wide scope, has a viable subcategory (Category:Military bands of the Brazilian Army) and has precedents such as Category:Music of the United States Army and Category:Music of the United States Navy. Serraria (talk) 03:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Besides the subcategory with 44 files, the following files would be included in this category:

• File:Song of the Brazilian Army.ogg
• File:Canção do Exército (1951).ogg
• File:"Canção do Exército", performed by the United States Navy Band.wav
• File:"Canção do Exército", performed by the United States Navy Band.oga
• File:"Canção do Exército", performed by the United States Navy Band.flac
• File:Canção da Escola de Sargentos das Armas - ESA.ogg
• File:Canção da Engenharia.ogg
• File:Canção da 3 Cia E Cmb Mec.jpg

Several are overcategorized by their presence in Category:Army of Brazil, which also suffers from overcategorization in general. Serraria (talk) 12:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Photo panel of Makino Tomitaro 2023-05-25.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

The copyright on the two photos used for the panel and the flag has apparently expired in Japan. The brief texts on the flag do not seem to be copyrightable. Therefore, there would be no copyright infringement concerning this picture. -- Asanagi (talk) 14:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Bitcoin1.jpg

unlikely to be own wor. low resolution, better quality on https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/equator-uganda-nov-1-sign-on-1286834200?consentChanged=true ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Author Rich Benjamin.png

Probable copyright violation, attributed to Sharon Schuster in the description, which was added by the uploader. May be the photographer Sharon Schuster, who has a photo of this man on her homepage, which was probably taken in the same session because he is wearing the same coat and the background is similar.[1] Another upload by this uploader identifies a different photographer in the metadata, see File:Benjamin2020.jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 07:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Hentai-kanji.png

Can't be speedied because it's a different file format, but unused and unlikely to be used because of file:Hentai-kanji-svg.svg. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

• Also File:The kanji for Hentai.png (because of File:The kanji for Hentai.svg). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Flag of Algiers.svg

no source Tgbsww (talk) 08:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

 Delete Not in use I think. 170.235.203.18 16:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

But the coat of arms is in use, so  Weak keep. -- 170.235.203.18 17:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Benjamin2020.jpg

Probable copyright violation, metadata identifies the photographer as Adam Schultz. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Author Rich Benjamin.png, which identifies Sharon Schuster as the photographer. The uploader is unlikely to be both Adam Schultz and Sharon Schuster. Verbcatcher (talk) 08:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Dmitry Berezin (talk · contribs)

Questionable images from the non-reliable source: there were no photography in 18th century. The costumes also hardly match the era.

• File:P malutin-p-p.jpg
• File:P malutin-n-p.jpg

Komarof (talk) 08:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Canton-santiago-de-mendez.jpg

unlikely to be own work. low resolution. source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=2341028626124868&set=ecnf.100070760952260 ZimskoSonce (talk) 09:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:П 2.jpg

immagine molto sfocata, non si capisce nemmeno il soggetto, probabilmente presa da un monitor o da un televisore Threecharlie (talk) 10:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Capture d’écran 2019-03-26 à 16.01.07.png

unlikely to be own work. https://medium.com/la-fregate/maison-gazelle-du-mariage-franco-marocain-%C3%A0-la-r%C3%A9ussite-dun-concept-f47c02b76781 ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Ecran corne gazelle.png

unlikely to be own work. https://medium.com/la-fregate/maison-gazelle-du-mariage-franco-marocain-%C3%A0-la-r%C3%A9ussite-dun-concept-f47c02b76781 ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel

Architect is Max Dudler, how is still alive. Up today we don't have a permission from Max Dudler. Freedom of panorama does not apply to interior shots in Germany. See also previous discussions.

• File:2021-07-19 U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 08.jpg
• File:2021-07-19 U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 09.jpg
• File:2021-07-19 U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 12.jpg
• File:2021-07-19 U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 13.jpg
• File:2021-07-19 U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 14.jpg
• File:2021-07-19 U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 15.jpg
• File:2021-07-19 U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 17.jpg
• File:2021-07-19 U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 18.jpg
• File:2021-07-19 U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 20.jpg
• File:2021-07-19 U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 21.jpg
• File:Berlin U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel.webm
• File:Berlin-Mitte U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel-001.jpg
• File:Berlin-Mitte U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel.jpg
• File:Eröffnungszug U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel.jpg
• File:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 2023-02-25 01.jpg
• File:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 2023-02-25 02.jpg
• File:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel Berlin 2023-02-25 03.jpg
• File:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel-msu-1107-.jpg
• File:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel-msu-1113-.jpg

Lukas Beck (talk) 20:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep copyright extremism see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Germany#Freedom_of_panorama & Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#Allow_photos_taken_inside_of_train_stations_in_Germany. I do believe these photos are covered by freedom of panorama. Multichill (talk) 20:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

  Freedom of panorama does clearly not apply to interior shots in Germany. This is clearly stated in this section. How do you come to the conclusion that this should suddenly no longer be true? You even link to the right article. Lukas Beck (talk) 20:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

  Picture * File:Eröffnungszug U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel.jpg was shot during an offical press ceremony by the Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG), including an accreditation process. Only selected persons had access. The owner (BVG) permited photograph shots. In this case, freedom of panorama does not exist at all. Further, the train is here the main topic of the picture. So whats the problem? Trouper3000 (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

  owner and copyright holder are two different thinks! Lukas Beck (talk) 11:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

  The architect designed the station in behalf of the BVG so they should have the rights. Otherwise they could not make such an event. I think normally we trust accreditations, especially if they are from public institutions. GPSLeo (talk) 11:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per nomination. The proposal to accept photos inside train stations in Germany has not been accepted, per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2023/06#Allow_photos_taken_inside_of_train_stations_or_tunnels_in_Germany . It was finalized after this DR was started. So regrettably, these photos have to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Files in Category:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel

Copyright protection! German freedom of panorama does not apply for interior shots. The architect is Max Dudler, who is still alive.

• File:Berlin U-Bahnstation - Museumsinsel (Oktober 2023) 02.jpg
• File:Berlin U-Bahnstation - Museumsinsel (Oktober 2023) 03.jpg
• File:Berlin U-Bahnstation - Museumsinsel (Oktober 2023) 04.jpg
• File:U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel.jpg

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep. Nothing sufficiently creative to copyright. It's a simple granite stone wall and a blue ceiling. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

File:120513-U-Bahnhof-Schloßstraße-Treppenabgang.JPG

Copyright protection! German freedom of panorama does not apply for interior shots. The station was built in 1971. It's unlikely to be old enough. Lukas Beck (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Prof. Dr.-Ing. Peter Pelz.jpg

possible copyvio (c) Abdul Waheed M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Lucie Manet.jpg

Volonté de ne plus apparaître dans les résultats Google 1984Lucie (talk) 10:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Kota Wharton Signature.png

Irrelevant and unused. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2603:6011:b303:3e4b:a1c3:3619:ee32:9d73 (talk) 00:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:New DesignSpark Mechanical logo.jpg

Revisions can be uploaded to the existing file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DSM_logo.jpg This separate file is not needed. Rds10 (talk) 10:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Satyendrabosehomedale.jpg

Edited version of File:SatyenBose1925.jpg, probably using AI. No encyclopedic merit. —‍CX Zoom (A/अ/অ) (let's talk|contribs) 11:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Yakutskoe-serebro 6.jpg

Copyright photo. Pessimist (talk) 12:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Im not sure, but this might be a 1800s photo by en:Wacław Sieroszewski (1858 — 1945). Book:

(Серошевский, Вацлав Леопольдович . Якуты : опыт этнографического исследования / В. Л. Серошевский .- 2-е изд. - Москва : [б. и.], 1993. - 713 с.)

I can not reach this book to look, but may be in PD already, first published in 1896. --Drakosh (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Stefan-Kölbl.jpg

Request by the author and the person depicted V72 (talk) 12:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Egypt 2020 parliamentary election 16.png

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 13:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

I am the original uploader of the file. The file is a screenshot of the YouTube video under a Creative Commons license. The screenshot contains a poster for one of the Egyptian Parliament’s election committees in 2020.

The poster bears:

▶ the electoral committee number (185) and other information for guidance to citizens. ▶ the logo of the National Elections Authority in Egypt ▶ the flag of the Arab Republic of Egypt. ▶ the logo of the Beheira Governorate is “one of the governorates of Egypt” ▶ a picture of the President of Egypt..

The file is used exclusively in the articles of the free encyclopedia on the Egyptian parliamentary elections for the purpose of clarifying indicative data that was hanging on the wall in one of the electoral committees in Egypt in 2020 in the Beheira Governorate in Egypt.

The file does NOT have any focus on one of the elements separately from the rest of the elements on the instructional poster.

--Masry1973 | مصري1973 (talk) 15:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Milad5508 (talk · contribs)

Smallz size of professional images. i doubt that the uploader is the author

• File:ابررسانایی دمای بالا.jpg
• File:آهن ربا.jpg
• File:ابررسانای سرامیکی.jpg
• File:Superconductor of magnitude.jpg
• File:Atomic structure of ceramic superconductor.png

Avron (talk) 14:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Telebasel TV Studio 1.jpg

no panorama of freedom, no permisson visible, beside of this: this image looks like a copyvio Alabasterstein (talk) 14:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

A Tom Wunderer (Tom Luigi Wunderer is the uploader) seems to an employee at Telebasel. But I am pretty sure a studio is not a public place, there fore no FoP in Switzerland. Leaning to delete.Paradise Chronicle (talk) Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Tom Wunderer is uploader and a member of the managing board, it is not clear or evident that he is the photographer. Alabasterstein (talk) 12:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep Besides the lack of metadata, I don't see what can be copyrightable in this photograph. The lack of FOP for interiors doesn't mean that any photo of an interior should be deleted. --Ruthven (msg) 15:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

  The reason is not because of FOP, see above. This image is for sure a professionell image of an professionell photographer, and this was not mentioned by the uploader, which is a member of the managing board, and unlikely he was the photographer. Alabasterstein (talk) 12:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Regie Studio 2.jpg

copyvio of https://telebasel.ch/volumes/files/regie.jpg?v=1686661841 no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 14:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Spartan Daily Logo.jpg

Per the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SammySpartan, I am re-nominating this logo for deletion. To sum up, the logo was not made in 1934, its first appearance was in 2018, and with the image I am not sure if this is below TOO. Spinixster (talk) 14:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Andy Merino.png

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4 Yann (talk) 15:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Huang Yongyu.png

Although this image was extracted from a youtube video which was posted by China News Service and properly licensed under Creative Commons, there's no evidence to suggest that CNS is the one who created this image in the first place instead of just using it in their video announcing the death of Huang Yongyu. DS (talk) 15:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

 Keep. If I see it correctly, the image was extracted somewhere around 0:21 of the video (I can't link it here due to the spam filter so here's a screenshot), which is a piece of 3D art sculpture (notice that the foot extendes out of the rectangle frame of the rest). This theory is likely (not 100% certainty but over 70%) supported by this article which uses "黄永玉像" (the word 像 refers to a sculpture or statue, for example 自由女神像 is Statue of Liberty). I'll note that unfortunately I cannot find the original author of the sculpture though. S5A-0043^Talk 14:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Bettwanze Topcu.JPG

Ich habe dieses Bild hochgeladen und möchte nicht mehr damit in Verbindung gebracht werden. Ich wäre auch damit einverstanden, Autor, User und Dateinamen zu ändern/löschen, damit es keine Hinweise mehr auf micht gibt. Cem (talk) 15:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Das ist kein Löschgrund. Das Bild liegt auch schon mehr als 10 Jahre hier. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Dorothy Olsen on P-38 Lightning.jpg

I uploaded this several years ago believing it was PD. Per the discussion at en:WT:FAC#Early image reivew for Dorothy Olsen? I am no longer confident in the PD status, so best to take this down. RoySmith (talk) 15:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Georges Braque, 1909-10, La guitare (Mandora, La Mandore), oil on canvas, 71.1 x 55.9 cm, Tate Modern, London.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: painter died only in 1963; works protected til end of 2033

Converting to DR for easier undeletion. No URAA issues. Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Gookmoot.png

hardly own work, this is 20+ times in the web (mostly without flag) https://lens.google.com/search?ep=gsbubu&hl=de&re=df&p=AbrfA8rK23-90vilfOVqfJzIndfv9zOYE0NgKyJSI-HcOK2llN03NaARGJc2k21t-9sWE1Cz0LectAOhxN_ZTh_t4iCFZ7UR6dd9AuSY3o4ICc4RyX-1W_rW01PyNDr8ugMpyqBO_F788Z7LT8el8c8oTwFgGJrGPCDSPw-gXyDHqQ4CVlComoK8p7d2SE05tsxHd9mW7qvFFfq12g%3D%3D#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDEsIkVrY0tKREF6T1ROa1pUTXlMV1prT0dZdE5ETTRZUzFpTm1aaUxUbG1Oams1TkdFeU56QTNOaElmY3paWWMzZFpPVWxDTUc5VFRVbG5SM0JuU1V4dVVERnZhMFpYU2pCU1p3PT0iLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLFtudWxsLG51bGwsW11dXQ== https://tineye.com/search/f1ca5ef5448471c8e2a5734b1be8733eef51c514?sort=score&order=desc&page=1, the only upload of this user in over 3 years and with weird file name and descr. and user name. supposed copyvio. Mateus2019 (talk) 18:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:1933 Chinese Soviet Republic banknote.jpg

Small size. Watermarked as to be unusable. Replacemnt exists in File:3 Chuàn - Chinese Soviet Republic.jpg Zenwort (talk) 18:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Abbas golro.jpg

unlikely to be own work. check google lens search results. https://en.mehrnews.com/news/200681/Iran-Saudi-economic-diplomacy-should-be-strengthened-MP,... ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Abdelmalek Sayad à propos de l'immigration.webm

copyvio. source: https://www.ina.fr/ina-eclaire-actu/video/i17327280/abdelmalek-sayad-a-propos-de-l-immigration Commissariat général à l'égalité des terriroires, France 3, Fonds d'Action Sociale, Information Culture et Immigration ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Please, How do I have to mention or quote this material to keep it at the Wikimedia commons? Could you help me, please? 2804:1B3:6F01:AA7:B4F2:6DDE:F71E:4232 20:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Look. This is the site where the video can be freely accessed:

https://www.ina.fr/ina-eclaire-actu/video/i17327280/abdelmalek-sayad-a-propos-de-l-immigration 2804:1B3:6F01:AA7:B4F2:6DDE:F71E:4232 20:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

"Can be freely accessed" does not mean that there is no copyright. --Rosenzweig τ 08:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of the Archduchy of Austria (Black Griffins).svg

Achievement without any historical ground. Misleading and not educative. 80.215.210.120 20:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of the Archduchy of Austria (Gold).svg

Achievement without any historical ground. Misleading and not educative. 80.215.210.120 20:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:FNB MOVIE POSTER.jpg

2023 movie poster ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

this poster was photographed and designed by me, the director and producer of the movie Friday Night Blind. I have rights to this image and poster 2603:6000:B800:1BB2:10E0:6251:F2D6:3F3B 21:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Then please send a permission by e-mail to the address specified in COM:VRT. --Rosenzweig τ 08:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Mikelcoffee GreeceIMG20210.jpg

Now this one seems to be quite an interesting case. Here we have a cup of a specific brand (Mikel) with its logo on it (not a simple or generic one) along with some art themed background, belonging to its respective owner, in this case the artist or designer behind it. Greece has no FOP and is considered to be pretty strict-tough in regards to copyrights protection. What applies here? 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 21:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, could you please elaborate further as to why this photo is being nominated for deletion? I'm still uncertain about the reasoning. It would also be helpful to understand the parameters for future reference. Many thanks HermiK2207 (talk) 21:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Files in Category:Nicolas Greschny

Delete, copurighted material. The painter Nicolas Greschny died in 1985.

• File:Albanéglise.jpg
• File:Chapelle du Saint Voile.jpg
• File:Chatel-Guyon - Eglise Sainte-Anne (4).JPG
• File:Ferrère 03.jpg
• File:Ferrère 04.jpg
• File:Ferrère 05.jpg
• File:Ferrère 06.jpg
• File:Ferrère 07.jpg
• File:Ferrère 08.jpg
• File:Ferrère 09.jpg
• File:Ferrère 11.jpg
• File:Ferrère 12.jpg
• File:St Martin church in Lagardiolle (12).jpg
• File:St Martin church in Lagardiolle (13).jpg

Traumrune (talk) 21:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm not agree for the deletion of files:

File:St Martin church in Lagardiolle (12).jpg – the main object is the altar, the works of Nicolas Greschny are in the background

File:St Martin church in Lagardiolle (13).jpg – the theme of this photo is the chancel as whole, the works of Nicolas Greschny are just a part of this theme

Thank you for your understanding, Tournasol7 (talk) 19:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Angelina Krutikova ; Emmanuel Macron 01.jpg

No autorization by the photographer. Image found on Linkedin. Besides, not notable people (all the pages using it were deleted on fr.wikinews and fr.wikipedia). Zetud (talk) 21:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:A Krutikova.jpg

No autorization by the photographer. Image found on Linkedin. Besides, not notable people (all the pages using it were deleted on fr.wikinews and fr.wikipedia). Zetud (talk) 21:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Kozorezenko Petr Petrovich.jpg

© 2008-2024 «Российская академия художеств» ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1976 UT.png

This file is unused and is replaced with a SVG file 2603:6010:F006:964B:1D11:4BE4:A8A8:E8E6 14:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

I don't see which file replaced it. We can still use png versions of files regardless. Abzeronow (talk) 20:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

---

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per Abzeronow. --Ellywa (talk) 22:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

File:1976 UT.png

PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2603:6010:F006:964B:6566:90F2:A8BF:6A67 22:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NM1996(3).jpg

JPG is a bad format for this type of image and it's redundant to File:New Mexico Presidential Election Results 1996.svg GraydenCat (talk) 00:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

• The two images don't look exactly the same, though. Are the boundaries and shapes in the SVG file more accurate? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

  Not the nominator but: yes. The JPEG version has simplified many of the county borders. Compare File:USA New Mexico location map.svg, for instance. Omphalographer (talk) 06:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete That would seem to clinch it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

---

Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

File:NM1996(3).jpg

The JPEG version has simplified many of the county borders and is replaced with File:New Mexico Presidential Election Results 1996.svg 2603:6010:F006:964B:6566:90F2:A8BF:6A67 22:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NM1988(3).jpg

JPG is a bad format for this type of image and it's redundant to File:New Mexico Presidential Election Results 1988.svg GraydenCat (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

---

Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

File:NM1988(3).jpg

The JPEG version has simplified many of the county borders and is replaced with File:New Mexico Presidential Election Results 1988.svg 2603:6010:F006:964B:6566:90F2:A8BF:6A67 22:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Prato dalla vetta della Retaia.jpg

Author: mafaldi source: https://www.wikiloc.com/hiking-trails/dai-bifolchi-per-casa-bastone-fino-alla-vetta-della-retaia-e-del-cantagrilli-41939825/photo-27307316 ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:LILU Rathaus1.jpg

copyright violation; contemporary, but non-permanent artwork, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Panoramafrei aufgenommen

In der Schweiz dürfen Werke, die sich bleibend auf allgemein zugänglichem Grund befinden, frei abgebildet werden. Die Abbildung darf laut Gesetzestext «angeboten, veräussert, gesendet oder sonst wie verbreitet werden» (Art. 27 Abs. 1 URG – Werke auf allgemein zugänglichem Grund). Netpilots (talk) 03:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Kriterium «bleibend» erfüllt?? Martin Sg. (talk) 21:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Ja, denn wenn der Lebensdauer des Werkes nicht über die Ausstellungsdauer hinausgeht könnte man das so sagen. "Das Kunstwerk war während seiner gesamten Lebensdauer im öffentlichen Raum." Peli (talk) 19:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Files in Category:Ursula Stalder

copyright violation; works by living artist.

• File:UrsulaStalder 2023c.jpg
• File:UrsulaStalderAtelier 1.jpg
• File:UrsulaStalderAtelier 2.jpg
• File:UrsulaStalderAtelier 3.jpg
• File:UrsulaStalderAtelier 4.jpg
• File:UrsulaStalderAtelier 6.jpg
• File:UrsulaStalderObjekt 1.jpg
• File:UrsulaStalderObjekt 2.jpg
• File:UrsulaStalderObjekt 3.jpg

Martin Sg. (talk) 23:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:IvanBarvinokOtamanOst.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photo violate painter copyright. There is no information on the dating or authorship of the original painting, so there is no confirmation whether this painting corresponds to PD-Art. Derivatives of work - photo non-free painting. Seva Seva (talk) 23:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep. This is a 17th Century portrait, by an unknown painter, and is housed at the Barvinkove Museum of Regional Ethnography. It was discovered by Ukrainian ethnographer Ivan Plys in the Poltava region in the 1950s. See reference from the Kharkive Regional Library publication: Note: I have updated the corrected information on the page. --Very trivial (talk) 01:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

  I also thought so at first. But I did not find any source that would date this particular image or something similar to the 17th century. The fact is that portraits of the 17th century in Ukraine are a great rarity. So I have doubts about the above for two reasons:

  1. there is no confirmation that the portrait is dated to the 17th century. Such portraits usually attract the attention of iconographers and this is a rather popular direction of Ukrainian historical science (see [2][3][4][5] and others). In addition, the portrait itself is not similar to the works of artists in the then Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Category:17th-century portrait paintings from Poland). This especially applies to clothes (see examples of baroque portraits in the "Sarmatism" style: Category:Sarmatian portraits);
  2. the founder and first director of the above-mentioned museum is the artist Ivan Plys (1906-1982), so this image may well be a reproduction (in the publication of the regional library you cited on pages 38-39 there is a biography of Plys, where it is said that he made many paintings of his hometown).

  In any case, these are all just hypotheses. That this image is a 17th century portrait is also a hypothesis. Have you found any dating of this image in authoritative sources? Seva Seva (talk) 14:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

  No, it is only your assertion that "this image is a 17th century portrait is a hypothesis" — an assertion is not a a fact. If your hypothesis is correct, at the very best, and with reservations, it might be said that "one academic/some academics" doubt the authenticity of this portrait as being from the 17th Century. And this would only be, after a similar scholarly paper to the ones you already referred to, was written specifically about this portrait.

  I would suggest that the statements made by the museum that houses the portrait, and the Kharkiv library is a higher standard of "proof" than what most of the images on Commons have... That these are not scholarly substantiated statements, that is true, but I don't believe that Commons requires such a high standard of proof (ie an academic paper discussing the actual image) for every image...

  Thanks for the links to the documents — they are certainly interesting, and this area of investigation is sadly neglected. Personally, I do wish that more people (especially with an academic background) would devote their knowledge and efforts to writing more articles about aspects of Ukrainian art - this subject is very poorly covered. --Very trivial (talk) 23:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

  I have no doubt that Plys found a 17th century portrait. I doubt this photo is a photo of 17th century portrait. I meant that I couldn't find a portrait that resembled this file in the library edition mentioned above. It says simply, quote: "In the 1950s, I. Plys was find in Poltava, where he was on a business trip, an old portrait of the Cossack Ivan Barvinok by an unknown artist of the 17th century. Since then, the museum has had an image of the city's founder." (page 38). I specify my doubt:

  1. Museums often exhibit not the original, but a copy (in the link you provided to the museum’s Facebook page there are:
     • copies of the works of Serhii Vasylkivskyi, the originals of which are obviously not in the local history museum of a small town;
     • a one of copy of Bohdan Khmelnytsky portrait, the original of which located in Moscow;
     • the painting "The Cossack Went to War", the original of which is kept in the National Art Museum of Ukraine, etc.
  2. Plys was an painter, so he could make a copy for a museum. Іn the aforementioned article it is written: "Plys as artist deserves special attention. In the work of Ivan Oleksiiovych, two themes prevailed. The first is the theme of the Cossack past of the Barvinkove region. The Zaporizhia antiquity beckoned, drew him like a magnet. Ivan Plys felt himself a guardian of history, created images of glorious ancestors, so that the descendants do not forget ancestors." (also page 38),
  3. I have not found a source where this image (File:IvanBarvinokOtamanOst.jpg) is signed "Portrait of the 17th century".

  Seva Seva (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

  Yes, I take your point. Perhaps it would be better to directly contact the museum for clarification, though, being a small regional one, they may not be in a position to offer an academic investigation. Are you are better placed to contact them? I don't live in Ukraine, though I could message them via FB. --Very trivial (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

  I don't have a FB account, I will try to find them in other social networks. Seva Seva (talk) 07:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Døving kapell minnestein.JPG

Friend's photo used without permission. Erik den yngre (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Døving kapell minnestein2.JPG

Used without permission, realize that photo did not belong to me. Erik den yngre (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Unikis batam.jpg

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Looney tunes careta.png

Copyright infrigment (incorrectly spelled as growing pains) https://archive.org/details/catalogofcopyrig3281213li/page/154/mode/1up?view=theater Bacromisee (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC) Replace with this (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Looney_tune_cartoon.png) or this (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1962_Looney_Tunes_intro.jpg) on wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Looney_Tunes#--Bacromisee (talk) 00:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Also the others files in Category:Crowing Pains must be deleted. Andr€a (talk) 03:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)