Commons:Deletion requests/2024/01/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
25 January 2024
27 January 2024
Deletion requests on 26 January 2024

January 26[edit]

File:Habib-ibrahim-rahimtoola.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Oesterreicher12 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: [https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url={{filepath:Habib-ibrahim-rahimtoola.jpg; being facebook doesn't automatically make it speedy delete. Research needs to be done to identify underlying copyright and whether we can host image or not  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ricky Guillart 2018.jpg[edit]

Low-quality personal image, likely related to deleted article w:en:Ricky Guillart. Noting that this user has been blocked at enwiki and other projects for abuse. Kinu (talk) 00:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Comment. This should be not be deleted yet for scope reasons as it is still in use on two projects and one Wikidata page. That said, this does seem to be a selfie uploaded by someone other than the photographer. It could potentially be deleted immediately on those grounds. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Warner Bros. 2023 (Alt).svg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 2603:7000:B8F0:960:2513:D14C:D5C3:95D9 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Unofficial logo  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete for now unless we had editable SVG version of it. According to https://brand.wbd.com/other-brands/warner-bros-brands/warner-bros/ (official guideline of WB logo), this generic WB logo is bannerless, and the bannered version (known as sash) are only deserved for four divisions (Warner Bros. Pictures, Warner Bros. Pictures Animation, WB Television, and WB Games). So, anything other than four divisions had considered "unofficial" logo. However, i inclined to  Keep if we can find a better vector version of this logo, because the supposed SVG image uploaded by BiggieSMLZ in fact cannot be editable so it is considered PNG file instead of SVG file, also considering COM:INUSE. 114.125.251.21 05:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete. It's an unofficial logo. 2603:7000:B8F0:960:3CD2:5BCC:5991:B113 01:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep per COM:INUSE. Just as it is the unofficial logo doesn't mean that it has justify to delete the file. 103.144.14.55 10:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Génie Dumont plâtre Semur 02.jpg[edit]

source: https://www.ville-semur-en-auxois.fr/musee/. all rights reserved ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour,
La qualité de la photo est effectivement très bonne, elle appartient bien au musée de Semur-en-Auxois, prise par un agent de service doué pour la photographie. L'oeuvre photographiée appartient bien au musée et l'auteur de la photographie a mis son cliché à la disposition du musée. Donc mon opinion : gardons la photo ! Elle est belle et libre de droits. GenieDumont (talk) 10:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:FIFA World Cup 2006 Opening Ceremony.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted logo A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Nintendo TOKYO (52505483537).jpg[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Lutz Fischer-Lamprecht 20220104.jpg[edit]

The deletion request is made at the request of the person depicted. --Badener (talk) 12:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And also File:Lutz Fischer-Lamprecht 2021-05-13.jpg.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Badener: Was machen wir mit dem Rest von Category:Lutz Fischer?
What are we to do with the rest of Category:Lutz Fischer?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, sorry, @Jeff G. 🇺🇦 I wrote the answer at the wrong place: «:The rest, ecpect oft the two pictures, is okay.»--Badener (talk) 07:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Infobox al-Aqsa.png[edit]

Suspected of infringing on the copyright of original creations, and the pixel and size of the images are too low to be referenced by specific entries — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strpesha sheldld (talk • contribs) 02:07, 26 January 2024‎ (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:دکتر افروز.jpg[edit]

unlikely to be own work. https://iict.ac.ir/anjomantahavol/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tomás Moreno Cebrián-Sagarriga.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Gnomingstuff as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10; in use so cannot be speedied, though target page at sister wiki now nominated for deletion, if successfyul can be deleted  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's "in use" on a userpage. Per COM:INUSE (bolding mine): "If an image is in use on another project (aside from use on talk pages or user pages), that is enough for it to be within scope." Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fusiehandtekening.jpg[edit]

Out of scope: too little information: What do we see here? What are the names of the organizations that merge? Where is the photo taken? Who are depicted? JopkeB (talk) 04:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Beaest (talk · contribs)[edit]

The uploader uploaded a huge amount of AI generated renaissance-era fan-art, most of which has already been nominated for deletion. These are the ones left over. They are out of scope as not having any educational use.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Map for brochure copy.jpg[edit]

The file was uploaded several months after initially being published (e.g. here). It is asserted as own work, but is lacking evidence, and the uploader's username appears to be a name different than the artist's name. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 06:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The uploaders asserts that they are a festival organizer here, so perhaps we could reach out and get permission that way. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 06:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wedding Photo Rose Hulse.jpg[edit]

The image contains Rose Hulse (name of uploading account) as a subject, and it appears to be the work of a professional / wedding photographer. The copyright holder of a portrait is probably the photographer, and image looks very professional. See Commons:But it's my own work!, points 3 and 4. Babakathy (talk) 06:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Indrani Mukerjea 2.jpg[edit]

Not own work. Derived from photo from the subject's memoir. See https://www.theweek.in/theweek/leisure/2023/08/04/indrani-mukerjea-memoir-unbroken-tells-her-truth-unfiltered.html Jay (talk) 06:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Маєток О. Гусакова в с. Прибузьке Вінницького району Вінницької області.jpg[edit]

Інформація не відповідає дійсності! Mykhailopark (talk) 07:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you refer to the caption on uk:Прибузьке (Вінницький район) it's no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Resha Konkar.jpg[edit]

Not own work. Screen grab from this interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icz291GeTFw Jay (talk) 07:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Foto elemic.jpg[edit]

https://www.illibraio.it/autori/michela-martignoni/ https://www.illibraio.it/autori/elena-martignoni/ Maybe75 (talk) 07:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

buongiorno,
gradirei sapere perché avete richiesto la cancellazione dell'immagine. E' un'immagine amatoriale, priva di copyright, scattata dalla sottoscritta.
quali requisiti deve avere la foto per essere accettata?
grazie molte per la risposta.
mariacristina Riva Mariacristina Riva (talk) 07:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rosaria Renna.jpg[edit]

copyrighted work, no such license in the source (as stated) Mateus2019 (talk) 07:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Remove it. I added a nother file, done with my phone where I have full copyrights Mgdeline (talk) 08:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Japan Festival (112780229).jpeg[edit]

500px license laundering ©Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert 2012. All rights reserved. https://jeremysuttonhibbert.photoshelter.com/image/I0000_SSpOi6F_.4, ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Japan Tatoo (112779803).jpeg[edit]

500px image laundering (Image credit: Rooksana Hossenally) https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20150512-the-master-of-japans-ancient-tattoo-tradition ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MicroPorn's Profile Picture.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by nonnotable creator, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Zakuza (112779833).jpeg[edit]

500px license laundering ©Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert 2012. All rights reserved. https://jeremysuttonhibbert.photoshelter.com/image/I0000pUrtKrcmUko ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:OmegaBS-I2D35.png[edit]

Claimed to be "unknown author" - but has a clear credit to "Howard Levy" in the original caption in Jane's All the World's Aircraft. No evidience that this is a US government work as claimed by the licence. Nigel Ish (talk) 08:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

this is probably the Howard Levy in question.Nigel Ish (talk) 12:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Talesbymales (talk · contribs)[edit]

Seem to be promotional files for a slide template collection; out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cathyapourceaupoly.jpg[edit]

L'auteur de la photo et la personne représentée sur la photo sont la même personne, ce qui est impossible puisque ce n'est pas un selfie. Donc le dépôt de cette image est probablement une violation de copyright Olivier Tanguy (talk) 09:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:DECAVELE presenteert zijn begijhofboek.pdf[edit]

de volgorde van de foto's is onjuist Verloren16 (talk) 09:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

La Porteresse, Jean Fréour (1983)[edit]

France does not allow commercial Freedom of Panorama. The depicted statue dates to 1983 and authored by sculptor w:en:Jean Fréour who died in 2010. These commercially-licensed images, therefore, are infringements to his posthumous copyright and should be deleted.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Uzbekistan hsr.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted as seen on watermark? or “own work.” vemap provides “free svg maps” alas Terms of service are not clear about reuse. Either OTRS ticket or fixing of license, or delete as COPYVIO -- I levae this to experts. Qualitätssicherung (talk) 10:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bhanupriya.actress.jpg[edit]

image not free - copied from the web as reverse image search shows Alexf (talk) 11:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:283 img 1 H.png[edit]

Violação de direitos autorais Danielly Figueredo (Projeto Mais+) (talk) 12:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:HK SKD TKO Tseung Kwan O 日出康城 the Lohas Park mall butterfly samples exhibition August 2023 Px3 01.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 13:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:HK TWD 荃灣 Tsuen Wan 荃昌中心商場 Tsuen Cheong Center Mall August 2023 Px3 12.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Karolina safarzyńska 7 śląski festiwal nauki.jpg[edit]

This is image of me. The picture was taken and uploaded without my permission violating the EU policies. 2A02:A319:823E:880:110D:E834:BAB1:5B9E 13:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We pay a shit of attention to EU policies. (What does this mean by the way: Rules? Laws? Dictatorship?) If you don't want to be photographed stay home and close the curtains. KEEP. 186.173.161.35 20:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Being a university lecturer you are a public person. If this photo showed your appearance in somehow unfavourable way, it would be a point to start a discussion. In my opinion this photo is neutral - you are a scholar doing the scholar's stuff. Panek (talk) 13:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lion main.png[edit]

Unused art of non-notable artist is generally considered out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vallattam gamesmen - Thenpennai reverbed.jpg[edit]

It is not own work as it look like scanned image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:வரம்பன் மூலச்சொல்.png[edit]

Texts can type as it in the image, and the explantion does not have reference. ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Varampu - Border.jpg[edit]

Texts can type as it in the image, and the explantion does not have reference. ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:வல்லாட்டமும் சதுரங்கமும்.png[edit]

Texts can type as it in the image, and the explantion does not have reference. No need to create images for such texts ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Amerongen (190).JPG[edit]

Out of scope, unsharp photograph, not reusable, unclear what this photo depicts. JopkeB (talk) 13:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:கிமு400 விழுப்புரம் ம2500 ஆண்டுகள் பழமையான கருப்புசிகப்பு வண்ண வல்லாட்ட காய்கள்.jpg[edit]

It is not own work as it look like scanned image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 14:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:கி.பி 10ம் நூற்றாண்டைய விளையாட்டு கட்டங்கள், இடம் மாமல்லபுரம்.jpg[edit]

It is not own work as it look like scanned image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 14:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

plate in Shin-Okubo Sta[edit]

East Japan Railway Company (JR East) owns the copyright to the text in the photos.(Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Noticeboards_and_signs)--IXTA9839 (talk) 14:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Camporganderiodejaneiro.jpg[edit]

A imagem não é do bairro de Campo Grande, no Rio de Janeiro, mas sim do bairro Jardim Paulistano, em São Paulo. Uma busca reversa no Google revela rapidamente esse fato. Além disso, há a possibilidade de a imagem estar protegida por direitos autorais, já que o autor não é a Prefeitura do Rio, como é alegado na página. Sneto12 (talk) 14:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rikard Lif.jpg[edit]

Delete this page Rikardlif (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"I don't like it" is no reason for deletion. OTRS passed. --Achim55 (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:DSC 0058 (1).pdf[edit]

foto 6 is niet scherp Verloren16 (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Grand stade Bordeaux[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.

A1Cafel (talk) 14:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Brasão do CFN - Operações no Serrado.png[edit]

Obsoleto Richardnsfg (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Hadziewicz, Rafal -Portret Barbary Brodowiczowej-MNK II-a-67-Muzeum Narodowe w Krakowie.jpg[edit]

plik jest dublem pliku: File:Hadziewicz, Rafał (1803-1886) - Portrait of Barbara Brodowicz - MNK II-a-67 - National Museum Kraków.jpg AnieDA (talk) 14:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:M (Mucuripe Line - Fortaleza Subway).png[edit]

Imagem completamente desatualizada. Cor, nome e ícone da linha Nordeste (Antiga Linha Mucuripe) foi modificado. Desta forma a imagem só causa confusão aos usuários. Ruan moreira (talk) 14:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:L ( East Line - Fortaleza Subway).png[edit]

Arquivo duplicado. Uma versão melhorada do arquivo foi adicionada. Ruan moreira (talk) 14:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Estações Linha Sul.png[edit]

Exclusão solicitada pelo autor. Arquivo duplicado. Ruan moreira (talk) 12:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It appears to be somewhat redundant to File:Linha Sul Metrô de Fortaleza.png. I'd suggest redirecting as a better option. [24Cr][talk] 20:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: different file, in scope. --Krd 18:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Estações Linha Sul.png[edit]

Nome de algumas estações está errado. As integrações com outras linhas não estão visíveis. Uma versão melhor, atualizada e sem erros já está disponível e presente nas paginas sobre a Linha Sul do Metrô de Fortaleza. Ruan moreira (talk) 14:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Estações da Linha Sul CCTM.png[edit]

Nome de algumas estações está errado. As integrações com outras linhas não estão visíveis. Uma versão melhor, atualizada e sem erros já está disponível e presente nas pagiinas sobre a Linha Sul do Metrô de Fortaleza. Ruan moreira (talk) 14:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Estações Linha Leste CCTM.png[edit]

O projeto da linha foi modificado, as estações presentes estão erradas. As integrações com outras linhas também estão incorretas. Uma versão melhor, atualizada e sem erros já está disponível e presente nas paginas sobre a Linha Leste do Metrô de Fortaleza. Ruan moreira (talk) 14:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:FlagofIran.png[edit]

Tiny duplicate of File:Flag of Iran.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lempira fighting a Conquistador By Armando Lara.jpg[edit]

painting by living artist, COM:DW. Per COM:FOP Honduras no exception of freedom of panorama. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Flag Creator (talk · contribs)[edit]

Missing original source or authorship to determine their copyright status. It cannot be ruled out that they are modern works. See DR: COM:Deletion requests/File:汉质帝.jpg.

0x0a (talk) 15:13, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

don't delete emperor mu of jin, ming of jin as File:JinAi.jpg is still there and nominated for deletion but declined as it was PD-OLD. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 15:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
other than that, delete the other files. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 15:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
or nvm, File:Huan.jpg and File:Emperor Ling of Han.jpg are kept and nominated for deletion but they were declined as it was also PD-OLD. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 15:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
also, delete an of han and ping of han as they are not pd-old. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 15:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Any proof? 0x0a (talk) 15:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I already told you the proof. If you think im wrong, then nominate User:HuangdiOfSongChina's uploads too. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 20:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Here I created another discussion. 0x0a (talk) 19:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
if you nominated, then don't delete mu of jin, ming of jin . [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 19:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Corrie de Roos-Oudegeest (1961).jpg[edit]

This is most likely a clerical error made by Anefo (error made as early as 1961?). It could perhaps be the wife of the man on the right, C. M. J. H. Hustinx. But it's not the wife of the man on the left, as suggested by Anefo Frank Geerlings (talk) 15:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It could be @Vysotsky: made a mistake here. Usually this user works pretty accurately but we are all humans so occasionally we all might make mistakes. - Robotje (talk) 16:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep I was definitely the culprit who added a short line to the Anefo description, on 6 Sept. 2018. I first added: "Tussen hen in mogelijk Corrie Oudegeest." 8 minutes later I changed that to "Tussen hen in Corrie Oudegeest, Tweede Kamerlid 1956-1963 en echtgenote van Ab de Roos." So if this turns out to be a mistake (which seems very likely), it was my mistake. I never trump things up, so I must have found this photo with (possibly wrong) caption somewhere, or must have jumped to conclusions on the basis of some text that I didn't refer to. For now: I didn't find the original photo in Delpher nor in any other digital archive, so I guess it could have been a book about Dutch feminists. I checked several, but couldn't find one with this photo. There are 7 photographs about this trip in Anefo and Commons, and the lady in question appears in at least two images. I agree with Frank Geerlings that she doesn't look like Corrie Oudegeest one year later (comp. the teeth). I will do some searching to the real identy of this lady, and in the meantime upload a real photo of Corrie Oudegeest. I will also change descriptions. But the photo can be kept in Commons, with improved title and name. Vysotsky (talk) 17:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The solution doesn't seem very difficult. But before making a mistake again, please correct me if I am wrong. I think the lady in question is the spouse of Charles Hustinx, Emma Anna Jacoba Reijnders. She can be seen here together with her husband in 1959, two years before the disputed photo. Vysotsky (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Here is a photo of Hustinx and his wife in 1967. Keeping this cropped picture is OK with me as long as the filename no longer suggests the lady is mrs. Roos. - Robotje (talk) 20:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Of course I will change the name of the file as soon as you seem to agree with me. Vysotsky (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for your explanation regarding the cause of the confusion! As suggested I also suspect it's mrs. Hustinx. My suggestion for deletion was based on my assumption that she was not notable enough to need a cropped-out photo of her own, but renaming the photo is just fine by me. This should resolve the issue. Do I need to rescind my request? I am not really familiar with Commons deletion procedure. –Frank Geerlings (talk) 07:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Update: It seems I am late and everything has been fixed already. Thanks! –Frank Geerlings (talk) 07:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Since it was cropped from a file we still have on Commons, you could consider adding "(cropped)" to the original filename. That would be File:Vertrek 10 burgemeesters naar Amerika Links wethouder A de Roos , rechts C M, Bestanddeelnr 912-5897 (cropped).jpg. - Robotje (talk) 07:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks. Completed. Thanks for taking this trouble, and apologies for the original mistake. Vysotsky (talk) 23:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:In de kerk van het begijnhof november 2016.pdf[edit]

Eén foto te weinig Verloren16 (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Samerismail-medium.jpg[edit]

Only upload by User, small resolution, no Exif, filename looks like an online download Vera (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:WellsFargo-(25) (28416197860).jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:2010 Disney Channel logo.svg[edit]

Exceeds COM:TOO. Stifle (talk) 16:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lionelle.png[edit]

Non educative purpose image, consider also deleting the pages on French Wikipedia by the user, it's just a local joke or something. 2806:10A6:19:98C8:8CD:5B13:D485:F931 16:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete Derivative work. Copryright violation. Original (without spectacles) appears all over the web (try Google Image search or TinEye) many pre-dating the Upload of this file in 2016. One example is https://www.flickr.com/photos/25304575@N02/2468086416 uploaded to Flickr in 2008 and marked copyright "All Rights reserved". Even then I am not sure this was the original. However it is pretty clear that the Uploader is NOT the Author as claimed.

I would love to claim that it is Out of Scope as well, as it clearly has no realistic educational value but it is in use. !! --Headlock0225 (talk) 12:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Greenwich observatory telescope.jpg[edit]

Precautionary deletion given that the uploader has posted dozens of copyrighted/permissionless astronomy-related images since 2022, including another of Greenwich observatory at File:Greenwich observatory dome.jpg. There's no EXIF on this image and they have no other uploads of personal photos from the UK. Belbury (talk) 16:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Recreación historica de Comayagua en el siglo XVIII.jpg[edit]

1971 artwork, no indication of claimed license Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Recreacion de Comayagua Siglo XVII.jpg[edit]

Painting by living artist; no indication of permission to free license Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:WikiProject Writing (@WP Writing) Tweet - Jacqueline Jones Royster.jpg[edit]

COM:SCREENSHOT of a quote tweet, not explicit that the original tweet was releasing its photo under a free licence. Belbury (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ape (leoncino).webp[edit]

I can't trace the exact source of this image but given that all the other user's uploads have been copyvios and this is a WEBP (meaning it's likely it was plucked from the internet), I would assume this is a copyvio. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 17:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete. There's some kind of watermark in the lower right corner. I don't recognize the logo (and the name is cut off) but it certainly doesn't support a claim of own work. Omphalographer (talk) 18:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:San Pedro Sula 3.0.jpg[edit]

Web resolution photo; Online months before upload to Commons [1], photo credit does not match uploader. (Currently in use, but we have many other higher quality photos of the Cathedral) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/bournemouth youtube[edit]

Sourced to AFC Bournemouth's YouTube channel, which has a blanket CC license for all its videos, but match footage belongs to the league and its licensed broadcasters. The club only owns its original content (i.e. interviews, behind the scenes footage etc), not match footage.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And I'd like to revisit File:Liam Delap CC video screenshot.png. It's sourced to AFC Bournemouth, but the it's the same shared Carabao Cup footage with the club's own commentators. The club owns the audio, but not the video. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Agree. The Dominic Solanke one for example is a screenshot from at least two videos showing the same highlights but for some reason the commentators audio can't be heard from both Fulham's and Bournemouth's channels making the videos identical to each other.
Also by looking at "File:Steve Cooper.jpg", that file is reviewed by Dudek1337, I don't see that info on any of those listed here excluding the Liam Delap picture which was reviewed by a different user. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:50, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do not delete. The uploaded images pass all guidelines of (licence) verifiability. The unsourced reason to delete them does not meet te verifiability guidelines. According to Wikipedia:Verifiability everything must be verifiable (en:Wikipedia:Verifiability). The copyright of the images I uploaded are verifiable according to the "Guidelines for images and other media files" (en:Wikipedia:Copyrights#Guidelines for images and other_media files). The official AFC Bournemouth YouTube channel has posted video's since 2012 and their video's have not been taken down by YouTube. We/I dont have access to their standard (license) contracts and/or addidional (license) contracts. Please provide a verifiable claim to the copyright concerns or don't delete the images. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlippyFlink (talk • contribs) 09:50, August 29, 2022‎ (UTC)

@FlippyFlink: Hi, thank you for responding. A few things:
  • WP:V is guideline for encyclopedia content on the English Wikipedia. It's entirely irrelevant to licensing questions on Commons.
  • The reason YouTube hasn't taken the video down is because the EFL generally allows clubs to post match footage on their sites and social media content. The question is whether it is licensed correctly on YouTube.
  • COM:License laundering is something that can happen intentionally or unintentionally, where a YouTube user takes copyrighted content and assigns a free license. Even if YouTube shows a Creative Commons license, if the source material is copyrighted, then the resulting work is considered copyrighted.
  • Sure, we don't have access to the EFL's media contract terms. But we follow COM:PCP, specifically, #4. Not knowing who really owns the footage isn't a reason to keep an image. If there's doubt, the onus is on the uploader to show that the content is actually free to use. Since we have a pretty good idea that match footage belongs to the EFL, it's up to you to show that AFC Bouremouth correctly licensed the video.
I hope this answers your questions. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/bournemouth youtube[edit]

Same as above - content created by the club is fine, match footage is not.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Really... I mean he is a prominent footballer in a country where football sadly isnt very well covered, and he just made history for the Pakistan national team as staten in his Wikipedia page. As staten by FlippyFlink, the uploaded image clearly pass the guidelines of license verifiability. I really struggled to find an image of him watching the whole match for nearly 2 hours and the image in question is just a mere screenshot of a fraction of the whole video lasting just a few seconds as I precisely stated in the source section. I will eagerly wait for the conclusion of the discussion but this is just straight up disheartening. Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; there must be other videos on QPR's channel that show him. —holly {chat} 19:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/bournemouth youtube[edit]

Same as the above deletions, AFC Bournemouth does not create or own match footage.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Rose Del-Ray (talk · contribs)[edit]

Personal photos, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on sandbox page of user without meaningful edits.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nuevos Horizontes Business Center.png[edit]

I doubt claim of own work, apparent screenshot from web (note navigation arrows at either side of image) Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Cimic.com.ua[edit]

Unused license template (at time of nomination, its only transclusion was Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ноздрачов Олексій Олексійович.jpg which I just deleted). There is no indication on the website cimic.com.ua of any license terms, nor is there any explanation of how the website is related to the Ukrainian military. —holly {chat} 18:13, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Oppose, it was a website of Ukrainian Ministry of Defense. It shared content under a free license. See footer:
Now this site, obviously, has another owner unrelated to MOD, but until its domain was changed, it's a perfectly acceptable source.
@Holly Cheng, can you say what was the URL source specified for File:Ноздрачов Олексій Олексійович.jpg? VoidWanderer (talk) 15:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
UPD. File:Ноздрачов Олексій Олексійович.jpg was shared under a free license. Opened an undeletion request: Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Ноздрачов Олексій Олексійович.jpg VoidWanderer (talk) 15:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As the site currently does not have any CC license declaration, I still think we shouldn't keep this template around, as it will give the wrong impression. Any content uploaded from archived versions of the site can just use {{Cc-by-4.0}} on its own. —holly {chat} 21:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I looked into archives, it seems it belonged to MOD till 2019. So might rename it to {{Cimic.com.ua (2014-2019)}}. VoidWanderer (talk) 10:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's a possibility, but it was only used for one file. Is that really worth having a template for? —holly {chat} 17:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment I undeleted File:Ноздрачов Олексій Олексійович.jpg. See the DR, and the undeletion request. Yann (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Scarlet Strange (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: handwritten school notes. Not educationally useful in their current form; not substantial enough to transcribe.

Omphalographer (talk) 18:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Heinke Lungs.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Ost316 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Appears to be scan of a cover of a brochure. Scan may be own work, but original likely has copyright. Similar work at https://web.archive.org/web/20120426001639/http://www.archive.mksac.co.uk/History/gear/images/history1.JPG

1950s brochure, could be public domain in the UK if published before 1954 and if research is done to find author. Subject to URAA. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a scan of a brochure in my possession. The printed item may date from the mid or late 1950s. The Heinke company is long gone, having merged with Siebe-Gorman in the early 1960s. Image now removed from Heinke article, where it was intended to be a supportive illustration. I did not post a scan of the entire publication and the original Heinke article was unillustrated. Delete image if it breaches Wikipedia rules. Helmardine (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please check for any dates of publication and also if there were any credits for photography. Also please check if Siebe-Gorman has any information on which photographers were used for Heinke's publications. These would be helpful in determining a restoration date. If photographer cannot be found, then we can undelete in the 2050s when U. S. copyright would expire (knowing the year of publication will narrow down to which year). Abzeronow (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Heinke Underwater Swimming Products.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Ost316 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Appears to be scan of a cover of a brochure. Scan may be own work, but original likely has copyright. Similar work at https://web.archive.org/web/20120426001649/http://www.archive.mksac.co.uk/History/gear/images/history2.JPG

1950s brochure, could be public domain in the UK if published before 1954 and if research is done to find author. Subject to URAA. Converting to DR for discussion Abzeronow (talk) 19:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a scan of a brochure in my possession. The printed item may date from the mid or late 1950s. The Heinke company is long gone, having merged with Siebe-Gorman in the early 1960s. Image now removed from Heinke article, where it was intended to be a supportive illustration. I did not post a scan of the entire publication and the original Heinke article was unillustrated. Delete image if it breaches Wikipedia rules. Helmardine (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please check for any dates of publication and also if there were any credits for photography. Also please check if Siebe-Gorman has any information on which photographers were used for Heinke's publications. These would be helpful in determining a restoration date. If photographer cannot be found, then we can undelete in the 2050s when U. S. copyright would expire (knowing the year of publication will narrow down to which year). Abzeronow (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Foto KH Djauhari Chotib.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work, uncropped image found on https://www.facebook.com/111046170547021/photos/pcb.194310602220577/194310542220583/?type=3

Old published photograph. Could be from the 1950s or older. Converting to DR for discussion, we'd need to know publication info to keep. Abzeronow (talk) 19:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Syaikhana Khalil dari Belanda2.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uncropped and with better quality found on https://maulanahabib28.blogspot.com/2013/02/foto-foto-ulama-makam-tuan-abah-guru.html

Old photograph. We'd need more information on when it was published to keep. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 19:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Janet Waldo, January 1946.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no evidence of a free license; https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/janet_waldo_p_2016.jpg

1946 American photograph. We should confirm pre-1978 publication and whether it was renewed or not. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Delete We generally side with Getty, unless someone can find this image in a newspaper or on eBay. Getty never includes the margins, and CBS would include any copyright information in the lower margin. Getty also tends to host images that were never distributed, they buy up the rights to entire archives. --RAN (talk) 20:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MT SAN DEMETRIO.jpg[edit]

Invalid public domain claim, not a UK Government work. The Imperial War Museum attributes it to 'Ralston W, Glasgow'.[2] Glasgow Museums identifies W Ralston Ltd as a family photography business based in Glasgow.[3] Verbcatcher (talk) 19:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Glasgow Museums link no longer works. Here are some other sources that confirm the existence of the Glasgow photographic business:[4][5][6] Verbcatcher (talk) 16:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Lifan Junma (Philippines)[edit]

All are modern architecture, violation of architect's copyright as the source country has no Freedom of Panorama.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:San-demetrio-ship.jpg[edit]

Risk of copyright violation, probably not the uploader's own work. Has the appearance of a newspaper photo of the men's heroic arrival in Glasgow in 1940, see w:en:MV San Demetrio. Published online before the upload to Commons.[7] Verbcatcher (talk) 19:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Charles pollard chief engineer.jpg[edit]

Risk of copyright violation, probably not the uploader's own work. Photographs of photographs taken in 1940.May be newspaper photos of the men's heroic arrival in Glasgow in 1940, see w:en:MV San Demetrio. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:HendrikusVerbruggemetzoonHenkVerbrugge.jpg[edit]

Displayed person couldn't be the author of this image, which was also not made in the United States so the given license is incorrect. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:대구역 전경.jpg[edit]

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in South Korea. The mall was opened in 2003; this site claims FRCH Design Worldwide (based in Cincinnati, Ohio) were behind the design of the building. As the Korean law does not allow commercial selling of copies of this building (against the commercial CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-zero, or PD-user licenses that Commons only permits), a commercial licensing permit from FRCH Design Worldwide is required to keep this infringing image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:DaeguStation.jpg[edit]

Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:대구역 전경.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Files in Category:Nazareth College (New York)[edit]

Flickr photos of random unnamed graduates. Educational value very unlikely.

TheImaCow (talk) 20:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Emirates Airbus A380-800 A6-EUD.jpg[edit]

Want to update an older image to this picture Malokkii (talk) 21:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep What old picture? That one might be useful too. We're documenting history so we don't delete old pictures to replace them with newer ones. Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lou-Conter-enlistment.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no evidence of a free license

Circa 1940s photograph, sitter is in their 20s. We would need information on publication to keep, converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 21:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep United States case law has sided with a photograph as being "made public" when it leaves the custody of the photographer and is transferred to the sitter, it doesn't have to appear in a newspaper or a magazine. We generally reserve "unpublished" for images where we have a provenance showing that an image has remained with the photographer. We do that for images found in commercial archives like Getty where they buy the negatives directly from the photographer or the photographer's estate. --RAN (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Marian cannon schlesinger.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (C) Boston Globe

Circa late 1920s photograph per caption at source. This is a portrait photograph, could have been done by Cambridge High and Latin. It's possible this is public domain due to age or formalities. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 21:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:David Douglas Cunningham.jpg[edit]

This is not David Douglas Cunningham (my great-grandfather's brother). For him see the Wikipedia page. Roryharrow (talk) 21:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:La république du Rif entre 1921 et 1926 - Rif republic between 1921 and 1926.png[edit]

The map does nost show an accurate map of the Rif Republic in 1926. If true the Rif Republic would have taken over the spanish cities of Ceuta and Melilla,which it never ever did. Also, it shows having taken over the cities and hinterlands of the most important cities of the Spanish Morocco such as Tetuan, Larache, or Ksar el-Kebir which it never did either. Also it shows having taken over Tangiers, which it never did either. ANAGSPC (talk) 22:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, the background map most likely comes from Google Maps (https://www.google.cz/maps/@35.7680755,-2.7933899,6.83z?entry=ttu). --Harold (talk) 17:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Peter Dabrock (2023).jpg[edit]

Mögl. Urheberrechtsverletzung. Genehmigung der Fotografin fehlt offensichtlich. Barbasca (talk) 23:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/01/26&oldid=850216994"