Commons:Deletion requests/2024/01/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

January 27[edit]

File:Daegu station.jpg[edit]

The current station occupies the same building as the Daegu outlet of the Lotte Store. Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:대구역 전경.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:InteriorBYUTestingCenter.JPG[edit]

This is my image and it is low resolution, poor quality, outdated, and is no longer useful and has been replaced with a much higher quality image on the article it used to be on. It currently is unused. Please delete this obsolete, low-quality image. Thank you! Pastelitodepapa (talk) 23:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: We do not have a better alternative for this photo. --Kadı Message 06:07, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:InteriorBYUTestingCenter.JPG[edit]

Better image here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BYU_Testing_Center_Interior_Fall_2019.jpg. This is my image and it is low resolution, poor quality, outdated, and is no longer useful and has been replaced with a much higher quality image on the article it used to be on (see link for the better image). It currently is unused. Please delete this obsolete, low-quality image. Thank you! Pastelitodepapa (talk) 01:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep - No reason to delete. Still realistically useful, and just because it's not currently being used on a Wikipedia article doesn't mean it should be deleted. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 03:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Rivière-du-Loup, Canada.png[edit]

I have concerns about the shape above the text. I'm not sure it would qualify as a "simple geometric shape", but would like to hear what the community thinks. plicit 01:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep. I think this probably falls below the threshold of originality in Canada, which trends towards the US in its threshold of originality. The shapes are a single color. A page on the history of the Rivière-du-Loup flag stated that this iteration is several rectangles and a wave. I think these would qualify as relatively simple shapes. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Keitradisi.jpg[edit]

unlikely to be own work. better quality: https://helloindonesia.id/en/pukul-manyapu-unique-tradition-from-central-maluku/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:FRUTILLA 2017.jpg[edit]

upload of a presentation on a stage with little context, and no explanation how it is educational  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Plus

 — billinghurst sDrewth 02:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Charrlotte De'Davis The BARDOU.jpg[edit]

has failed notability at enWP; and single contribution by user; not within scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Weak keep. She and her foundation have been featured as the main topic in a number of articles for major British tabloids. While these cannot be used as evidence for notability on English Wikipedia, they still convey a degree of noteworthiness. Not every project is bound by en:WP:DAILYMAIL. The file is also in project-space use across two different projects. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Congreso de Extranjería e Inmigración CEI22, Octubre 14 2022.jpg[edit]

series of images of a single woman that do not state a name, nor their educational context; all categorised "entrepreneurs"  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Plus

If they can be contenxtualised better; named better, and appropriately categorised then we probably can keep them if within scope.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Funny pic 002.jpg[edit]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harimauhobbes (talk · contribs)[edit]

Oregon Legislative Policy and Research Office is not part of the U.S. Federal Government, thus the license is invalid

A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

These files are taken directly from the Oregon Legislature's website and are produced by the state government and therefore in the common domain. Harimauhobbes (talk) 03:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Source: [1]
The Public Records Law applies to any public body in this state. A “public body” is broadly defined to include 'every state officer, agency, department, division, bureau, board and commission; every county and city governing body, school district, special district, municipal corporation, and any board, department, commission, council, or agency thereof; and any other public agency of this state.'"
"Generally, legislative records are public records subject to inspection." Harimauhobbes (talk) 03:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please see the note of the template. Individual U.S. state has its own copyright and {{PD-USGov}} cannot be applied here. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Source: [2]
ORS 171.206 does not give the state government permission to copyright documents created for the state legislative assembly. This statute also defines that all such documents are public documents. By statute, all documents created by the Legislative Policy and Research Office are for usage by the legislative assembly and are therefore public documents. Harimauhobbes (talk) 04:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. A public document does not mean public domain copyright status. The state government of Oregon is not the US Federal Government. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Harimauhobbes (talk · contribs)[edit]

Oregon Legislative Policy and Research Office is not part of the U.S. Federal Government, thus the license is invalid, also not old enough to be in PD in USA

A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • The copyrightable part comes from Open Street Map, the question becomes is outlining a senate district on an OSM creative enough to be copyrightable? --RAN (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep. I would say that an outline of a legislatively defined senate district is not sufficiently creative to attract copyright above and beyond the already free Open Street Map. The previous DR for house districts (see above) should also be re-examined under this argument. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:I.I.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work without proof of provenance; this is a crop of an original photo from the 1970s: https://www.bridgemanimages.com/en-US/giorgio-lotti/ivan-illich-en-1977-sociologue-americain-d-origine-autrichienne-b-w-photo/photograph/asset/5468219 czar 03:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ray, Emily, Dave, Doug (32017413542).jpg[edit]

it's my photo. i don;t have permission from the other people to publish it. DEMcGrady (talk) 04:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

it's my photo. i don;t have permission from the other people to publish it. DEMcGrady (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tretyakov A.T.jpg[edit]

copyright violation, the author is Aleksandr Less (1909–1972) https://electro.nekrasovka.ru/books/6163885/pages/2 Andreykor (talk) 04:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Ray, Emily, Dave, Doug (34648561905).jpg[edit]

it's my photo. i don't have permission from the other people to publish it. DEMcGrady (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kubove Šekele.jpg[edit]

low quality web photo. unlikely to be own work. in higher resolution: https://archiwum.allegro.pl/oferta/monety-czekoladowe-korony-czeskie-110szt-i10910007972.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Cergun62 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Tagged as Non-free on en.wp. See w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 January 19. Hand-drawn logos that probably are above Saudi Arabia's TOO. Uploading on commons is not a way to circumvent possible copyright issues.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cergun62 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Bogus license. Unsure if this is below TOO

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Cergun62 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Incorrect license. CC-licensed files are not CC and PD-textlogo files are above TOO.

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mini Aplaplac.webp[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Logo  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kunde.jpg[edit]

Copyright © 2017 EmBetGbR. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. http://www.embet.com/Werkstatt/Werkstatt.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:KundenKontakt.jpg[edit]

Copyright © 2017 EmBetGbR. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. http://www.embet.com/Werkstatt/Werkstatt.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kunsttreppe Museum Waldheim.jpg[edit]

© in-cultura.com GmbH ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tokyo-Game-Show-2023-Day3-2023-09-23 185.jpg[edit]

Takes up too much of the screen to be COM:De Minimis. (Oinkers42) (talk) 05:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:La Trappe Assortiment.jpg[edit]

screenshot of La Trappe advertisement. similar image: https://www.trappist.be/en/products/beers/la-trappe/# ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lapek Koci.jpg[edit]

unlikely to be own work. publ. 7 April 2011: https://masakanpadang-resep.blogspot.com/2011/04/lapek-koci.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 06:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Large Sculptural Artwork Marble Statue Shabani Lowland Gorilla by Dominic Hurley Front Side 18.6094-1 1024x1024.webp[edit]

unlikely to be own work. https://www.londonfine.co.uk/collections/antique-vintage-sculpture/products/large-sculptural-artwork-marble-statue-shabani-lowland-gorilla-by-dominic-hurley ZimskoSonce (talk) 06:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Occasion of Hanuman Jayanti at Thakurdwara Shri Sankat Mochan Hanuman Mandir at Aurangabad in Yamuna Nagar.jpg[edit]

Fraud Image Gupta Ynr (talk) 06:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Priests performing priestly activities at thakurdwara Shri hanuman mandir Aurangabad, Yamuna Nagar.jpg[edit]

Fraud Image Gupta Ynr (talk) 06:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Mahant Sugan Das ji founder of Thakurdwara Shri sankat Mochan Hanuman Mandir at Aurangabad, Yamuna Nagar.jpg[edit]

Fraud image Gupta Ynr (talk) 06:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Shri Hanumant lalji Maharaj at Thakurdwara Shri Sankat Mochan Hanuman Mandir Aurangabad, Yamuna Nagar.jpg[edit]

Fraud image Gupta Ynr (talk) 06:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Xu Weizhou at WWD Shanghai Gala 2023.jpg[edit]

Photo is watermarked and has no metadata, unlikely to be own work. 0x0a (talk) 06:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, please revisit the page. It has been edited to show the original owner. A letter of consent will be send sortly once this page is reinstate for permission. GoldenOrangeSky (talk) 04:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Koushikpuppala (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM; self promotional logos by user blocked for spam on other wiki

Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Le-Fresnoy entre-deux photo-Peter Mauss.jpg[edit]

copyvio. Photo: Peter Mauss Esto. https://www.e-flux.com/announcements/179454/candidates-selection-2018/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:TevynesApsaugosRinktine.jpg[edit]

Clearly not own work, because it was taken from this page. – Sbaio (talk) 07:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What if I upload it again, except this time be sure to say that the work is someone else's and provide the link? Yes, I respectfully admit that the image was not mine, and you may delete it. If I upload it again, I'll be sure to say it is not mine. UnknownIndividual3662 (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'd like to reupload it, except this time I will add that it is not mine. UnknownIndividual3662 (talk) 12:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See COM:L. --Achim55 (talk) 13:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lekic medalje.jpg[edit]

unlikely to be own work. publ. 7 Oct 2014: https://www.balkan-handball.com/balkan/andrea-lekic-trebaju-nam-mladje-snage-u-reprezentaciji/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Leon km20.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (can't find source). JW Anderson Oversized Crochet Embellished Sweater: https://www.pinterest.cl/pin/332070172521392261/, https://www.brownsfashion.com/si/shopping/jw-anderson-oversized-crochet-embellished-sweater-12371629 ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:LeungKwanYiu.png[edit]

internet video screenshot: https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20190506/bkn-20190506192149982-0506_00822_001.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Chunjaesoo portrait.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Syrus257 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Protected by copyright as stated in in website. Yann (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm unable to read Korean, but this is strange. The website has both an "all rights reserved" and the "open government license" tag at the bottom of the page. Which one is valid now? PaterMcFly (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Here is translation of copyright policy (you can see original korean article in popup by click "저작권 정책", <a id="footer_cpyrht_policy"> link in bottom ) section on www.assembly.go.kr:
Copyright and other intellectual property rights for works created and written by the National Assembly belong to the National Assembly Secretariat.
In accordance with Article 24(2) of the Copyright Act (Free Use of Public Works), the materials provided on the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea's website for which the National Assembly Secretariat holds all intellectual property rights can be used freely without separate permission.
However, the materials that can be freely used are marked with the "Korea Open Government License (KOGL) Type 1", so please check whether the work is marked with the KOGL before using it freely. In the case of free use, users must specifically indicate the source of the work.
If you wish to use materials that are not labeled as KOGL, please consult with the person in charge before using them. For more information, please contact webmaster@assembly.go.kr or call 02-6788-3055. Hashflu (talk) 01:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So the question is then: Does the KOGL apply to this image? PaterMcFly (talk) 13:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Made by Stefan Klüter.jpg[edit]

Possible Copyvio — filename "Made by Stefan Klüter.jpg" does not match uploader's name (who claims "own source"). KlausHeide (talk) 09:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Possible Copyvio — filename "Made by Stefan Klüter.jpg" does not match uploader's name (who claims "own source"). KlausHeide (talk) 09:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The WWII Monument in Styopanovo, Noginsky District (1).jpg[edit]

COM:FOP Russia can't apply to monuments, do we have ideas whether there's free licenses available from its author? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:The WWII Monument in Styopanovo, Noginsky District (2).jpg[edit]

COM:FOP Russia can't apply to monuments, do we have ideas whether there's free licenses available from its author? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 KeepCOM:TO. Simple text on rectangular plates — trivial. Avsolov (talk) 05:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Avsolov Given COM:TOO Russia and some Russian-related TOO cases, I really doubt this can't be copyrightable. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The uploader here. I have to admit that the photo is of poor quality, and most probably not helpful for informational/educational purposes even in theory, as such plates are not at all unique. So I won't have complaints if it would be deleted. --Wolverène (talk) 05:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Barry Keoghan in 2020.png[edit]

The image includes part of Virgin Media's logo in the bottom right-hand corner. Khiikiat (talk) 09:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Comment Not sure the logo is a strong enough reason to delete. This is a screen shot from a Youtube video, as long as an admin conducts the youtubereview on the file and passes the CC license review I believe you can keep. Diddykong1130 (talk) 05:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree. This is a very likely "Keep". -- WikiPedant (talk) 23:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can always crop that symbol out."Keep" -- James Kevin McMahon (talk) 02:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Barry Keoghan in 2020.jpg[edit]

The image includes part of Virgin Media's logo in the bottom right-hand corner. Khiikiat (talk) 09:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Comment Not sure the logo is a strong enough reason to delete. This is a screen shot from a Youtube video, as long as an admin conducts the youtubereview on the file and passes the CC license review I believe you can keep. Diddykong1130 (talk) 05:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:J. Michael Durnil, PhD.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 09:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The-Drums.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 09:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Phùng Út Hà (talk · contribs)[edit]

Per COM:Vietnam, these Vietnamese logos / diplomas, as works of applied art, would be in the PD in Vietnam 75 years after first publication. I guess none of them are that old (the organisation using the shield-like logo was founded in 1955 apparently), and even if some are, they would be still protected in the US per the URAA. So it would only be possible to keep works that are shown to have been first published over 95 years ago, else the files should be deleted.

Rosenzweig τ 10:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PS: If File:Emblem of Committee for solidarity of Vietnamese Catholics.png is originally from before 1960, it would probably in the PD in Vietnam because of a shorter 50 year term for works of applied art before the term was extended to 75 years in 2010. The URAA would still apply though. --Rosenzweig τ 10:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete Per nomination. Hide on Rosé (talk) 03:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Littleroc.jpg[edit]

unlikely to be own work, it looks like screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Qutaish-2.jpg[edit]

Claimed {{PD-Yemen}} but does not meet the requirements, probably not more than a decade old. MKFI (talk) 10:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah actually delete it please Abo Yemen (talk) 10:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Loli Corujo.jpg[edit]

all rights reserved: Queda terminantemente prohibida la reproducción total o parcial de los contenidos ofrecidos a través de este medio, salvo autorización expresa de eldigitaldecanarias.net. Así mismo, queda prohibida toda reproducción a los efectos del artículo 32.1, párrafo segundo, Ley 23/2006 de la Propiedad intelectual ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Situ Bulakan Tangerang Pagi Hari.jpg[edit]

i want to delete this item PaleontoNicus (talk) 11:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No! Very romantic 186.174.32.165 14:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Banjir Jembatan Alamanda Garden City Tangerang Malam.jpg[edit]

i want to delete this item PaleontoNicus (talk) 11:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please no, colorfull 186.174.32.165 14:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Banjir Taman Burung Permata Tangerang.jpg[edit]

i want to delete this item PaleontoNicus (talk) 11:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I dont. 186.174.32.165 14:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:PaleontoNicus[edit]

i want to delete this page PaleontoNicus (talk) 11:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, delete it. 186.174.32.165 14:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fabrizio Droghini ( DJ Fabry D. ).jpg[edit]

Derivative work. The crowd image is form Unsplash. The DJ Image is fromm where? Headlock0225 (talk) 11:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bohio.jpg[edit]

This looks like a painted art work. The photo might be the uploaders, but the description doesn't state that the author of the 2D art gives permission. Default assumptionː copyvio. Blurred and poor quality so anyway hardly of any value, educational or otherwise. Acabashi (talk) 13:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Me case con un hindu.jpg[edit]

Out of scope personal vanity photo album snap, especially when the social media style description is read. Acabashi (talk) 13:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:El Espiritu Santo me has dado muchos dones.jpg[edit]

This is a painted art work. The photo might be the uploaders, but the description doesn't show that the painter of the 2D art gives permission. Default assumptionː copyvio. Acabashi (talk) 13:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Porque Central De Puerto Rico.jpg[edit]

This is a painted art work. The photo might be the uploaders, but the description doesn't show that the painter of the 2D art gives permission. Default assumptionː copyvio. Poor qualirty and of not much worth anyway. Acabashi (talk) 13:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Google pixelated logo.png[edit]

Unused low quality Google logo. No use Nutshinou Talk! 13:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Google criculo logo.jpg[edit]

Unused low quality Google logo. No use Nutshinou Talk! 13:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:La trata De blanca.jpg[edit]

A photo of a photo. No indication that the author of the underlying 2D image gives permission for publishing. The description text shows that the image accompanies a piece of social media opinion... so using Commons as a social mediia site. Acabashi (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:PU1JFC - Wiki.gif[edit]

Weird corrupted version of File:Wikipedia - Gold - PU1JFC.gif. No use/Unused Nutshinou Talk! 13:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Palacete de los Castrillón (actuales jefes de Casa Tineo) en Jerez de la Frontera.jpg[edit]

No es una imagen original del usuario , es la foto de un monitor de ordenador reproduciendo esa imagen Geom (talk) 13:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Palacete de los Castrillón (actuales jefes de Casa Tineo) en Medina Sidonia.jpg[edit]

No es una imagen original del usuario , es la foto de un monitor de ordenador reproduciendo esa imagen Geom (talk) 13:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Palacio de los García de Tineo.jpg[edit]

No es una imagen original del usuario , es la foto de un monitor de ordenador reproduciendo esa imagen Geom (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alonso Ramírez de Arellano y Enríquez de Castilla.jpg[edit]

No es una imagen original del usuario , es la foto de un monitor de ordenador reproduciendo esa imagen Geom (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gran Escudo de Casa Tineo.jpg[edit]

No es una imagen original del usuario , es la foto de un monitor de ordenador reproduciendo esa imagen Geom (talk) 13:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Isis in sahel of sahra.png[edit]

not useful and misleading file title+description with deliberately false date; delete only after the problematic file-use has been removed Prototyperspective (talk) 14:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The uploader is also problemático. See other additions 186.174.130.12 13:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Estonian Carry style.jpg[edit]

Uncropped versions of this image exist elsewhere online (https://web.archive.org/web/20080728000922/http://grdurand.com/blogger/uploaded_images/wife_carrying-749944.jpg), the Flickr source appears to be someone who (to this day) sometimes uses his Flickr account to blog about interesting news stories by posting photos or screenshots taken from them and posted as CC-attribution. Belbury (talk) 14:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mupus.png[edit]

Is it OK? 186.174.32.165 14:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mrittika Chakma.jpg[edit]

Not own work 186.174.32.165 14:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MININT.png[edit]

Work not simple enough for PD-Shape and not old enough for PD-Old or PD-Cuba (with the organization made in 1961) CubanoBoi (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Same for other works uploaded by the same user: File:Unión de Jóvenes Comunistas.jpg, File:Logo PCC.png, File:Logo de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Camagüey.png, and File:Universidad de Camagüey.png. And this map likely not being own work, also uploaded by the user File:Relieve de Nuevitas.jpg. CubanoBoi (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Msarinizip.jpg[edit]

Kaynak bilgisi verilmemiştir Emreculha (talk) 15:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tütüncü.jpg[edit]

Reasons for deletion request -Emreculha (talk) 20:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC) There is no CC sourceReply[reply]

File:Tütüncü.jpg[edit]

Kaynak bilgisi verilmemiştir Emreculha (talk) 15:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gojari folk tale.webm[edit]

Incomplete Saqib ishfaq (talk) 16:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Satdeep Gill: please remove this video -Amrit Sufi (talk) 10:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Drew Dilkens (Mayor of Windsor).jpg[edit]

Taken from a Facebook page with no proof of open license. Would need VRT permissions to keep, PascalHD (talk) 16:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Michael Prue (Mayor of Amherstburg, Ontario).png[edit]

No evidence of an open license granted to this photograph. VRT permissions needed to keep. PascalHD (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jonathan Bailey Signature.svg[edit]

Per COM:SIG UK A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Essex County Ontario Municipal Boundaries.png[edit]

Work of the County of Essex. No sign of an open license. Local governments in Canada reatin copyright by default. PascalHD (talk) 16:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CityOfWinnipeg-MayorBowman2020-300x350.jpg[edit]

Photo can be found on the City of Winnipeg website at https://web.archive.org/web/20220902074838/https://winnipeg.ca/interhom/mayor/default.asp - Likely a work of the City, which retains copyright on their works. Need VRT permissions to keep it. PascalHD (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also visible https://web.archive.org/web/20200529230942/https://winnipeg.ca/interhom/mayor/default.asp in 2020, which pre-dates the file's upload to the Commons. PascalHD (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Флаг Австралии.png[edit]

Duplicate of File:Flag of Australia (converted).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Federal military Memorial Cemetery (2013-06-22) 07.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by MasterRus21thCentury as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Sergey Shoigu official events 47.jpg
diffentrly cropped. Pls discuss. Sanandros (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vivien - Anne Boleyn, 1909 (page 35 crop).jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by M0tty as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Collin - Trente poésies russes, 1894.djvu47.png
One is a bette scan than the other. Anyway discuss it first. Sanandros (talk) 16:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vivien - Anne Boleyn, 1909 (page 5 crop).jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by M0tty as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Collin - Trente poésies russes, 1894.djvu9.png
One is a better scan than the other. Pls discuss it first. Sanandros (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Self Fisting blur.jpg[edit]

Duplicate of File:Self Fisting.jpg CommandGenius1 (talk) 16:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Duplicate? It’s a modified version of it. But I don’t oppose deletion. Zenomonoz (talk) 23:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:অরুণাচল প্রদেশে পর্বতারোহণরত নিহাল সরকার.jpg[edit]

its a selfie, uploaded as own work by the uploader, who is a different person Bodhisattwa (talk) 17:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Parrot-with-gradient.png[edit]

Same or similar problem as here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Parrot_standard.png {{Wrong license}} Z80Spectrum (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: I'm the uploader of the file. I have found out that I'm uncertain about the copyright status of the source image (images4.imagebam. com/ab/0d/90/MERD6DK_o.png ). Another editor (@4throck) has provided me with the link to the source image, and I didn't verify it. @4throck seems to be not willing to upload the source image to Wikimedia Commons.

Z80Spectrum (talk) 17:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Magalie Lépine-Blondeau.png[edit]

Not in use, not educationally useful -- Adds nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, outstandingly poor quality Webfil (talk) 17:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep. The "collection of images"? We have only one other image of this actress. While the other image is better quality, this image is more than adequate. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @IronGargoyle At least another picture, since then deleted, populated the category when the request was opened — otherwise I'd have used other words.
    While I believe in the added value of having more than one image representing a subject, I do not think quantity has to prevail over quality. In this case, the image has serious quality issues; it has high loss due to JPEG compression, high amount of noise, distracting background lights and unbalanced composition, with the face of the radio host seemingly protruding from the subject's face.
    This image does not comply with all of the conditions to fit Commons scope. Yes, it's a free image depicting the subject, but is it realistically useful for an educational purpose? Its depleted quality disqualifies it for any realistic use. It has been replaced on the projects by the non-perfect yet way less blurry one. This is a textbook example, cited on COM:EDUSE : "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality". I would add that the subject is not rare nor hard-to-find; she is a living person, nay a B-list celebrity in Canada. There are and will be photograph opportunities.
    Could you please elaborate regarding your appreciation of the quality or sufficiency of the image? Webfil (talk) 03:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I went back and looked at the other one and I changed my mind. It's honestly not much better. They are both adequate images that work best at web resolution, and that's perfectly fine. When we have this few images of a notable subject, I don't think we should have to justify wanting to keep more than one. Unless the image is in some way demeaning to the subject, violating the privacy of the subject, or of such low quality to truly be unusable, the more the better. I will add that the association with La soirée est encore jeune means that this image shows the subject at work in a way that the other image doesn't. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ZX-Spectrum--parrot-and-gradient-256x192.png[edit]

Same or similar problem as here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Parrot_standard.png Note: I'm the uploader of the file. I have found out that I'm uncertain about the copyright status of the source image (images4.imagebam. com/ab/0d/90/MERD6DK_o.png ). Another editor (@4throck) has provided me with the link to the source image, and I didn't verify it. @4throck seems to be not willing to upload the source image to Wikimedia Commons. {{Wrong license}} Z80Spectrum (talk) 17:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fazenda santa edwiges.jpg[edit]

probably copyright violation, low quality Xocolatl (talk) 17:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fazenda itadidiba.jpg[edit]

low quality, no proper source, probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:BNS Atandra (P263).png[edit]

Copy right infiltartion Dane-3051 (talk) 18:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:LE REST.png[edit]

Possible copyvio: Logo of an association CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Chikara (professional wrestling) logo.svg[edit]

This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep The entire logo is text and a geometric shape. It is entirely within the scope of Template:PD-textlogo. Given a US court ruled the blue detailing found in File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg did not bring it above the TOO, it would be extremely overzealous to assume the minor "detailing" on the main text character in the centre of this logo would bring it above TOO. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Beyond Wrestling - Uncharted Territory wordmark.png[edit]

This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep This logo consists only of text and geometric shapes and falls under the scope of Template:PD-textlogo. I would ask those considering this deletion to compare and contrast the "paint detailings" of this logo with the blue detailings found on the letters "C", "b" and "e" found in File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg (please view at full size), which a US court ruled NOT to be above American TOO. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Beyond Wrestling, 2016 logo.jpg[edit]

This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep This logo consists only of text and geometric shapes and falls under the scope of Template:PD-textlogo. In my view, there is not sufficient complexity in any element that would cause it to breach the threshold of originality in the USA. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Beirut port, Lebanon.jpg[edit]

copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Miss trans perla del norte ,antofagasta,chile.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: Logo from a show, From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bangladesh Navy patrol frigate BNS Somudra Avijan (F 29) approaches the Independence-variant littoral combat ship USS Tulsa (LCS 16) for a replenishment-at-sea exercise during Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) 2021.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Bangladesh Navy frigate BNS Abu Bakr (F-15) in LIMA-2015, Malaysia.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Wrestling Society X logo.png[edit]

This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep This logo is entirely text based, featuring the white text "Wrestling Society" over a stylised red "X". The "detailing" found in the red X is minimal and certainly not more complex than the blue detailing found in File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg, which a US court ruled NOT to be above TOO. I do not believe there is a strong case to be made that this file exceeds the parameters of Template:PD-textlogo. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:U.S. Navy and Bangladesh Navy Sailors assigned to Riverine Squadron 2 (RIVRON TWO) and the Bangladesh Navy Special Warfare Diving and Salvage Command (SWDS) practice patrolling in formation on the Padma River.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:U.S. Navy and Bangladesh Navy Sailors assigned to Riverine Squadron 2 (RIVRON TWO) and the Bangladesh Navy Special Warfare Diving and Salvage Command (SWDS).jpg[edit]

Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:All Japan Women's Pro-Wrestling logo.png[edit]

This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO Japan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep This entire logo is categorically geometric or text with the only exception being the inclusion of a very abstract and flat 2D representation of a crown at the centre. I think unless we know for a fact that the crown design would take this over the TOO in Japan, it would be over zealous to delete this logo. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:World Woman Pro-Wrestling Diana logo.png[edit]

This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO Japan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't get the impression, all at, from COM:TOO Japan that this logo would be above TOO in Japan. If the text of File:Asahi logo.svg is fine, and geometric shapes such as File:Olympic flag.svg is fine, then this logo consisting only of text and a simple geometric shape should not be over the TOO. It would be overzealous to delete a file this simple. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bangladesh (Sept. 21, 2012) U.S. Navy and Bangladesh Navy Sailors assigned to Riverine Squadron 2 (RIVRON TWO) and the Bangladesh Navy Special Warfare Diving and Salvage Command (SWDS) practice patrolling in formation on the Padma River.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Template:Heraldic attitude of lion[edit]

The redirect is not needed. Soap Boy 1 (talk) 18:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Connolly Youth Movement insignia 2023.png[edit]

This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This "insignia" consists of several elements, however, each element is either a simple geometric shape or text. The insignia consists of:

  • A five-pointed star, which is a geometric shape
  • A Sunburst in a geometric style
  • A flag/banner in a simple shape
  • A simplified version of a pike
  • The text C Y M and another 5-pointed star
  • In the negative space of the top star, a hammer and sickle in a simplified style

The only contentious parts of this insignia are the simplified shapes of the hammer and pike. The sickle is actually also geometric in shape. Can anyone demonstrate that these are above Irish TOO? The line between the hammer and pike being geometric or not seems to be pretty thin. CeltBrowne (talk) 12:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UMS Aung Zeya(F-11).jpg[edit]

Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Navy PGM-413.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AEW Collision logo 2023.png[edit]

This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep Although I can appreciate to some users this logo will appear at first to be contentious, I believe this logo falls under the bounds of Template:PD-textlogo as it consists of text and geometric shapes. The "metal grate" beneath the text is clearly arranged in a geometric pattern. A US court ruled that the blue detailing found in File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg (please view at full size) did NOT bring it above American TOO; if the blue detailing found inside the text of File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg did not bring it above America TOO, what grounds do we have to believe the "texture" found inside the text "Collision" brings this logo above American TOO? CeltBrowne (talk) 18:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[edit]

This logo is probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep Given a US court has ruled that the blue detailing found in File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg (please view at full size, and consider the blue detailing found in the letter "C" in particular) was NOT above TOO, I do not believe the detailing found in these logo brings them above American TOO either. CeltBrowne (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UMS Duwan,Myanmar Navy.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Navy 449.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Navy FAC(gun) 565.jpg[edit]

copyright violation Dane-3051 (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Navy T-201.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Navy PGM-416.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jeb-bush-2015-CPAC.webp[edit]

scaled down and lossy-compressed version of File:Jeb Bush by Gage Skidmore 4.jpg. 0x0a (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Navy PGM-403.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Army Type-653 ARV.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Army Type-93 ARV.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Aliwxz (talk · contribs)[edit]

These appear to be screenshots of uncredited sources, used to illustrate concepts of traditional dress; two other uploads from this user, in the same batch, were taken from different Instagram accounts.

Belbury (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The image is a personal work and has been published on Instagram pages with my permission Aliwxz (talk) 18:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
For context the other uploads from this user I'd tagged as copyvios were:
The uploader has removed the copyvio template from both files, so consider them added to this discussion.
Why are you choosing to upload in some cases smaller versions of these images with black bars across the top and bottom? Belbury (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Army Panhard M-3.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:নগদ ইসলামিক.jpg[edit]

Can't find the exact source, but probably plucked from the internet similar to File:নগদ সাধারণ.jpg. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Myanmar Army EE-9 Cascavel.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Army BAAC-87 APC.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Army Type-92A APC.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Shawn Nelson Army.jpg[edit]

Not only are neither Medium nor Charles Joseph Berkey III reliable sources for attributing this photo, there's no blanket assumption that military photos (especially training photos) are US military productions (for examples, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jack Teixeira (JPEG version).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Travis King.webp, and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monica Elfriede Witt in uniform.jpg). Fourthords | =Λ= | 18:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • In the cases where we deleted we had evidence of an active copyright claim by a third party contractor. I do not see any evidence presented here, we have almost 100 images in various categories of official military portraits, where there is no evidence of a third party contractor involved. --RAN (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Actually, in the examples above, there're also no active copyright claims by third party contractors; they just cite broader evidence that the US military does sometimes contract out its portrait photography, and that those contractors do retain their copyrights. At the third discussion listed above, Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk · contribs) agreed with deletion, saying, "enough evidence has been presented that the DOD has lapsed in contractually obliging an outside vendor to turn over the copyright to official DOD images." (None of this is to mention the sourcing of this particular image.) Fourthords | =Λ= | 02:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep, I used the Medium photo because it was the highest quality version I could find (I would note that it is considered "generally unreliable" but is not "deprecated" on the Wikipedia Reliable sources/Perennial sources list), however, it is also found in other sources as well (which I address below). I am not as familiar with Wikimedia Commons guidelines as I am with the Wikipedia guidelines, but I was not under the assumption that content from Wikimedia must be sourced from a "reliable source." Much of the media on Commons involves "own work", which is not a reliable source on Wikipedia and would be removable under guidelines such as "original research". While I cannot find any source for the photo that is listed on the perineal reliable sources list on Wikipedia, there are several other sources that use and support the claim that this is a photo of Shawn Nelson. Including [4], [5], and another "generally unreliable", but not "deprecated" source, Find-A-Grave[6]. I would also note that the current picture used in the article (which you added in 2023) is based on a cropped high school yearbook, without establishing the listed source, "Martha Clark & Diana Garner," as reliable sources, nor is there a reliable source that identifies the Shawn Nelson listed in the photo as the Shawn Nelson associated with the 1995 San Diego tank rampage.
    On the issue of copyright, the assumption that a contractor has unlimited copyright over the images they produce under a US government contract is not a forgone conclusion. Works produced by contractors for the federal government, including DOD, have caveats. For example, as of 2016, "The Department of Defense (DoD) is guided by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Subpart 227.71 and Part 211 and Part 252 provisions that affect the ownership of copyright for works created under contract. DFARS Subpart 227.72 provides the copyright guidance for DoD (FAR 27.400). The DFARS recognizes that the contractor owns the copyright for works created under contract (DFARS 227.7103-9, DFARS 252.227-7013-4). If a special clause is inserted into a contract (DFARS 252.227-7020), the contractor must assign the copyright to the Government." [7]
    Assuming for the sake of argument that this type of photograph contracted by DOD can be copyrighted, it appears all of the following must be true for this image (which was taken sometime between 1978 and 1980, the years Nelson served) to be currently protected under copyright: there would have had to be a contractor taking these types of photos between 1978 and 1980, said contractor must have taken this photo, the contract language and regulations at the time allowed for copyrighting of the photo, and said contractor must have filed a copyright on said photo within 5 years. None of the above has been established for the photo in question. If you would like to change the copyright template to Template:PD-US-1978-89, I would not object.
    Finally, if we are going to claim that photos like this one are copyrighted based on the reasoning presented, then it would allow for a mass removal of many of the images in the Category:Official portrait photographs of the United States Army, Category:Official portrait photographs of the United States Marine Corps, Category:Official portrait photographs of the United States Navy, and Category:Official portrait photographs of the United States Air Force. Wikipedialuva (talk) 11:42, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I wasn't suggesting that there's a codified prohibition against Medium's blogs or Mr. Berkey as Commons-acceptable sources, but just that they're not generically-reliable, and that they don't even attribute the photo to the US military at all (nor do the equally-impeachable Mankine, Adrian, and J S Larrison). If we can satisfactorily establish provenance, then yeah, 78–89 licensing would be a great boon, provided we can prove that the photo was originally published within those years (and not circa 1995, when the subject made headlines). Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I feel, given the totality of the circumstances, that the photo is clearly a photo of Shawn Nelson. When one takes into account that numerous sources have claimed that it is him (even if they are not considered reliable per the Wikipedia perennial sources board), but also the plain appearance compared to other reliable sources, even to the source photo you provided, it demonstrates an overwhelming strong likelihood that the photo is indeed Shawn Nelson.
    I feel as if you are moving the goal posts a bit on the topic of copyright. Originally, you implied the photo was a "military photo (... training photo)" and that it was possibly taken by a contractor, but now you seem to call that into question by stating the sources "don't even attribute the photo to the US military at all." Assuming, for the sake of argument, that it was not taken by a service member, DOD employee, or DOD-approved contractor, then who would have taken the photo and why was it taken? It would be extremely unlikely that Shawn Nelson hired a photographer to photograph himself for the photo in question (what appears to be a military photo), and even assuming he did, depending on how he negotiated those rights to the photo, I think it would likely still be considered published between 1978 and 1989, and there is no evidence he ever applied for copyright protection for the photo (unless you claim that he commissioned a military-style photo of himself in uniform over nine years after leaving the military). By far the most likely conclusion is that it is, in fact, a military photo taken from 1978–1980. Per the previously cited deletion discussions, assuming that it was in fact a contractor who took the picture instead of a service-member or DOD employee (and that is a big assumption), it was almost certainly being distributed and/or sold, or at a minimum, being offered for distribution and/or sale. Even if the picture was never actually sold or distributed, it would appear that a mere offer would likely be enough to constitute publication. The Air Force representative you cited in File:Monica Elfriede Witt in uniform.jpg discussion even used the term "distributed": "These photographs sometimes are filed in the records of the unit but oftentimes they are just distributed to the individual members with no permanent copy kept."
    According to the US Copyright Office, "publication" occurs when "the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending", "offering to distribute copies or phonorecords to a group of persons for purposes of further distribution, public performance, or public display, constitutes publication", or "when an offer to distribute copies or phonorecords to a group of persons for further distribution, public performance, or public display is made by or with the authority of the copyright owner." [8] Wikipedialuva (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I'm not making any assumptions. We're lacking all evidence for any claims (provenance, source, licensing, and publication). As such, "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." Fourthords | =Λ= | 00:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Army BTR-3U APC.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Army Type-63 tank.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Army Type-69II tank.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UMS Minye Theinkhathu at the 73rd anniversary of Myanmar Navy Day ceremony.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


 Delete per 0x0a. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MN-Sub-2.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


 Delete per 0x0a. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MAS-2 Anti-materiel sniper rifle.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:جواد نظری بازیگر و آهنگساز ایرانی.jpg[edit]

This image has been uploaded to Commons in the past (sorry, I don't know the original name). Everybodywiki often mirrors Wikipedia content, so the origin of the image, copyright holder, and licensing is unclear. MarioGom (talk) 18:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UMS Min Ye Theinkhathu of Myanmar Navy.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Delete presumably cropped from photo published on Oct. 16, 2020.


File:KS-1M SAM.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Delete presumably cropped from a photo published in March 2017 via Blogspot.


File:25mm Self-propelled anti-aircraft guns of Myanmar Army.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Delete presumably cropped from a photo published in March 2014 via Blogspot.


File:Myanmar Missile Production Facility.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:SLC-02 Weapon Targeting Radar of Myanmar Army.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo originally taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 18:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:An artistic drawing of the Yan Nyein Aung-class submarine chaser.png[edit]

copyright violation. Lack of proper permissions Dane-3051 (talk) 18:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Files in Category:New Parliament House, New Delhi in 2023[edit]

The said source [9] did not release under compatible license, nor did the photographer [10]

-- DaxServer (talk) 19:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Emperors of the Han dynasty[edit]

The paintings are erroneously claimed as PD-old. Based on the photos of the original paintings published on [13], they're signed and dated: "painted by Zhang Xinhua, A.D. 198x" ("华□张新华绘 公元一九八□年") . Moreover, the artist, Zhang Xinhua was borned in 1943 according to an articleChinese on Baidu Encyclepedia. His works are most likely under copyright. Note: '□' is a placeholder for an illegible character. --0x0a (talk) 19:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Panhard AML 90 of Myanmar Army.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tata Xenon pickup Myanmar Army.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:FAW Jiefang CA-1122J of Myanmar Army.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Grand Tiger Myanmar.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Inlay Jeep-1.jpg[edit]

copyright by Ahsan. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mobile Hospital Units of Myanmar Army.jpg[edit]

copyright valuation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Naung Yoe LUV.jpg[edit]

copy rate via Sean. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PTL-02 Myanmar.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mil-truk 1.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mobile Hospital Unit Myanmar Army-1.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sinotruk Myanmar.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mil-truk 2.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Art safari Bucharest 2023 Paul Baraka.jpg[edit]

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 19:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:FAW Jiefang CA-141 Myanmar.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mil-truk 3.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:StArt Up, photography exhibition by Hong Kong Youth Arts Foundation.jpg[edit]

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Xocolatl hello. I will ask HKYAF to sign the permission form to hopefully allow this to be used. It is their photo. BJCHK (talk) 03:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dongfeng EQ-2102 Myanmar Army.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  •  Keep. The uploader has a username with the word "Facebook" in it, which is odd, but it seems unlikely the image is taken from Facebook. The image has full EXIF data which matches the other uploads by the user. Facebook strips EXIF data when downloading from the site. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myanmar Army T-72S tank.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:MA-KS-1M.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:محمد موكشا.jpg[edit]

لانها غير موثوق بها وقام احد الاشخاص نشر الصورة بدون اذن Mostafaibrahim25yy (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

محتوى احتيالي ونصاب ارجو الحذف بأسرع وقت Mostafaibrahim25yy (talk) 23:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:MN-YNA-class-P-1.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:MN-YNA-class-P-2.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:MN-YNA-class-P-3.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Thunder armoured vehicle of Myanmar Army.jpg[edit]

copyright via Loan. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Myanmar Army Type-59M tank.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. Photo taken from Facebook Dane-3051 (talk) 19:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Struck, pending the outcome of Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:This is the photo of Arthur Samuel.jpg[edit]

Photograph of an American engineer who died in 1990. No context given for when or where this photo of him was taken, or who took it. It had already appeared online (https://www.i-programmer.info/history/people/669-a-l-samuel-ai-and-games-pioneer.html) at the time of upload. Belbury (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Asosiacion linda pv.jpg[edit]

Unused file, only user edit, unclear image (are there stars?), bad image name and description. 2806:10A6:19:98C8:F4BB:4DC:A636:E0C3 20:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:WEAU 13 2023.svg[edit]

This is essentially the same logo as File:WEAU 13 logo.png on the English Wikipedia, except omitting the NBC peacock. The other/earlier version is asserted to be non-free; are there any other factors here that would send this overall logo above TOO? (It is not CC0-licensed in any event.) WCQuidditch 20:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:P7-3-1.jpg[edit]

This definitely seems like a personal file that'd fall under F10 -- no global contributions, no usage -- but I can't read the language and it's not text so I'm not sure. Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:أشياء غير موجودة في ويكيبيديا.PNG[edit]

per COM:PS Riad Salih (talk) 21:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mercado De Santa Rosa De Lima, La Union, El Salvador.jpg[edit]

No Me Sirve OrlandoR503 (talk) 16:03, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mercado De Santa Rosa De Lima, La Union, El Salvador.jpg[edit]

no lo necesito OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mercado De Santa Rosa De Lima, La Union, El Salvador.jpg[edit]

Es Basura X3 OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Speedy Kept: kept repeatedly before; no valid reason for deletion; in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mercado De Santa Rosa De Lima, La Union, El Salvador.jpg[edit]

CACACACAC OrlandoR503 (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Speedy Kept: disruptive repeat deletion requests without reason; user blocked for 1 week. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mercado De Santa Rosa De Lima, La Union, El Salvador.jpg[edit]

No parece trabajo propio de quien lo subio. Como dije, unico foto archivo del usuario y solo 141 KB. 186.172.21.85 21:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Great Orion Nebula - Using NIkon D5300.jpg[edit]

Small size, not sharp as there are some trails, unused. IMHO too low quality to be realistically usefull, especially since the region it depicts has many much better images available. C messier (talk) 22:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Liberland.svg[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". Indonesia 2006 (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep. Other micronations have their flags. See the vast majority of micronations here and here. Also here. Nominator seems to be a sock-puppet of banned user ThomasFan707 and WikiLoverFan1007. Admin, please ban.Terrorist96 (talk) 16:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:07, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Liberland.svg[edit]

Derivative of a logo with whos copyright likely lies with Liberland rather than the uploader, so not really "own work". The artwork in the crest, like the bird and tree, which are basically identical to the versions on the official logo is too detailed to be public domain under threshold of originality used for keeping logos on commons. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Simply remove the non-free coat of arms in the center until copyright expires, or delete this and locally transfer this to English Wikipedia. 170.235.203.18 16:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Laue diffraction.png[edit]

Unused file superseded by SVG version Alhadis (talk) 22:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Photohandy von Nadar 13a.png[edit]

Falsches Bild Nadar13a (talk) 22:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Haile-Selassie High School Kingston Jamaica.jpg[edit]

This image is copyrighted due to the fact Jamaica's government still retains the copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by CtasACT (talk • contribs) 19:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Only letters? Keep. 186.175.61.88 15:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]