Commons:Deletion requests/2023/12/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

December 29[edit]

File:Apple Journal - App Icon - iOS17.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Logan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: iOS app logo – not own work. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 05:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Brando Windah, Februari 2021.png[edit]

This video is a reaction from another channel's video which of course has copyright 180.251.236.120 07:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nebraska Flag Seal.png[edit]

Lower quality and resolution duplicate (uploaded on a later date) of this file. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 13:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ציור של איזי ג'יברה, אמן ישראלי.jpg[edit]

it damages my recent work. i will restart a new page soon. izi 93.173.33.101 15:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by なノな15どバと (talk · contribs)[edit]

An SD request was made due to possible copyright infringement. However, this image was created by me. The CC notation is from Twitter, and this tweet is the first to be published. Therefore, it is not copyright infringement.https://x.com/nanona15dobato/status/1625461779496325120 nanona15dobatoTalk18:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Lauren Daigle[edit]

Likely copyrighted artwork, not de minimis per COM:DM.

Ooligan (talk) 19:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Files uploaded by Kevlo92400 (talk · contribs)[edit]

very unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 20:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear @Didym (d) , those are all my own and are published in open access on my family archives : https://www.flickr.com/photos/199793801@N07/with/53431067739/

  • You can use {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}} for historical images taken by family members. Another problem is that your license at Flickr is "All rights reserved". The family images need to be released under a creative commons license at Flickr too. The default license is chosen when you create your account. --RAN (talk) 17:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Kevlo007007 (talk · contribs)[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 20:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear @Didym
I own this archives family blog : http://lognone.blogspot.fr where I published all those archives pictures. Kevlo007007 (talk) 21:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:User Computer-aided tagging[edit]

Tool has been withdrawn, so no-one is uning it Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Li Şêx Meqsûd Kuştina 12 welatiyan bi mûşekên El Nusra.webm[edit]

out of scope? Trade (talk) 22:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


One doesn't need to speak Kurmanji to see that this is a broadcast news show by a TV channel, in this case Orient News TV. As such, even assuming this can be qualified as educational content, it is explicitly excluded.  --Lambiam 08:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Lambiam Are you sure? "News (text)" is excluded as it belongs to Wikinews, and some sort of files are excluded. But a news video is not excluded by the rule. It could be a COPYVIO (YouTube says it is creative commons, the channel name is the name of the TV station) or it could be OoS. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 19:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The section Excluded educational content states, "This applies both to media files and to text."  --Lambiam 20:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Peebles Hydro Rotary Conference Wendela Sandberg (sq cropped).jpg[edit]

No indications of how this photo is educative and within the scope of WikiCommons;No indications of how this photo is educative and within the scope of WikiCommons.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Disappointed in this nomination. Please withdraw it. This woman is talking at an important conference and a quick google would reveal the work that she does in Rotterdam. Surely you should delete pics if they are valueless but there must be some effort made to look. One day we will write her wikipedia article (I wrote two for other speakers at this conference). IMO we just need enough stuff on a photo to identify the subject. e.g. this is the Eiffel Tower. .... its up to someone to check how important the Eiffel Tower is .... and if they find no evidence and they think that it is absolutely valueless THEN they could nominate it for deletion. </rant> Victuallers (talk) 20:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:NatSciLogo2023.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo; argument can be easily made that there is no underlying copyright,  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Billinghurst: To me it looks like a modern (re)interpretation / recreation of an ancient greek helmet. Most probably under copyrights, unless the overall design is considered to be pretty generic in order for it to fall under copyrights. 😕🤷‍♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 23:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Which is why it is here, for that community consensus.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Newcastle Town FC.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo; is original quest still under copyright?  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:42, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Billinghurst: Is it really the original crest though? 😕 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 23:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That is why it is here. Not sufficient for speedy deletion. 23:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

File:2023 Rum Bacardi Carta Oro (1).jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Gower as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: BACARDI is a trademark of BACARDI & COMPANY LIMITED; putting through community consensus  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]