Commons:Deletion requests/2024/01/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
30 January 2024
1 February 2024
Deletion requests on 31 January 2024

January 31[edit]

File:KWTX TMD CenTX.png[edit]

Questionable quality Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Prabowo07 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Images with either unclear sources or no proof of file being free.

Spinixster (talk) 01:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Fopaledoux (talk · contribs)[edit]

personal photo. also cant be sure this is not taken from somewhere on internet.

RZuo (talk) 02:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nude 2.jpg[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


 Delete people need to understand that high res or high detail do not equal “high quality”. This is a mediocre image of an extremely common subject. Dronebogus (talk) 07:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by MarkoPolo3228 (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images for brand; no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Trademarkregister (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images for business uploaded by apparent brand rep; no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:1955-04 Thijs als Instructeur1.jpg[edit]

No indication of permission from Thijs Postma A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How do I fix this? Thijs Postma emails me these images to publish them on his wikipedia page. I run a website on his behalf selling his posters (tpaviationart.com).
Thanks Etienne010 (talk) 13:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:4BBAABFF-6فالح سليمان-BA96-4608E83E1B02.jpg[edit]

Historical photo, I don't think this was created in 2022, a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:500356 028529p258553u62fvu24k P 350x570.jpg[edit]

No indication of CC license, also a 1981 photo is not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I uploaded this picture, it is of my grandfather. 0989h (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of the Lezgi people.svg[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_Lezgi_people.png Sharval (talk) 01:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: Didym (talk) 02:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of the Lezgi people.svg[edit]

This is not Lezgi people flag. This is flag of organization "SADVAL" in 1990-1995 years. ALDKL (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep Go do something productive, instead of reopening the DRs on things that disagree with your political agenda. We've had recent DRs on this and the other versions of this recently that have been closed with keeps.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: -- Geagea (talk) 09:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree with Pere prlpz 18:52, 29 June 2015 (UTC): If name or description are wrong, this is not a reason to delete. It is just a reason to gather consensus to fix them.

What about renaming the file "Flag of SADVAL.svg"? Hosmich (talk) 10:26, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of the Lezgi people.svg[edit]

This is not flag of Lezgi people. ALDKL (talk) 15:31, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy kept: Third DR with no new reasoning provided. More likely vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of the Lezgi people.svg[edit]

This is not Lezgin flag! Vendettaaa (talk) 03:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I will rename the file to "Flag of SADVAL.svg".
Hosmich (talk) 09:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Lund picture.webp[edit]

Inconsistent source/license. The uploader gives the source as "own work", but uses a PD-USGov-Congress license. If the uploader does not fix this, the file should be deleted. Safiel (talk) 03:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Nathantx (talk · contribs)[edit]

Files with vague claims of own work.

Spinixster (talk) 03:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Portrait of Shalyapin by his son Boris 1932.jpg[edit]

Author Boris Chaliapin died in 1979, not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Crx del Sur.PNG[edit]

Historical photo, I don't think this was created in 2009, a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ford Mondeo crash.jpg[edit]

Appears to be a screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Brett Cooper.png[edit]

Redundant/bad quality - COM:Redundant Elvisisalive95 (talk) 05:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:A house in the village.png[edit]

low quality AI art (nonsense roof) of a common object easily replacable with a photograph The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Aliasgharnadafi messi1 (talk · contribs)[edit]

These were uploaded to serve as map labels, which is typically handled in the infobox rather than as separate images

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gare de noeux (quai).jpg[edit]

Supprimer cette image TER GV HDF62 (talk) 05:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:BUSCREALISTADAOBEUVRY.jpg[edit]

Supprimer image TER GV HDF62 (talk) 05:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why? Image is to old for a curtesy deletion. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Regio'2n gare de LIBERCOURT sans arrêt ligne K12.jpg[edit]

Supprimer cette image TER GV HDF62 (talk) 05:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep No reason given. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:TGV inoui réseau Lille Flandres.jpg[edit]

Supprimer cette image TER GV HDF62 (talk) 05:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep No reason given. Commons licenses are irrevokable. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per COM:NOTHOST 22ksenia (talk) 17:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Files uploaded by Prathikponnanna (talk · contribs)[edit]

Files with vague claims of own work.

Spinixster (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Productos fabiimarket25.png[edit]

low quality photo, out of scope ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fabiimarket-ec.png[edit]

low quality photo, out of scope ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Piyalepasaistanbul.jpg[edit]

Taken from the promotional sketches of the project. I couldn't find the exact source but an example can be seen in here. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Productos fabiimarket28.png[edit]

low quality photo, out of scope ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Morning to istanbul-Turkiye - panoramio.jpg[edit]

There are tons ons pictures of that place, and this one doesn't have any educational value for its poor quality. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Red Is Up - panoramio.jpg[edit]

No educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Charles III official portrait.jpg[edit]

Protected by Crown Copyright, also no free indication for "Royal Household". Ferret-o-meter (talk) 07:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete Even though it is an official image, it still has a copyright that is valid for more than 50 years. I think maybe it can be reuploaded starting in 2073. Baqotun0023 (talk) 03:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep Current licensing is sufficient. 92.40.212.153 18:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete Source provided does not prove licensing stated and is credited to authors with no clear evidence under OGL, while the Gov.uk source does not contain the same full image. CNN only credits Burnand and AP, omitting the royal/government offices, possibly indicating the primary holder. Therefore, assume under Crown Copyright per nom when in doubt, and that the nominator is the original uploader appearing to doubt the licensing they've used. DankJae 21:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Geert Brusselers Wikipedia.jpg[edit]

No permission. Uploaded by depicted person as 'own work'. Jcb (talk) 07:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Productos Tipicos y de Producción Local (Patrimonio Inmaterial).jpg[edit]

unliely to be own work. https://www.facebook.com/AlcaldiadeSanLuis/photos/p.419365101908442/419365101908442 ZimskoSonce (talk) 07:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ligue universelle du bien public.png[edit]

il appartient de droit a la Ligue universelle qui l'a établi depuis de nombreuses années 2A02:8429:D270:9501:BC99:A570:6F34:68AB 08:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lucia Small, NYFF52.png[edit]

Likely cropped from https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-52nd-new-york-film-festival-one-cut-one-life-premiere-red-carpet-arrivals-80530188.html?imageid=4740FAA7-154D-41E6-AEC7-3B46C2510BF5&p=215289&pn=1&searchId=8b4bdeb27a543bd33b7561546d9adaf4&searchtype=0 - unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are correct: the photo referenced is not my own work. It was sent to me by Lucia Small, the subject of the page, because it showed her in a professional context, as opposed to the casual snapshots I and others have of her. Lucia has, sadly, since passed away, so I'm not sure how to proceed. Is it possible for me as author of the proposed page to get permission to use a 3rd-party photo, if I can find one? Thank you for your time. Mothratwin (talk) 16:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Promega Campus.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio. metadata: Photographer: C&N Photography - Chris Paskus ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/199879727@N06[edit]

Flickrwashing, account only has these photos of the flickr account holder

Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is an extensive comment on the talk page Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:درخت 3.jpg[edit]

unused low quality image, no building FOP in Iran TheImaCow (talk) 08:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@TheImaCow low resolution of a 2022 upload. Is this uploader's own photo or not? That's one possible question. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hornsea Seawall files uploaded by User:Schminnte[edit]

Uploader request. I was still very new to Commons when I uploaded these and didn't realise that per COM:FOP UK "graphic works" are not included under UK FOP. These are graphic works and not 2D works of artistic craftsmanship so should be deleted. My apologies for the inconvenience --Schminnte (talk) 08:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Torsten toeller fressnapf.jpg[edit]

Urheberrechtsverletzung, Quelle des Bildes ist "(c) Fressnapf Holding SE / Yvonne Ploenes", keine Freigabe ersichtlich 2A01:5241:667:F900:0:0:0:7B18 08:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Porträt Hennecke 1.jpg[edit]

no permission visible in: https://www.th-koeln.de/personen/angelika.hennecke/ beside of this the naming rights of the photographer was not preserved Alabasterstein (talk) 08:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/"Paul Sieffert"[edit]

The French artist fr:Paul Sieffert died in 1957, so his works are still protected in France and also in the US if they're post-1928. The files should therefore be deleted. The paintings shown are not dated, so the files can be restored in 2053 (URAA) unless they can be dated and therefore undeleted earlier (after 95 + 1 years).

Rosenzweig τ 09:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Portrait de Louis Roger.jpg is dated 1899 on the painting, so that file can be restored in 2028. --Rosenzweig τ 09:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giuseppe Frassinetti.jpg[edit]

Not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 07:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: if this is from 1966 as claimed it is obviously not in the PD. --Rosenzweig τ 14:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Giuseppe Frassinetti.jpg[edit]

I doubt this is "own work" as claimed. An extract of this painting is available at Facebook [1] since July 2023, so this is apparently someone else's work, which would make the file a copyvio that should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 09:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Labascsiga2.jpg[edit]

Out of scope, only used on 1 user sandbox. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 09:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files with fake "Mil.gov.ua" license 8[edit]

Invalid license. Probably a non-free images COM:EVID. License (Mil.gov.ua) applies only to materials posted on the web-site Mil.gov.ua, not on their social media. Needed link where this fotos published at Mil.gov.ua (COM:PCP).
Also see: no one has provided any evidence that content from social pages can be considered free:Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/11#Media_published_by_press_services_of_Ukrainian_military
Also the same closed DRs:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files with fake "Mil.gov.ua" license,
Commons:Deletion requests/Files with fake "Mil.gov.ua" license 2,
Commons:Deletion requests/Files with fake "Mil.gov.ua" license 3, etc. --Kursant504 (talk) 10:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is not true. Facebook page of Ministry of Defence of Ukraine explicitly states Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 11:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This Facebook Commons:Deletion requests/Files with fake "Mil.gov.ua" license 5? Kursant504 (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
"...license terms say only the website is cc-by 4.0. Their Facebook says "Creative Commons license" is not specific enough, it could be cc-by-nc-nd for Facebook images..."Kursant504 (talk) 12:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I provided the link. Do not act like you do not see it. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 12:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, now I see. I had corrected DR. The Facebook photos are ok because it says it is Creative Commons Attribution (not a NC term present) on the Facebook page, BUT the Twitter (X) photos are not OK because the Twitter page doesn't say what licence they are. The Facebook photos need their license tags changed from mil.gov.ua to the generic CC-BY-4.0 for not having a mistake again. Kursant504 (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also see: Template:Mil.gov.ua Twitter - it was deleted because no one has provided any evidence that content from Twitter (X) can be considered free.Kursant504 (talk) 04:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
All images bearing the insignia of a Ukrainian military unit automatically fall into the Ukrainian public domain due to the presence of this insignia. Numerous times, Wikimedia users have requested the removal of images that are in the Ukrainian public domain, citing an invalid license, because these users are not familiar with Ukrainian law. In Ukraine, if you take a non-artistic image of military equipment, this image is in the public domain, whether it is signed by its photographer or not.
I believe that all these unfounded requests for the removal of images from the Ukrainian public domain related to the war in Ukraine are more aimed at disinforming the public than defending copyright.
I’m not going to spend my evening checking all the files proposed for deletion, but this one: File:UA 14th brigade Feb 2022 01.jpg clearly bears the insignia of its regiment, irrefutable proof that it belongs to the Ukrainian public domain, as indicated by the license on its page.
Not being a Wikipedia administrator, I can’t do much, but it’s time for an administrator to clean up all these unfounded deletion requests, even if they are slipped in the middle of founded requests
The last time I intervened on a deletion request, there was a vote for (the requester’s) a vote against (mine) and the file from the Ukrainian public domain was deleted, on the grounds that it was not in the public domain.
I hope that an administrator will place the files of the Ukrainian public domain, at least all those bearing the insignia of a Ukrainian military unit under protection to avoid this recurring vandalism under the guise of legality.
I would like to remind you that the subject of the war in Ukraine is a sensitive subject, and that the Russian side is used to turning laws and regulations against the entities from which they emanate
Wikipedia is not in good odor with the Kremlin, and trolls also wreak havoc here, they can’t do it on wikipedia pages because they are too monitored, but they can turn wikipedia rules against Wikipedia by stupidly applying the rules.
I know very well that in the United States, Facebook images are not in the public domain, but here it is about the Ukrainian public domain, and in Ukraine, all military units have a Facebook account, with a soldier in charge of supplying them with news and photos or videos. By Ukrainian law, all these media, bearing the insignia of the military unit belong to the Ukrainian public domain. Regardless of what the Russians or their followers say.”
Christian28TMA (talk) 23:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Can you show this law to us? You know that PD depends on ukranian laws Template:PD-UA-exempt Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ukraine. Kursant504 (talk) 10:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Law of Ukraine on Copyright and Related rights
article 10 paragraph d
The worst part is that all it takes is reading the information on the pages of all these media to see that they indeed come from the official accounts of the Ukrainian military units, and they all have the template {{mil.gov.ua}}.
Where is the problem? These are media, published by the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, referenced on Common as such, with the correct template: What more is needed? The handwritten signature of President Zelenski?
Or do you dispute the fact that in Ukraine, each military unit has a Facebook account? Maybe we should write a Wikipedia article to convince you?
You are Russian, does that make you an expert in Ukrainian law? Or are you defending Russia’s interests on Wikipedia by erasing everything that could inform the public about the war in Ukraine? Or should we, on Wikipedia too, only talk about “special operations” and not broadcast anything about this war?
Your quality as a Russian, and your determination, during the Russo-Ukrainian war, to want to remove media from the Ukrainian military public domain from Commons, seem suspicious to me.
Christian28TMA (talk) 22:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
All images bearing the insignia of a Ukrainian military unit automatically fall into the Ukrainian public domain due to the presence of this insignia." is very easy to rebut and is an absurd idea.
While the logo patches of Ukrainian military units are themselves public domain, photos with an Ukrainian military insignia in the photo are not inherently public domain. Ukrainian copyright law is not like the US where all government photos are public domain, and if I took a photo of the copyrighted Jonathan Downing painting while a person wearing a Ukrainian military uniform with a Ukrainian military logo patch was in the frame of the photo or standing in front of the painting, that photo would certainly not be allowed on Commons! Ukrainians that want all photos made by the Ukrainian government to be free should ask their government to change their copyright laws, or ask for releases from the individual military units. But Ukrainian military photos are not inherently free, just like Russian military photos are not inherently free, no matter how much anyone may want them to be free. If they were, the government websites would say "public domain" not various different creative commons licences. PD-UA-exempt is for official government documents like text of statutes, court transcripts, postage, stamps currency - much like PD-RU-exempt - but it absolutely does not cover still photos and videos.Kursant504 (talk) 04:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
About "article 10 paragraph d" - "...it applies only to signs and symbols, not photographic or audiovisual works..." not for works and fotos with them. ( Commons:Deletion requests/Files from "PD UA Military"). Also it is easy to see that this logos has added on photo after it was made. You really think that if I will get an ukranian military patch and put it in a foto of non-free subject at "photoshop" - it will stay free? Really?Kursant504 (talk) 04:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And if you will check - I upload a files under correct ukranian PD licenses, I had fixed licenses on some ukr-files to correct and I also delete unfree russian military fotos and fotos with fake "mil.ru"-license. It is easy to check. Therefore, your claims are groundless.Kursant504 (talk) 04:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I can turn your fallacious argument back on you: according to your reasoning, it would be enough for you to copy an image from the Ukrainian public domain that you would capture on one of the official accounts of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense to claim copyright for your benefit.
It is possible that Russian law works this way, I don’t know, but not Ukrainian law, nor American law: If an image has been published without copyright because it belongs to the public domain, it is definitively in the public domain, even if it is subsequently published by another media. And no one has the right to claim copyright.
The insignia of Ukrainian military units are definitively in the Ukrainian public domain, as are the media issued by the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense.
All the media for which you have requested deletion on this page were copied to an official account of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense (on the social network Facebook), this was clearly indicated by the Wikipedian who uploaded them to Commons.
All the media for which you have requested deletion on this page have the correct license, namely {{mil.gov.ua}}.
The fact that these media from the Ukrainian public domain created by the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense or a Ukrainian soldier were copied to Facebook does not make them subject to copyright.
There is no obligation, when reproducing a media from the Ukrainian public domain on a social network, to mention that it belongs to the public domain, on the other hand, it is forbidden to claim copyright for oneself or for a third party.
What bothers me is that all the media for which you request deletion on this page are media from the Ukrainian public domain, correctly uploaded, and for which there is no ambiguity: they are all media from the Ukrainian public domain.
I note that all your deletion requests, except for the photo of Joseph Stalin, on your last 50 contributions, concern media from the Ukrainian public domain published by an organ of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense and related to the war your country is waging against Ukraine. This is at least disturbing, and I am more than suspicious of your motivations.
I fully understand your Russian patriotism, it is quite legitimate for a Russian to be patriotic. But on Wikipedia, we must be neutral, and you are not. You do not have, on Wikipedia, to take the side of Russia, any more than that of Ukraine. And you do not have to invent a copyright on a media from the Ukrainian public domain on the pretext that it was copied to an official account of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense on Facebook.
You also do not have to claim, for yourself or for a third party, a copyright on a Ukrainian military unit insignia.
In summary, all the media for which you request deletion on this page were published by the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, as evidenced by their presence on the Facebook accounts belonging to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, they were correctly labeled by the template {{mil.gov.ua}} and there is no reason to delete them from Commons, even if it would please the Russian Army.
Christian28TMA (talk) 10:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm sorry, but now I clearly see that you don't understand anything about copyright protection and PD... Kursant504 (talk) 10:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I’m sorry, but when a media belongs to the “public domain” it is very easy, except for you apparently, to understand that there can be no copyright applicable to this media, even if it has been reproduced later by another broadcaster.
For you, when an image is in the Ukrainian public domain, from what moment can any copyright be applied to it?
Which words do you not understand in “Ukrainian public domain”?
If you are not sure about a license on a file from the Ukrainian public domain, add the {{license review}} template to the media license, and wait for a neutral Wikipedian, whose task it is to verify the licenses of the media, and who is not a national of either Ukraine or Russia, which are currently two countries at war.
All your requests for media deletion on Commons concern media related to the war your country is waging in Ukraine, and all your requests aim to delete images with informative content about this war.
Clearly, you are applying Russian law which does not recognize the legitimacy of Ukrainian law, but we are here on Wikipedia Commons, and Russian law does not apply to Ukrainian media.
I repeat to you once again: all the files for which you have requested deletion on this page are part of the Ukrainian public domain, as is clearly indicated on their license.
I will translate it for you into Russian : Все файлы, удаление которых вы запросили на этой странице, являются частью украинского общественного достояния, как это ясно указано в их лицензии.
I am increasingly doubting your personal neutrality regarding the war your country is waging in Ukraine as I look at your contributions on Wikipedia Commons.
Christian28TMA (talk) 13:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think you are wrong as per Kursant. Media posted by Ukr MOD on Facebook is not CC unless it is present on their website, just like Russian videos posted on Telegram or VK accounts of Russian MOD are not CC unles present on website. F.Alexsandr (talk) 01:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I am not an expert on Ukraine, but "photographs are automatically public domain if they contain a military logo" doesn't pass the sniff test for me, and regardless, photographs hosted on Wikimedia Commons must be freely licensed or public domain in the United States as well. If it is from a source that explicitly says it's cc-by-4.0, then that is fine. If we don't have explicitly free license, then we have to delete because we respect the copyright of Ukrainian photographers. And as a Polish-American, I feel for Ukraine, but I cannot be partial in my decisions. Abzeronow (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pupo sanremo 83.gif[edit]

San Remo screenshot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gENj7PgXIcc ZimskoSonce (talk) 10:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:বিলের বিকেল বেলার মুহূর্ত.jpg[edit]

Out of project scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 10:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pencader information board detail - geograph.org.uk - 6227348.jpg[edit]

No COM:FOP UK for graphics on an outdoor information board. Belbury (talk) 10:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete: Obvious derivative work, and none of the usual exceptions can save it. --bjh21 (talk) 11:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Weverse.spakling blue jan 2024.jpg[edit]

Dubious license EdrianJustine (talk) 10:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ТРЦ Retroville на проспекті Правди 2.jpg[edit]

Seems to be a not free image. Description says: "Війна в Києві та області в 7 знакових знімках (Колаж РБК-Україна / Getty Images / РБК-Україна / Віталій Носач)" but the article does not specify which photos were taken from the Getty Images. Without this, we have to consider that any photo in the article can be a foto from the Getty Images. Kursant504 (talk) 10:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This photo was copied, as indicated by the Wikipedian who uploaded it to the RBC-Ukraine information portal here: Війна в Києві та області в 7 знакових знімках. Як ці місця виглядають зараз which specifies at the bottom of the page:
 :

Информационный портал «РБК-Украина» имеет трехъязычную версию (украинскую, российскую и английскую), главная страница портала – https://www.rbc.ua. Фотографии, изображения принадлежат их правообладателям. Все фотографии на этом сайте, авторами которых являются сотрудники РБК-Украина, размещены на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Редакция РБК-Украина может не разделять точку зрения авторов. Оценочные суждения не подлежат опровержению и подтверждению их правдивости. За достоверность и содержание рекламы ответственность несет рекламодатель. Материалы, отмеченные плашкой «Пресс-релизы», «Спецпроект», «Новости компании», «Партнерский материал», «Promo», «Благотворительность», размещаются на правах рекламы и преимущественно предназначены для лиц от 21-летнего возраста.© ООО "УБТ", 2006-2024.


translation :

The information portal “RBC-Ukraine” has a trilingual version (Ukrainian, Russian and English), the main page of the portal is https://www.rbc.ua. Photographs and images belong to their respective owners. All photographs on this site, the authors of which are employees of RBC-Ukraine, are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. The editors of RBC-Ukraine may not share the authors’ point of view. Value judgments are not subject to refutation and confirmation of their truthfulness. The advertiser is responsible for the accuracy and content of the advertisement. Materials marked “Press Releases”, “Special Project”, “Company News”, “Partnership Material”, “Promo”, “Charity” are placed as advertising and are primarily intended for persons over 21 years of age. © LLC “UBT”, 2006-2024.</


I searched through a reverse image search to see if there was an earlier version of this media, I found none with the same framing and the same angle of view even though the event made the headlines on many media
I note on the Wikipedia Commons page of the media that the license is indeed {{Rbc.ua}}{{license review}}. As long as an approved reviewer has not validated or invalidated the media license, there is no need to interfere with the action of image reviewers and to substitute for their action.
Christian28TMA (talk) 11:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The template says: "This file was downloaded from the site rbc.ua. Note: This licence applies only own images except images gathered from news agencies or image services like Getty Images." Kursant504 (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This image is not accessible on Getty Images, nor on any other platforms.
This image was captured by an employee of the RBC-Ukraine agency under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, as is explicitly indicated on the media at the bottom of the page where it was published.
A reverse image search unambiguously demonstrates that it was indeed the RBC-Ukraine agency that first disseminated it.
This image was subsequently uploaded to Wikipedia Commons, there is no other publication of this image to date (2024/02/03), whether on Getty Images or elsewhere.
Under no circumstances can Getty Images claim the paternity of this image which belongs to the RBC-Ukraine agency and which has never been published on any site owned by Getty Images.
I kindly ask you to read the mentions inscribed on the media before contesting their veracity to delete the work of an internet user.
I remind you of your duty of neutrality when you contribute to Wikipedia. Your obstinacy in wanting to delete from Wikipedia anything that can inform internet users about the reality of the war and the war crimes that your country, Russia, is committing in Ukraine, is clearly not a neutral attitude.
To maintain a neutral attitude, I suggest you not get involved in a subject for which, manifestly, you take sides for your country. Focus on Russian copyright laws, that’s your field, and stay neutral on Wikipedia.
Christian28TMA (talk) 11:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Why should anyone even care at all about your opinions on copyright since you think that all images containing a military logo are inherently public domain? Unlike you who doesn't care about copyright at all, Getty images doesn't play around with copyright and frequently sues people for use of their photos. My nationality is not relevant here and your ad hominem attacks show that you have no real arguments besides making up rules as you go. How many times do I have to say this, the political value of a photo is irrelevant to the copyright status of the photo? Let's try that logic the other way around: What would you think if a Stalinist editor protested against my deletion nomination of the photo of Stalin taken by Fyodor Kislov that I just nominated for deletion on the grounds that they felt like it was "erasing" Stalin from history and claiming that Russian copyrights aren't real? Would you support that argument? I doubt it. Kursant504 (talk) 09:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment @Kursant504: « any photo in the article can be a foto from the Getty Images » is not really a valid argument. It's easy to check on Getty if the image is there or not. I had a look and didn't find it (plus, I saw that this image does not fit the style or other images on the same place at the same time on Getty, unlike https://www.rbc.ua/static/ckef2/img/imgonline_com_ua_resize_bfkgza6gkuacx.jpg on the same articles which is clearly from Getty).
That said, the situation is confusing. Someone should write to rbc.ua and/or the article's author Vitaliy Nosach to have more information on who is the real author of the picture.
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Uploader must show us that this is a free photo COM:EVID, not we must do that and search this foto on the Getty Images or at other rbc-articles. Kursant504 (talk) 09:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kursant504: The uploader has an obligation to provide the correct license: he did it. He has an obligation to provide the site where he found it: he did it. The site where he downloaded the photo clearly and unequivocally states that this photo was taken by one of the employees of the site's owning company, and that this photo is published under the copyright status: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Consequently, there was no reason to search on Getty Image.
However, because of your false accusations, I did a reverse image search on the internet, both on Cyrillic sites and on Latin character sites: this photo does not appear on any other site, despite the importance of the war crime committed, all other photos of this event were taken from a different angle, and from a different point of view, with a different framing.
Wikipedia is a collaborative site, there is nothing in the Wikipedia statutes that prohibits several Wikipedians from collaborating on the same page, it is even the raison d'être of Wikipedia.
But anyway, there is nothing in this photo that would justify an in-depth search like the one I did because of your false and slanderous accusations.
This photo was taken by an employee of RBC-Ukraine, it was published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license as clearly indicated on the publication page of this photo, and the license is clearly indicated on Wikipedia.
On the other hand, this upload carries the template {{license review}} which stipulates that a reviewer must verify the validity of the License, reviewers must have been approved by the community: You are not, Kursant504, a reviewer approved by the community and you do not pulling the rug out from under your feet of the reviewers by requesting the deletion of this upload before they have had time to do their checks.
If a reviewer approved by the community discovers that what is written on the RBC-Ukraine site is not reality, it is up to this reviewer to decide, either to delete this media, or to affix the correct license, or to leave it as is.
If you are looking for an image reviewer, I suggest you address a competent person, who will be able, in less than a minute to go to the RBC-Ukraine site, read the mention at the bottom of the page, and do a reverse image search to see that this image does indeed belong to RBC-Ukraine, and that it was indeed published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Christian28TMA (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Arrested Medvedchuk.jpg[edit]

Probably a not free image. It is doubtful that the photo with the SBU copyright was taken by rbk.ua employees. You need to give a link to the page (not a link to the photo itself) where this photo was published and indicated that the author is an employee of rbk.ua COM:EVID. Kursant504 (talk) 10:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This photo of Viktor Medvedtchouk was first broadcast by the SBU on April 12, 2022, it is credited by the Ukrainian security service as clearly stipulated by the news media that broadcast it on the internet on this page: Courrier international - Le kremlin ne compte pas échanger Viktor Medvedtchouk
That being said, I cannot comment on the legality of broadcasting this photo, not because of copyright (Ukrainian public domain) but because it represents a living person in handcuffs, which is prohibited in many countries. Personally, I would be more comfortable if this photo was cropped so as not to show the handcuffed hands.
Christian28TMA (talk) 10:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Headshot - David M. Night Maire.jpg[edit]

Claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Author Daniel J Lightfoot (407) 375-1416 Copyright holder Daniel J Lightfoot Photography". VRT permission from Daniel Lightfoot needed. MKFI (talk) 10:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Museums Mitte, Ausstellungseröffnung 03.jpg[edit]

Das Foto ist nichtssagend. Zudem bildet es Menschen möglicherweise gegen deren Willen. Ich als Hochlader würde mich freuen, wenn das Foto gelöscht werden würde. Berlinschneid (talk) 10:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Iraq War protest 0031 (51067177392).jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 10:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Jakubko3112 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Taken from FB/the web with a fake US PD license

Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gbawden, these photos i took from others people from their personal photo album...please dont delete photos from wiki...Thank you 84.47.34.99 17:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:London Mar 15 2008 Stop the War protest AB 6.JPG[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 10:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As with Commons:Deletion requests/File:UK Anti Bush visit protest.jpg, I don't believe this objection applies in this case. Protest placards are intended to be photographed and the standard Socialist Worker license, then and now, is "© Socialist Worker (unless otherwise stated). You may republish if you include an active link to the original." Because this is from 2008 the original is not available but we can include that wording and link to socialistworker.co.uk to satisfy that condition. Fences and windows (talk) 13:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UK Anti Bush visit protest.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 10:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  • I don't believe this objection applies in this case. Protest placards are intended to be photographed and the standard Socialist Worker license, then and now, is "© Socialist Worker (unless otherwise stated). You may republish if you include an active link to the original." Because this is from 2008 the original is not available but we can include that wording and link to socialistworker.co.uk to satisfy that condition. Fences and windows (talk) 13:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Comment The only potentially DW element I see is the photo on George W Bush on one of the placards. If that photo is determined to be a problem, perhaps we can request Graphics Lab replace it with one of the many public domain photos of Mr Bush (eg perhaps one of these Category:Official portraits of George W. Bush); I think this would be preferable to deletion since the image is in use in multiple projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Quelli della notte studio.jpg[edit]

RAI tv channel screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 11:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Red Salute.jpg[edit]

personal unused photos, out of scope ZimskoSonce (talk) 12:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Red satelital.jpg[edit]

Credit: Telesat. https://spacenews.com/telesat-to-announce-manufacturing-plans-for-leo-constellation-in-coming-months/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 12:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:QRM-Messungen HB9BFM.pdf[edit]

No longer needed. It is replaced by a table. The request is made by the "owner" of the document. Hp.Baumeler (talk) 12:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Remix3.jpg[edit]

Avicii copyrighted photo ZimskoSonce (talk) 12:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Akusyu ryouma 20240130 1.jpg[edit]

No FOP Japan. This statue was created in 2011 ([2]). It is copyright protected for at least 70 years. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 12:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:RID v4 Cover.jpg[edit]

book cover https://www.lulu.com/shop/the-fire-within/rolling-in-the-dough-third-edition/paperback/product-23345274.html?page=1&pageSize=4 ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rip.jpg[edit]

source: https://anotherdayinyengerparadise.blogspot.com/2011/09/30-weeks.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by GundaTurnedNeta (talk · contribs)[edit]

images used for propaganda, out of scope

Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rmadan93.jpg[edit]

cropped low quality web photo. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=525709722991883&set=a.525709712991884 ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Roberto Lugo Pottery Saved My Life.jpg[edit]

credit: DAVID MAIALETTI / Staff Photographer https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/roberto-lugo-pottery-ceramics-clay-studio-kensington-20180626.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rogan-art.jpg[edit]

unlikely to be own work. https://shilpkarindicraft.wordpress.com/blog/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ronggengblantek.jpg[edit]

unlikely to be own work. https://riskykusuma.wordpress.com/2013/10/12/tari-yapong-tarian-khas-betawi/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Role of the state in the economy by Prof M N Siddiqui.jpg[edit]

2010 book cover ZimskoSonce (talk) 13:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Timbre kinky Cosy bpost.jpg[edit]

Per: Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Belgium#Stamps Smooth O (talk) 13:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MVAC vaccines image.png[edit]

Doute sur le fait qu'il s'agit réellement d'un travail personnel Ejowan (talk) 13:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,
I have a doubt about this image. It comes from this report, which is licenced under CC-BY-NC, a non-free licence. The uploader's username is "Mohammad K Najjar", and this name does not appear on the report. Can this picture be used on wikipedia? Or should it be deleted?
(I am new, please don't bite me 🥹) Ejowan (talk) 14:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also, is there a way to get the authors authorisation to use this file? Ejowan (talk) 14:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ROYH8967.jpg[edit]

Foto: University of Haifa https://web.archive.org/web/20210209031735/https://historia.nationalgeographic.com.es/a/descifran-uno-dos-ultimos-manuscritos-ineditos-rollos-qumran_12297 ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fabrice Peltier.jpg[edit]

No more usage 83.204.33.197 14:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

vrai De gorostarzu Patricia (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

il n'est plus d'actualité Juchamb (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep COM:INUSE and "outdated" is not a reason for deletion. PaterMcFly (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

plus d'actualité De gorostarzu Patricia (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Justin Currie of Del Amitri in 1984.jpg[edit]

Hi. I uploaded this work myself for use on Wikipedia but didn't think of the ramifications of adding it to the Commons. I'd be very grateful if an administrator would delete it from Wikipedia Commons. Alan Dimmick (talk) 14:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stephen Pastel, Bearsden, 1982.jpg[edit]

Hi. I uploaded this work myself for use on Wikipedia but didn't think of the ramifications of adding it to the Commons. I'd be very grateful if an administrator would delete it from Wikimedia Commons. Alan Dimmick (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:My photography.jpg[edit]

Description says Sorry whose ever this picture was now its mine., TinEye dates it to at least 2013, a year prior to upload at Commons. Belbury (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ROYH6622.jpg[edit]

Photo: Haifa University https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5075684,00.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Principalities of Kyivan Rus' (1054-1132) en.svg[edit]

Duplicate of File:Principalities of Kievan Rus' (1054-1132) ru2.svg editor has been attempting to change the name on english wp against consensus (see Jan 31 edit, [3]). Have left note for editor. Alternative to deletion would be to change the name to the historically correct version.   // Timothy :: talk  14:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rsz 005fj3hngy1fll4enjo43j30wt1d81kx.jpg[edit]

cropped web photo. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/796785359061816942/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rutika.jpg[edit]

unlikely to be own work. https://test-adsever.blogspot.com/2011/01/telugu-actress-ruthika-hot-hq.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 14:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Volker Ratzmann bei Paneldiskussion auf COP28 Dubai-5.12.23.jpeg[edit]

copyvio, no permission of the photographer visible, uploader is the visible person on this image and can't be photographer but was mentioned so Alabasterstein (talk) 14:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Salage au sel de Salies-de-Béarn IGP.jpg[edit]

metadata: Maurice Rougemont. source: https://www.jambon-de-bayonne.com/en/ressources/mediatheque/photos/ (identical metadata) ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Séchage du jambon de Bayonne.jpg[edit]

metadata: Maurice Rougemont ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:SantosCostura.jpg[edit]

Santos Costura BRIDAL SPRING 2020 fashion show https://www.vogue.com/fashion-shows/bridal-spring-2020/santos-costura/slideshow/collection#16 ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:В. Г. Швединова.jpg[edit]

Это не Швединова kosun (talk) 15:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mvp development.jpg[edit]

advertisment / promotional 32.220.245.100 16:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Scoliometro.jpg[edit]

unlikely to be own work. image in better quality: https://www.scoliosissos.com/blog/scoliometer-apps-are-they-worth-trying ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dmitri Korobov 2017.jpg[edit]

Appears to be from https://www.sports.ru/football/person/denis-fomin/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:KNT2020 2120p01.jpg[edit]

Appears to have been previously published at https://namu.wiki/w/%ED%8F%AC%ED%8A%B8%20%EC%95%84%EC%9D%BC%EB%9E%9C%EB%93%9C%EC%84%A0, missing metadata and other useful source info Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Caniche en piscina.jpg[edit]

inappropriate image (only upload free images or in public domain) Basenji1908 (talk) 16:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Madhya Pradesh RELATED INFORMATION.pdf[edit]

Out of scope / copyvio: plain text, unsourced images throughout (some of them with visible copyright notices) Omphalographer (talk) 16:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2nda bandera de la República de la Curva de Maroñas.png[edit]

OOS, non-notable fictional flag, personal fantasy Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bandera propuesta de la República de la Curva de Maroñas.png[edit]

OOS, non-notable fictional flag, personal fantasy -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Women's March 0546 (32337882902).jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:FanimeCon 2016 424 (27405559955).jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Military Parade in Tirana July 28, 1967.jpg[edit]

how come that copyright has expired? Albinfo (talk) 16:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mario Casalongue.jpg[edit]

The person did not authorize the use of this photo 186.141.199.146 17:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not own, robbed. 186.173.213.236 22:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please delete the image Rvpino1975 (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Screenshot 605.png[edit]

(David Berger) Serg Darlin yt video screenshot https://philosophia-perennis.com/2019/05/02/moege-allah-dich-bestrafen-wie-ein-niqab-experiment-zu-gewaltphantasien-bei-youtube-fuehrt/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:صوت ضد الابتزاز.png[edit]

لا اريده مره اخري Isiseg36 (talk) 17:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ACAB en bus de Transantiago.jpg[edit]

Picture of art made by a living artist (https://www.instagram.com/beibiguina/p/B5T8nTrlLmO) Nutshinou Talk! 17:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:გააჯვი.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 17:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Untitled design 4 -removebg-preview.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Capture d’écran du 2021-10-06 18-56-30.png[edit]

Screenshot of File:Fleur de lys du québec.png Iketsi (talk) 17:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Drawing 2.pdf[edit]

Out of scope: incomprehensible mechanical diagram. Description is both seemingly unrelated to the diagram and chemically inaccurate. Omphalographer (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mur des canuts 2024-01-12.jpg[edit]

No response from OTRS, I prefer to have this picture deleted rapidly since I don't know how to credit the creator of the mural (CitéCréation) properly. Thank you. FranCatt (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Banderamarzista.jpg[edit]

Unused fictional flag, OOS, COM:DW of unsourced medal artwork in middle. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sesuratan Memedi.jpg[edit]

source: https://www.facebook.com/296386330727520/posts/seimbangkan-bhuana-agung-dan-bhuana-alitdesa-adat-bungaya-gelar-usaba-mumu-nyomi/765591867140295/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Abm.249 (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kırdık.jpg[edit]

İ wants to delete this picture. No own work 186.173.160.62 18:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep:This picture belongs to me. I don't understand why it was wanted to be deleted. Photo of a local dish made in Van. Samizambak (talk) 18:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jersey Seed Bank.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2ochz.jpg[edit]

Tiny image of irrellevant of library interior. COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 19:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:3ochz.jpg[edit]

Tiny image of irrellevant of library interior. COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 19:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:4ochz.jpg[edit]

Tiny image of irrellevant of library interior. COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:9ochz.jpg[edit]

Tiny image of irrellevant of library interior. COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bookshelf in Russia Library.jpg[edit]

Tiny image of irrellevant of library interior. COM:SCOPE Qualitätssicherung (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gelnhausen Romanische Haus 1881 (Ludwig Bickell).png[edit]

no reason to keep as there is a better version now: File:Romanisches Haus, Gelnhausen (1881).jpg Carl Ha (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Labo Group.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Thanhvd.pgas (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Langfeld Family.pdf[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 19:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The text is a excerpt from the a book in the private collection of the Deppe Family, it was made by an author hired by the Deppe family for the purpose of finding out more about the family. The author investigated the Family and then wrote a book about it, which is now in the private library collection of the Deppe Family. The book is open to the public and can be accessed in person, which is how this scan was attained. The information on the page, is pulled from "Fahne. Chroniken- und Urkundenbücher III" section one of the subtopic "Urkundenbuch des Geschlechts Spade oder spee which is available on this website:
http://digital.ub.uni-duesseldorf.de/ihd/content/pageview/7281926
Other information was sourced from this website:
http://www.maiss-mueller.de/schloesserundherrensitze/wachtendonk/haus-langenfeld/index.html
Furthermore, the author had access to a vast and detailed family tree on ancestry. However, this is family tree is not open to the public. This information attained on this comment stems from my personal connection to the author (Carolina Marques). Natascha.Stone (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Petit pin D2311.jpg[edit]

I am the uploader. I wish to suppress the present photo because I have better ones on the same subject Tangopaso (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PenmanBooks Logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Artur Aigner live in Postgarage Graz.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio, according to the description in the German article "ARAI" Photo by Anna Szalachy] Lutheraner (talk) 20:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Probfly IT.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company user blocked now, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Salomão Zine (talk · contribs)[edit]

private photos and out of scope

LevandeMänniska (talk), 21:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agreed, of no use here. DimiTalen 11:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nude 72-year-old man.jpg[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads LevandeMänniska (talk), 21:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Borrar por la nominación 186.173.186.61 02:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep this is a good quality image of an elderly male human, that could be used to document the aging process Dronebogus (talk) 03:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CFNM nude male and clothed female.jpg[edit]

private photo / no educational value LevandeMänniska (talk), 21:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a classic depiction of CFNM. I could give you lots of details about the location and situation. NudistPhotographer (talk) 00:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Speedy keep COM:INUSE Dronebogus (talk) 03:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Marburg castle northwest c1890.jpg[edit]

we have a higher resolution version: File:Marburg Schloss von NW Ludwig Bickell nach 1890.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 21:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bodhi Tree.png[edit]

Duplicate of File:Bodhi Tree Bookstore - 1970s front of old bldg.jpg that was unnecessarily uploaded for en:Draft:DeVorss & Company (declined) and in PNG format to boot. —holly {chat} 22:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Anton-Maria Habsburg-Lothrigen.jpg[edit]

User request on hrwiki, copy of File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-12086, Rumänien, Hochzeit im Königshaus (cropped).jpg Ponor (talk) 22:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:LHStv. Martin Gruber.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Landeshauptmann_Stellvertreter_Martin_Gruber.jpg M2k~dewiki (talk) 23:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/01/31&oldid=850144149"