Commons:Deletion requests/File:Horse Jumper Of Love La Sotterenea -- 2.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Horse Jumper Of Love La Sotterenea -- 2.png[edit]

Unexploitable picture. The quality is too low. Myloufa (talk) 14:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete See also my comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Horse Jumper Of Love La Sotterenea -- 1.png. Since the only justification for keeping such otherwise poor quality pictures is that there are no better examples, if we're keeping either, it should be the other (marginally better) example, and this one should be deleted. Ubcule (talk) 15:05, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ubcule: Do you know if someone has time to look at over 13 years of crappy pictures by Bull-Doser to nominate what needs to be nominated for deletion? --Myloufa (talk) 16:36, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Myloufa: I think some of the worst examples of car photos have been deleted, but he still constantly uploads new ones with no quality control. (Especially as- unlike in the past- nowadays most of what he uploads already has better examples available, and we don't need another, poorer one with smartphone haze just because it has some random-ass company's livery on it).
His photos of people- ironically- are a more recent development and far worse. (Probably because a lot are taken using smartphone cameras under low light conditions). Almost all would warrant deletion if- as in most cases- they weren't the sole examples of those people on Commons. (I'm assuming these people *are* notable, as I'm not generally familiar enough with Quebecois culture and local celebrities to judge otherwise.)
You're free to nominate them if you think you have a case, though. Ubcule (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]