Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcuts: COM:AN/U • COM:ANU • COM:ANI

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section] 		User problems
[new section] 		Blocks and protections
[new section] 		Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Translate this page
COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES (index)

Note

  • Before reporting one or more users here, try to resolve the dispute by discussing with them first. (Exception: obvious vandal accounts, spambots, etc.)
  • Keep your report as short as possible, but include links as evidence.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/U|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
  • It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; Please try to remain civil with your comments.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.

FYI: So many socks[edit]

I have requested Check user at meta and found many socks. A few of them already uploaded some images that were deleted and again uploaded here. Rest of the images are clear copyvio.

Group 1

SwamyAyya566 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , ஸ்டீவன் ஸ்கால் (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , AryaPadaiKadanthaAurelius (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , DonParlo (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , كريشنا الداعي (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 

Group 2

17289ha (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , Tamil career advise (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , சூர்யநாராயணன் (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , 1gy9No (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , Edu-info-goodwriting (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , Btytatg (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 

I hope admins can take proper action. AntanO 14:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@AntanO: it is not clear exactly what action you are requesting. Deletion of all uploads by these accounts as copyvios, or something else? - Jmabel ! talk 00:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Usually, we have to tag for deletion. Is it possible to delete copyvios images that already deleted, and uploaded again by 17289ha (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . Also, screen capture images found at Btytatg (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . ஸ்டீவன் ஸ்கால் (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  and AryaPadaiKadanthaAurelius (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  also uploaded copyvios. In addition, is it possible to block these IDs due to copyvios and socks that found at Meta? AntanO 05:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Every copyvivo in meta is deleted. I just learnt that these should be uploaded in wikipidea, as non-free images with appropriate tags, logo, etc. And that 2 svg images are not copyvivo as code is modified (more than 50%). Others can be deleted. Sorry

17289ha (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I still don't understand exactly what is being requested here. If some other admin understands, would you please say so here and take this on? Thanks. - Jmabel ! talk 20:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jmabel: This appears to be a request for blocks and upload reviews here on Commons. The checkuser page on meta implicated locked account Tyih, so I created m:srg#Global lock for socks of Tyih.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Shaiksadikace2king[edit]

Shaiksadikace2king (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  Upload advertising file. メイド理世 (talk) 09:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Blocked by Taivo. Yann (talk) 11:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah, uploaded lots of spam, they got deleted with warning, uploaded the same spam again. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Kursant504[edit]

Hello,
I strongly suspect that the user Kursant504 lacks neutrality in the Russo-Ukrainian conflict.
This Russian user requests, in the majority of his contributions, the removal of images. However, all these images have one thing in common: they all have an informative character about the war in Ukraine and most are part of the Ukrainian public domain.
Some were taken by a member of the Ukrainian army and are, in my opinion, correctly labeled as such at the level of Ukrainian copyright.
Some have been placed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license by their author on the original media and are correctly labeled as such on Commons.
I have not had time to check all his deletion requests, but I think they should all be replaced at most by the {{license review}} template or simply refused.
What should one do when suspecting such an abuse?
Thank you for your response.
Christian28TMA (talk) 14:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"I have not had time to check all his deletion requests, but I think they should all be replaced ... or simply refused." it sounds like a very reasonable request...Kursant504 (talk) 15:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You don't have to eat a whole egg to know it's bad. - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You forgot to mention that many pro-Ukraine Wikimedians agree that many of the photos are copyright violations, such as User:Abzeronow. My living in Russia is utterly irrelavent. If a photo has a label as being free because it was allegedly posted on a particular website, but the photo is not anywhere on said website, then it is proper to nominate it for deletion. If there is a contradiction in the license labels with one source saying commercial use is prohibited and another says it is free, it is fine to have a deletion discussion. If my Ukrainian photo deletion nominations are anti-Ukrainian, then my Russian photo deletion nominations are anti-Russian. We should all agree regardless of political affiliation that copyrighted works are bad for Commons because it deceives people about the copyright status of a photo. I would also like to note that a different editor demanded I get a very harsh block for deletion nominations that admins agreed were absolutely perfect and were eventually deleted (I wrongly assumed that I would not need to spoon-feed other editors an explanations of why colorizations are DWs - that means derivative works). Here are some examples of Russian copyright violations that I nominated for deletion using equally valid arguments as my ones on Ukrainian photos:
Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-R80329,_Josef_Stalin.jpg
Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Анна_Ивановна_Щетинина.jpg
Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Maguba_Syrtlanova_awards_(2022-03-01)_02.jpg
Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Brujas_de_la_Noche.jpg
my, as you will say, "anti-Russian" DRs of poster with russian's army hero Commons:Deletion requests/File:A-davydov.jpg
and russian military photos Commons:Deletion requests/Fotos taken not from Mil.ru
and an "anti-French" one too Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Roger_sauvage_pilote_04959.jpg Kursant504 (talk) 03:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment A visit to the user page of Kursant504 on the Russian version of Wikipedia is very informative about his motivations regarding the war in Ukraine: he was blocked for contribution paid after numerous edit wars aimed at removing information about the war in Ukraine : User Kursant504
Christian28TMA (talk) 12:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So what? You think that Ukrainians are either incapable of violating copyright, or are entitled to a special treatment exemption because of the war? Should only ethnic Ukrainians be allowed to nominate Ukrainian photos for deletion? That would be racism. But no, you just want to infest Commons with copyright violations because you want it to be an archive instead of what it is supposed to be - a database of legally FREE photos. You literally lied here and said I only nominate Ukrainian photos for deletion, and yet you have the nerve to comment in my deletion discusion about a photo of Stalin to lecture me on how you think Russian grammar works. You owe me and apology for lying about me, and the entire Russian people for treating us like we a stupid people who don't know how our own language works and do not have the right to write by Russian grammar rules. You have no ground to stand on here, because many pro-Ukraine users agree that I am right about copyright (pun intended) and most of my deletion nominations are successful (and even the unsucessful ones have legitimate evidence of copyright violation). Why don't you go back to pretending that Fyodor Ivanovich Kislov was a German State photographer and pretending that Ukrainian logo watermarks magically evaporate copyright? Kursant504 (talk) 12:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment How do you justify, Kursant504, on the Russian language Wikipedia, the four reminders of Wikipedia’s rules, the nine edit wars, the three blocks, including the last one for paid contribution, all in 20 months, and all concerning the war in Ukraine? Does someone have a grudge against you?
Christian28TMA (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kursant504 and Christian28TMA: I strongly suggest to both of you that if you don't want to be blocked, stop attacking each other's character.
I don't see an administrative issue here at this time.
It is possible that Kursant504 is being more aggressive on copyright issues for Ukraine than he would be elsewhere. That's not actively commendable, but it's not something that calls for a sanction. If he was repeatedly making nominations few of which had merit, that would be a problem, but that doesn't seem to be the case. - Jmabel ! talk 22:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete Silsilah Kiagus Muh.Saleh.jpg[edit]

Please delete image Silsilah Kiagus Muh.Saleh.jpg, because his lineage has been corrected by lineage expert Kyai Saleh Lateng, Updated image article File:Silsilah_Kyai_Saleh_Lateng.png Kiagus Syarkawi (talk) 02:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  1. File:Silsilah Kyai Saleh Lateng.png is illegible to the point of being useless.
  2. If you want to nominate an image for deletion, please start a normal deletion request.
  3. You might consider using {{Fact disputed}} on the file page if you believe a file is factually wrong.
  4. There is no administrative issue here, and certainly not a problem with some user's behavior, which is what this page is for. - Jmabel ! talk 06:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Socks and personal image : FYI[edit]

வா செ செல்வம் (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , Dr V S Selvam (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , டாக்டர் வா.செ.செல்வம் (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , தென்னை மருத்துவர் (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , டாக்டர் வா.செ.செல்வம் (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , Sathish1110 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 

I have blocked the above IDs in ta.wiki, and I see some of them are blocked here. Can admin delete these users' uploads under F10 and/or G10. Just a file remains here. AntanO 09:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Il Nur[edit]

Il Nur (talk · contribs) removes deletion templates from their non-sourced derivatives. Quick1984 (talk) 16:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quick1984[edit]

Quick1984 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  выставляет мои работы на удаление, хотя я их делал сам, у меня есть карта России, откуда я вырезаю нужные регионы. Также он выставляет на удаление файли из ЖЖ, где автор разрешал их загружать в Викисклад и там у него свободная лицензия https://acer120.livejournal.com/168185.html. Прошу заблокировать данного Вандала. --Il Nur (talk) 16:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

he puts my works up for deletion, although I did them myself, I have a map of Russia, from where I cut out the necessary regions. He also exposes files from LiveJournal for deletion, where the author allowed them to be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and there he has a free license https://acer120.livejournal.com/168185.html. Please block this Vandal--Il Nur (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Il Nur, At first, watch your tongue. Secondly, what do you mean saying ‘I have a map of Russia’? Are you it’s author or copyright holder? Try reading COM:DW. --Quick1984 (talk) 16:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Да, у меня есть карта России, сделанная в ручную. Если карту России нельзя загружать, тогда выставляй на удаление все карты по России (Category:Maps of ethnic groups in Russia), всех авторов. И всех стран. (Yes, I have a map of Russia made by hand. If the map of Russia cannot be uploaded, then put all maps of Russia up for deletion) Il Nur (talk) 17:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Il Nur:
  1. Unless a deletion template came from a vandalism-only account, or something of the sort (clearly not the case here) you should not be removing it unilaterally. You may turn it into a full DR to start a discussion. If you continue to remove these unilaterally you will be blocked. And similarly for calling a user a "vandal" who clearly is not.
  2. "у меня есть карта России" is very vague. "Have" as in you drew it from scratch by hand, or what? Any map is to some extent based on prior maps. If the maps it derived from were copyrighted, there may be a problem here. It really helps to start from outline maps etc. that are clearly in the public domain of have clear rights. Is your master map available in some form online (even without a general license to reuse that master map?
Jmabel ! talk 02:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Нет, моя основная карта не в интернете. Даже в этой категории Category:Maps of ethnic groups in Russia, много карт нарисованные на основе других карт, почему они тогда не выставляются на удаление? Il Nur (talk) 05:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Чем мои карты отличаются от этой и других карт? File:Mari people in Mari El by settlements.svg Il Nur (talk) 05:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you think it is correct, you can delete all the files. I don't have any extra time or desire to do this. I think this participant is just chasing me and several other participants from Tatarstan, and most likely this new participant, judging by the manner of speech of User:RedBull1984. Who, in different Wikimedia projects and in different language sections under different nicknames, investigates and conflicts with Tatarstan participants, promoting pro-Russian imperial sentiments. I have no other explanations for the electability of nominating only one participant to remove similar works. Although there are full maps of regions on Wikimedia Commons, even downloaded from the works of acer120.--Il Nur (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Weird Myanmar military-related swath of deletion requests[edit]

I was closing some deletion requests on the January 27th, 2024 list when I happened upon a large number of deletion requests by Dane-3051 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log). Most of these requests were alleging copyright violations (usually cited as being from Facebook). Nearly all were images of military equipment from Myanmar. The files were primarily uploaded by three users: Haruno Sakura from Team-7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log), TTL(Facebook) (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log), and KMK from Myanmar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) (though there are some of Dane-3051's own images which were nominated for deletion as copyvios too!). None of these nominations provide any evidence and some were blatantly false (such as nominating US Navy images with US Navy EXIF). The attribution to Facebook also seemed suspicious because Facebook strips out camera EXIF and yet all the images contained consistent camera EXIF with other images uploaded contemporaneously by the users. I noted that two of the uploaders do not have a spotless record when it comes to copyvios. I did a few spot checks with reverse image search and none of the chosen images came back as a hit. I voted keep on most of the DRs, but I would like someone else to take a closer look in case I am missing something. There is still something that seems off about this on both sides. Some of the later images I commented on seemed difficult for a civilian to obtain and some are of oddly low quality despite having good resolution. They are educationally quite valuable images though (many are heavily in use) and it is worth being deliberate about this I think. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Haruno Sakura from Team-7[edit]

I checked Haruno Sakura's uploads and concluded that (s)he forged the metadata. According to metadata, all photos was taken on the device Gionee P5 mini. The Gionee P5mini is a smartphone released in April 2016 with 5MP (2,560 x 1,920 px) camera[1]. Oddly, most of the photos were timestamped before 2016, and all of them exceed the maximum dimensions.
Here is an example:
File:MA-firetruck.jpg
  • Camera model : P5 mini
  • Create Date : 2018:12:16 09:01:37
  • Exposure Time  : 1/33
  • F Number  : 2.8
  • ISO  : 81
  • Image Size  : 4000x2668
corresponds to a photo from Myanmar government website.
  • Camera model : NIKON D810
  • Create Date : 2018:09:25 09:50:04
  • Exposure Time  : 1/80
  • F Number  : 5.6
  • ISO  : 2000
  • Image Size  : 2000x1333
And another example is File:MA-Type-81-MLR.jpg, corresponding to a photo published on blogspot in 2014. The text has been intentionally cropped out. 0x0a (talk) 18:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Impressive work. Thank you. I have deleted the images from User:Haruno Sakura from Team-7. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I blocked "Haruno Sakura from Team-7" for a month. Faking EXIF data is a malicious attempt to hide copyvios, and is a no-no. I would even support an indef. block as VOA, as no real useful edit by this account. Yann (talk) 08:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

TTL(Facebook) & KMK from Myanmar[edit]

 Comment: GPS coordinates points of photos from both TTL(Facebook) (talk · contribs), and KMK from Myanmar (talk · contribs) are pointing the exact same location. Probably they are the same user or they forged the metadata with the same method. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 10:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That would be a reason for a block. Could you please create a request for check user with all the evidence? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:12, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A checkuser request has been created. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 13:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Yann: The evidence was stale, please handle based on behavior.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I believe the two users, like Haruno Sakura, also falsified the metadata and scaled-up the photos. Metadata shows that their photos were taken with vivo 1811 mobile phone. This phone was released in November 2018, according to the website. There's suspicion that the timestamps of many of KMK from Myanmar's photos show that they were taken before that date.

This photo "File:Shaanxi SX-21090 Myanmar Army.jpg" uploaded by TTL(Facebook) was posted on Blogspot as early as 2014, not 2019 as he claimed. Likewise, photo "File:Inlay Jeep-2.jpg" was prevoiusly posted on a forum in March 2020. 0x0a (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, based on this, I blocked "TTL(Facebook)" for a month, and deleted these 2 files. Any evidence for "KMK from Myanmar"? Similarity of geolocation is not really an evidence. If they are 2 persons in the same unit, they could have similar pictures with the same geolocation. Yann (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I replied at COM:Deletion requests/File:MA-MAM-01.jpg and COM:Deletion requests/File:MA-KS-1M-2.jpg. 0x0a (talk) 09:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@0x0a: Thanks. It seems Dane-3051 was right about these two. @IronGargoyle: Does the upscaling explain "oddly low quality despite having good resolution"?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It should be noted that မင်းရာဇာ (talk · contribs), an alternate account of KMK from Myanmar (talk · contribs), stole a photo from Getty Images in the same way. 0x0a (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Blocked for socking. Files mentioned above deleted. Yann (talk) 12:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
sorry to re-open this thread. There is two more users who uploaded Myanmar military-related photos with the same vivo 1811 phone. Please also check the uploads of Tabinshwehti (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) and Myo Sann (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log). Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 14:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Both blocked. Yann (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ninjastrikers: I reverse searched the remaining uploads by Myo Sann, but found no earlier hits. That might be because Facebook banned Myanmar military-linked pages in 2021. I'm not sure if forging metadata is a sufficient reason to nominate them for deletion. 0x0a (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@0x0a: That would be enough as a violation of COM:EVID policy, but Yann blocked them already.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Diniyar Khasanov[edit]

Diniyar Khasanov (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) Continuous unfounded accusations of vandalism [2] [3] , despite explanations received from the administrator Jmabel: [4]. Quick1984 (talk) 08:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do not pretend that you are conducting this activity with good intentions. Diniyar Khasanov (talk) 09:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done? One week block. Taivo (talk) 12:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Czarnybog[edit]

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    • What do You mean by "continued uploading" and "final warning"? I uploaded it only once after it was deleted and I don't recall any "final warning". From what I understood, deleted image didn't explain permission to use properly so I uploaded again with better licence template. I couldn't participate in deletion discussion since it was deleted expressly. I'm sorry, I understand from the "Please do not recreate deleted content" note in my discussion that appeared after I re-uploaded that I should have used "Undeletion requests" instead. I understand my mistake but please don't claim that I am some kind of recidivist. --Czarnybog (talk) 23:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • What Jeff meant by "final warning" was the warning that A1Cafel put on your talk page in 2021. I think enough time has passed between that and this incident (which I did promptly send a warning about when it was brought to my attention) that I think the new warning suffices for now. But I'd welcome input from an uninvolved party. Abzeronow (talk) 23:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      @Czarnybog: You have five notices of copyright infringement (plus DR notices) on your user talk page. Which part of special:diff/575851014 and the warning you got when attempting upload did you not understand? Also, the DR ran for almost three months.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • A1Cafel is a person that at that time has been found to be abusing their authority and was banned from any sort of deletion procedure. We had whole discussion about it here - Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 93#A1Cafel_and_yet_more_abusive_deletions - and there is even my explanation in mentioned discussion. I was accused for copyright infringement and warned after I cropped images that were on Wikimedia for a long time and only later have been found to be in violation of copyright. I was basically paying for someone else's mistakes and I shouldn't have got that warning and there is community consensus about it approved by administrator. Don't tell me now that I'm still paying for A1Cafel's random deletion spree in 2021. One thing Jeff is right about. The deletion request about image re-uploaded by me was hanging there for 5 months, sorry, I got confused. Still, I don't understand why Jeff mentioned I have Deletion Request notices on my Talk page. How is that an argument for putting me on noticeboard? It's a common procedure and all of us got such notices. Even Jeff, I checked. --Czarnybog (talk) 00:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done. Technically this is really uploading copyvio after last warning, which generally brings a block. Nevertheless I forgive Czarnybog the last time and will explain in his talkpage the situation. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Jonathan el Yoni arenas[edit]

Jonathan el Yoni arenas (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  Hello All,

I am writing because the user @Jonathan el Yoni arenas: is still uploading material, he is not the author without authorization, even after all his wrongly attributed pictures are once again deleted [5]. Would it be possible to help with the situation, please? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@CoffeeEngineer: I notified the user of this discussion on their user talk page, as you should have done per the above.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
pour quelle raison faite vous cela ? Jonathan el Yoni arenas (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
To protect Commons and French Wikipedia.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Boryviterixvi[edit]

Boryviterixvi (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Uploaded files with Copyright status. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for a week. @Микола Василечко: You should inform users when you report them here. Yann (talk) 18:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

Please see File_talk:Terminologiaondo.jpg and the file page’s history. I could reinstate the removed categorization and incurr in edit warring myself, or I could come here and report

for edit warring. Flipped a coin. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Or Tuválkin could have started a new discussion about the category in question (or can still do so), what my advice was, since (s)he apparently did not agree with the outcome of Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/10/Category:Terminology. Since there was no such new discussion in over a month, I went on implementing these outcomes. JopkeB (talk) 02:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disruptive IP[edit]

Could somebody kindly deal with the IP making death threats on my talk page, and also trying to hack my account? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done, @Ritchie333, an administrator blocked the IPs. I hide the revisions which include their threats. Best wishes. Kadı Message 18:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:AK Photography 01[edit]

AK Photography 01 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  this new user uploads photos from unknown sources but calling his own work without META data to prove it. I flag them but an administrator should have a look. Pierre cb (talk) 18:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Comment Already warned. I deleted obvious copyvios. @Pierre cb: For other files, it would be better to flag them with "no permission" rather than "no source". Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Question I'm confused by @AK Photography 01: using file names like File:Bollywood Actress Medha Shankar & BJP Leader Shrey Mallick during the promotion of '𝟏𝟐𝐭𝐡 𝐅𝐚𝐢𝐥' movie.jpg. I'm not very familiar with Indian politics, but that person doesn't seem to be the leader of the BJP. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 04:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
FWIW, AK Photography 01 appears to be one of many single-purpose accounts involved in the cross-wiki promotion of two (possibly non-notable?) individuals: Shrey Mallick and Srijan Mallick. Marbletan (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Counterfeit Purses[edit]

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jeff G. Is this really the right place to be making jokes? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Counterfeit Purses: Not a joke.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Jeff G. My username does not promote the theft of intellectual property, but let's say it did. Let's say it was "Download movies from the internet" or "IgnoreCopyrightLaws". How would that violate COM:IU? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 18:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Counterfeit Purses: People might come to you trying to buy counterfeit purses.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Jeff G. This is just dumb. Please think before you report people for "user problems" Counterfeit Purses (talk) 21:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I would say that unless there were some evidence that this user's activity here had something to do with counterfeit purses (it doesn't), there is no problem here, any more than there would be a problem with a user name like "Slayer Joe", "Street-fighting man", or "Trespassers W". - Jmabel ! talk 20:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This seems completely frivolous, and akin to saying The Squirrel Conspiracy's name promotes clandestine coordination of harmful acts. No reasonable person would consider this name a call to infringement of trade dress or a solicitation in the absence of corresponding edits/uploads, as is the case here. There's no COM:IU issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cumbuco Silva[edit]

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Bekbal[edit]

Bekbal (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) Recent batch of copyvios after long history of warnings and deletions. Quick1984 (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done, the user was not warned previously, but considering large number of copyvios and 0 extant uploads I decided to block him/her for a week. Taivo (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Sabil_Khoer_Al_Munawar[edit]

User is likely to have uploaded a large number of non-free images. I only spot-checked a few, and most of them turned out not to be his own work. 0x0a (talk) 19:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Xoere[edit]

Xoere (talk · contribs) has uploaded several flags and other insignia and claimed them to be their "own work". This isn't accurate, so should some of these files be deleted? Kk.urban (talk) 20:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

However, it is possible that they created some of them themself. Kk.urban (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kk.urban: you seem to have made no effort to resolve this with the user yourself, nor did you notify them on their talk page that you posted this here (I'll do that). - Jmabel ! talk 20:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Jmabel Correct, I made no effort to resolve it with the user myself, because I thought it didn't really matter what the user thought about the topic, I was just asking if some of these images could be deleted. Kk.urban (talk) 21:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Most of these are probably fine (certainly an SVG accurately representing a 19th-century flag cannot be a problem, for example). I suspect these are "own work" in the sense that the user created SVGs from scratch, but in some cases (e.g. File:Flag of keller.svg) these may be derivative of copyrighted works. Certainly not an administrative issue, though some of these probably should be nominated for deletion. Jmabel ! talk 20:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dashtshuleeg[edit]

Dashtshuleeg (talk · contribs) reiteratedly trolling, creating pointless deletion requests, not here to help. Bedivere (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Comment This seems to be a confused newbie. Sent 2 warnings. Yann (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They've continued to make pointless nominations after the warnings Bedivere (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disruptive deletion of content[edit]

Szymon Bielecki (talk · contribs) continued to delete information from the documentation of {{Paris transit icons/doc}} without explanation, despite me warning the user not to do that. I wish for assistance as I do not want to risk an edit war by reverting again and then the user doing the same problematic edits. --Minoa (talk) 07:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Minoa: I rolled back those edits and sent the user a standard vandalism warning.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Jeff G.: Thank you for stepping in. Best, --Minoa (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Minoa: You're welcome.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anon editor making disruptive DR requests[edit]

14.200.225.254 (talk · contribs) has been making a few non-sense DR requests ([6][7][8][9], just to list a few). Their latest one, they seem to show a lack of understanding or just completely trolling. Not only voting on their own nomination but closing a request and also reverting a good-faith editor and admin who removed the closure with a problematic edit summary. Bidgee (talk) 22:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not intending to violate the TOS, I'm just trying to make sure that there are no violations related to files on Commons:Licensing. I'm a humble person who doesn't like any violations on commons 14.200.225.254 23:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The whole reason is because I am making sure that the respective items are complying with their respective licenses correctly.
I'm sorry.
For everything 14.200.225.254 23:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Block, although I think more will be needed in the future.
I think that this is the same Australian IP editor who has been attracting attention lately for some railway-related editing 'against consensus'. Their behaviour on just this one DR has been problematic, especially given that their same incorrect rationale (copyrighted media needs to be deleted from Commons) has been used over a bunch of DRs recently. Even when corrected on these, they keep using it. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

GokuJuan[edit]

GokuJuan (talk · contribs) has just left two long messages with insults that violate the rules of civility (including intimidation demanding unblocking on Wikipedia in Spanish) for the simple fact of having detected some images with a dubious license (including a TV capture). The user is banned from other projects for unacceptable behavior and insults. Taichi (talk) 23:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI: This user is banned only on eswiki for being a sockpuppet (further details not specified). A09 (talk) 23:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@A09: GokuJuan is the master, was blocked as IP and also had a sock. But the main problem is about threats to users. Taichi (talk) 02:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&oldid=850421129"