User talk:Mormegil

Archives 2008-03-07 2010-02-26 2014-04-11

---

Licence - dotaz

Ahoj Mormegile, narazil jsem na šablonu Template:PD-EU-no author disclosure a přiznám se, že mi není úplně jasné, v čem se vlastně liší od Template:Anonymous-EU. Můžeš mi to nějak přiblížit? Předem díky! --Gampe (talk) 03:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Snažil jsem se nějaký rozdíl najít, ale marně. Ostatně, stejná otázka se ±bezvýsledně diskutovala na Template talk:PD-EU-no author disclosure#Template:Anonymous-EU a Template talk:Anonymous-EU#PD-EU-no author disclosure. Řekl bych, že mezi nimi momentálně žádný zřetelný rozdíl není a měly by se sloučit. --Mormegil (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Rekategorizace zamčeného obrázku

Ahoj, můžeš prosím rekategorizovat obr. se zámkem dle E-MB-Moser-20100819.gif (+2 kat a - norské akademiky, které jsem přidal k daným osobám). Díky.--Kacir (talk) 23:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done (A jinak lze k tomu využít {{Editprotected}}.) --Mormegil (talk) 10:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Díky, o té šabloně jsem nevěděl. Vidím, že se během noci u souboru objevil požadavek na OTRS, takže obrázky budou s největší pravděpodobností smazány. Doklad o svolení skutečně chybí.--Kacir (talk) 17:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Licence u obrázku

Ahoj, uvažoval jsem o tomto obrázku jako WP:OT, ale mám pochybnosti o licenci (volné dílo). Je to v pořádku? IMHO nikoli. Díky.--Kacir (talk) 18:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Ano, máš samozřejmě pravdu, to je zcela zjevně nesmysl. I vzhledem ke zmatené historii souboru, ve které uživatel průběžně měnil licenční šablony a informace o původu souboru, je vidět, že patrně vůbec netuší, která bije. Soubor jdu smazat, tady vážně není co řešit. (A taky se jdu podívat na ostatní soubory načtené tímto uživatelem, vypadá, že o autorském právu má poněkud zmatenou představu.) Díky za upozornění. --Mormegil (talk) 10:39, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Díky. Vidím, že jsi to vyřešil rychle.--Kacir (talk) 13:40, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Znaky obcí

Ahoj, stránka meta:Wikimedia Czech Republic/Právo (odkazovaná z Template:PD-CzechGov) je vedena jako archivovaná, tak píšu rovnou tobě, protože jsi tam uveden. Do OTRS došel mail ohledně znaku File:Znak obce Dambořice.svg, že má mít nějaký trochu jiný tvar, než jak je nahrán na Commons a v REKOSu (to teď není podstatné). Pán ovšem na konci mailu informoval, že znaky mohou být používány pouze se souhlasem obce. Když jsem mu napsal odkaz na AZ č. 121/2000 Sb., § 3, odstavec a) (státní symbol a symbol jednotky územní samosprávy), tak odpověděl, že tou územní jednotkou samosprávy je kraj, nikoliv obec a odkázal na zákon o obcích č. 128/2000 Sb., § 34a, odstavec 3) (Obce a jimi zřízené nebo založené organizační složky a právnické osoby mohou užívat znak a vlajku obce. Jiné subjekty mohou užívat znak obce jen s jejím souhlasem. K užívání vlajky obce není nutný její souhlas.). Z mého laického pohledu, pokud nejsou k tomu žádné další předpisy, to vypadá, že by se asi měly všechny znaky smazat... Jak to tedy je, co s tím? --Harold (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Z hlediska autorského práva je to jednoduché: Znak obce je jakožto úřední dílo vyňat z ochrany právem autorským. Vedle toho však v Česku existuje speciální veřejnoprávní ochrana znaku obce založená oním zákonem o obcích. Tato ochrana je krásným příkladem něčeho, čemu se na Commons říká non-copyright restrictions. Z hlediska Commons je tedy problém vyřešen: dílo není autorskoprávně chráněno, může být na Commons (ideálně pak označeno nějakou šablonou, která upozorňuje na omezení v jeho používání). Jinou věcí je využití těch znaků např. v článcích na Wikipedii. Existují názory, že takové použití vskutku porušuje zákon a Wikipedie by s tím měla přestat. Podle jiných názorů není čistě informativní vyobrazení znaku obce ve zřetelně encyklopedickém článku „užitím znaku“ ve smyslu onoho zákona. Na Wikipedii se o tom již několikrát vedly nějaké diskuse, viz např. cs:Wikipedie:Pod lípou (práva)/Archiv 2010/01#Svolení pro vlajky a znaky obcí. --Mormegil (talk) 10:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

apologies

I was trying to narrow a search and clicked on something I should not have done. Many apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cg2p0B0u8m (talk • contribs)

File:HP kdysi.jpg

Hello Mormegil! Could you please have a look at this photo and ask the uploader to provide more information? Currently the file is undergoing a deletion request after been speedy tagged. I think (hope) it could be PD due to age but I couldn't find any references to this photo. Díky! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

User:Jan Polák already tried to ask the user to add the required information. --Mormegil (talk) 10:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Famous people

Related to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 52#Any Czech-speaking administrator?, Commons:Categories for discussion/2014/09/Category:Houses by association. --ŠJů (talk) 20:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

I was away for a while so I couldn't reply, thus I reply now because the original discussion has been archived. As you know well, deleting anything associated with "famous people" had a rationale because it is about an arbitrary definition (famous for who? If we talk about Beethoven fine, but when the thing is less obvious we are going to open a Pandora's box of criticism and POVs). A fair definition could be Houses by person who lived in or similar (but I guess that in order to choose the form Jim Woodward could help us because he is a native speaker of English). -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 16:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Maybe "Houses by famous occupant"? Or maybe "Residences by occupant", with the assumption that no building will go in the category unless an occupant was famous. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

I can assure you that my house will never end up in such category, Jim ;-) -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 20:52, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Mormegil, could be fine "Residences by occupant"? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 18:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Jameslwoodward, Blackcat, for the continuing discussion, please do reopen the improperly closed CfDs or open a new CfD and join the discussion there. Do not shatter the discussion to the user discussion pages, do not bypass the previous participants of the discusions. As it was mentioned in the previsous discussions repeatedly, the problem is that all item categories of houses of famous people were moved to quasi-meta-categories, although they were indented and really used also for files, not only for subcategories. Conversion of these item categories to meta-categories was never discussed and never consented – just contrarily, the relevant warning was ignored by the CfD closer. And generally, we don't need to sort all houses by their current occupant – we need to assemble such houses which are important and interesting due to importance of their one-time inhabitants. Egalitarianism have some its assets but in this case, it is not a good basis for categorization. --ŠJů (talk) 20:31, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

ŠJů, the community has talked about the use of famous people. Deal with it. If we are going to face a name change, it's out of question to reuse the expression famous people. What's not clear? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 11:20, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

The community (two participants of the original discussion) mentioned in the discussion that "There are a few subcats that arguably have some value and could be kept." There was no consensus to move the subcats to strange, meaningless and confusing names nor to converse these item categories to meta-categories (or even quasi-meta-categories). However, the CfD was closed neglectfully, without consensual (or at least reasonable) resolution in this problem. Generally, it's not acceptable to decise about a category without consider its value in relation to its real purposes and its real content, including its subcats. CfDs should be not closed with such ignorance. The problem should be discussed by colleagues which are able to understand the problem, and the discussion should be closed by an experienced user which meet the same criterion and understands arguments and proposals of all participants very highly, and should be responsible, should not to abuse his admin rights to force his personal ill-conceived and inconsensual opinion, causing needless edit wars. --ŠJů (talk) 23:18, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Shortcut2/cs

Template:Shortcut2/cs has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 08:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:User_cs-N

User cs-N has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

111.161.127.218 00:09, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Loga

Ahoj, chtěl bych si jen potvrdit, že např. logo STANu je volné dílo, tedy odpovídá daným licencím. Podobná loga, obsahující jen text a obrazce, zde byla mazána, např. Logo roland garros, takže jsem dosud vycházel z této zkušenosti. Díky.--Kacir (talk) 10:42, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

P.S. Abych zůstal u sportu, ponecháno bylo Czech Cycling Tour.png, ač ve zdrojové stránce stojí: Použití fotografií a jiného materiálu je možné jen s písemným souhlasem TTV sport group s.r.o. Vidím, že naopak bylo smazáno logo ČSSD, které obsahovalo jen text; zřejmě dvojí přístup.--Kacir (talk) 11:21, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Obávám se, že k tomu nemám moc co říct. Dle mého zcela soukromého a prakticky nepotvrzeného názoru je pro použití {{PD-textlogo}} v českém prostředí laťka mnohem výš, než se na Commons praktikuje, resp. pro česká loga bych ho nepoužíval prakticky vůbec. Ale v zásadě mi naprosto není jasné, jak na Commons prakticky funguje rozhodování o COM:TOO, přijde mi, že žádný systém na to moc neexistuje (takže zdaleka ne „dvojí přístup“ – přístupů je tolik, kolik je uživatelů). Jenže na jeho potenciální nastavení by asi bylo potřeba něco striktně definovat, což je právě u takové otázky značný problém. --Mormegil (talk) 21:41, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Díky za info, alespoň se tím budu řídit a podobné soubory neoznačovat. Dvojím přístupem jsem měl na mysli výsledný stav – ponecháno/smazáno.--Kacir (talk) 07:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete request

Mohl bých poprosit o smazání těchto souborů: File:Kříž k Miroslavi – 05.jpg a File:Nový Poddvorov fgfgfgfg.jpg? Díky. Dominikmatus (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Mormegil (talk) 13:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Bankovky ČNB

Ahoj, před časem jsem horoval za nehmotné reprodukce CZK měny. S lítostí jsem zaznamenal, že všechny bankovky v kategorii:Banknotes of the Czech Republic více či méně porušují vyhlášku ČNB. Problém by mohl nastat zejména po vytištění. Přes bankovku by měl být nápis VZOR či SPECIMEN. Jako nejproblémovější ale vidím soubor:5 000 czk note 2009.jpg, který má navíc vysoké rozlišení. S pozdravem. --Rosičák (talk) 16:46, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

@Rosičák: Ano, máte pravdu, že ty obrázky příslušnou vyhlášku nedodržují. Ty obrázky by taky měly být všechny označeny pomocí {{PD-money-CZ}}. Taky by se dalo jít a obrázky nahradit verzemi splňujícími ona pravidla. --Mormegil (talk) 14:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

why

why you have deleted the file Nobel_Prize.png with making any contact with me? this file was present on only eng wiki so i only transferred it here.--محمد افضل (talk) 12:42, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

@محمد افضل: I have explained the deletion in the deletion reason: The Nobel Prize medal is a copyrighted artistic work by the Swedish sculptor and engraver Erik Lindberg (1873–1966). It is not free content, it is fully protected by copyright until 2037, so that we cannot have it here. The English Wikipedia has different rules than Wikimedia Commons, so that it can host it there. But the file is marked with “This file will not be in the public domain in its home country until January 1, 2037 and should not be transferred to Wikimedia Commons until that date, as Commons requires that images be free in the source country and in the United States.” there, so please, do not transfer it here again. --Mormegil (talk) 13:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

I need your help!

I need your help to change to the new picture. Can you please help me? Line 8 the Pink (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

@Line 8 the Pink: If you want to change a specific image used in a specific article on a wiki, you need to edit the article on the wiki and replace the used image, just as you did on enwiki. Replacing images on Commons with a completely different image on the same topic is not allowed. --Mormegil (talk) 09:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Line 8 the Pink (talk) 23:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC) So now on, can you please delete this picture? I want to replace it as a passerine because passerine is the most like a true bird.Line 8 the Pink (talk) 23:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don’t undestand. We have File:Avian cloaca.jpg and we have File:Dunnocks cloaca pecking.jpg. Both are valid files conforming to the Commons project scope, and we are keeping them here. Whether you do or do not want to use one of them, you can, that is no reason to delete the other. And I repeat for the last time: please DO NOT OVERWRITE one of the files with the other. If you keep on doing that, you might be blocked. --Mormegil (talk) 10:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Translation needed:

Hi! Could you please translate this watchlist notice into cz? Thanks in advance! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

[[Commons:Photo challenge]]''': Time to vote for [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - January - Diagonals/Voting|'''Diagonals''' (January)]] and [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - January - Wheels/Voting|'''Wheels''' (January)]]. Submit your entries for [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - February - Mailboxes|'''Mailboxes''' (February)]] and [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - February - Reflections|'''Reflections''' (February)]]

gotwaldová

smazat--Martin wolf (talk) 20:41, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Statistika návštěvnosti

Prosím Tě, mrkni na User talk:Podzemnik#Statistika návštěvnosti --PetrS. (talk) 11:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

UP

Ahoj, tohle je zde na commons běžné User:Daniel Holý CZ?--Horst (talk) 13:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

@User:Horst: To nevím, ale odkázal bych na Commons:User pages, zejména "User pages may contain other content about the user, but this [...] should not express hatred of or vilify others." --Mormegil (talk) 09:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Co se vám nezdá se mé UP? Nenahrávají snad lidé na Commons kradený materiál? Pakliže chcete vychovávat přispěvatele, tak se zaměřte na to, aby Vaše projekty někdo normálně podpořil. Potom si všichni uvědomí, že bez souhlasu majite copyrightu pod svobodnou licencí nic šířit nelze. @Horst, když uděláte chybu, tak se pak nesnažte ji zametat pod koberec, protože právě proto na Commons nikdo nepříspívá. Proč by to dělal, proč by nějaký archiv s vámi spolupracoval jenom proto, že vy to chcete. Dejte si od internetu na nějakou dobu pauzu, jděte do knihovny, přečtěte si nějakou knihu, časopis a uvidíte, že budete mnohem šťastnější. Psaní vyžaduje spolupráci, trpělivost, nic si nevynutíte. Čím více budete tlačit na pilu, tím více nepřátel budete mít. Budou vás nesnášet v knihovně, v muzeu. No a to je cesta do pekel. Jednoho dne se zaseknete, články na cs Wiki už nikdo nevylepší, zůstanou tak, jak jsou. No a existence vaše účtu zde už nic nevyřeší. Fascinuje mne, že ani po letech to na cs Wiki nechápete. Je na čase obrátit směr, teď to ještě jde. --Daniel Holý (talk) 15:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Žádnou spojitost mezi „[…] jsem velice agresivní, zejména, pokud se mne nějaký vůl snaží přesvědčit […]“, případně „Pohybují se tu všelijací psychopati […}“ a „User pages […] should not express hatred of or vilify others“ nevidíte? --Mormegil (talk) 15:48, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

A není to snad pravda, vůbec se zde nepohybují psychopati? Proč tedy běží banner "Obtěžovaní na projektech ....", vyjádřete se. Problém v onom obtěžovaní spočívá v tom, že ho správci nejsou schopni posoudit, když už to dělají povrchním způsobem. Nechcete se bavit o špíně, ale právě proto se pak nic nevyřeší. Teď někdo nahlas přiznal, že jsou připsvětelé na projektech soustavně obtěžováni psychopaty. Na Commons je ještě klid, ale na cs Wiki je psychopatů bůh ví, kolik :-D. Psychopat je člověk, který vnucuje svoji pravdu někomu jinému bez ohledu na to, že lže, hluboko uvnitř cítí, že lže. --Daniel Holý (talk) 09:04, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Tak jsem to vylepšil User:Daniel Holý CZ, zákaz pro UFO snad zakázán není :-D. --Daniel Holý (talk) 12:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Možnost hromadné editace

Dobrý den, chtěl bych se na vás obrátit jako na velmi zkušeného wikipedistu s prosbou o radu.

Pohybuji se většinou na Commons a pokouším se teď kromě jiného i vyčistit hlavní kategorie jako Chemie, Biologie a možná do budoucna i jiné od balastních obrázků, aby hlavní kategorie zůstavaly pokud možno prázdné (u chemie se mi to už docela podařilo). Přitom se často potkávám se skupinou většího množství obrázků od téhož autora, kdy by bylo vhodné hromadně, v celé té skupině, provést stejnou operacei - změna kategorie, odstranění katogorie... pro všechny najednou. Viz nyní Biologie, kde je několik desítek obrázků Correlation... od stejného autora (ten nemá vlastní stránku a nelze mu tedy napsat).

Nevíte tedy o možnosti, jak současně v těchto cca 30 obrázcích odstranit kategorii Biology najednou v jediné editaci? Nebo na to musí mít wikipedista nějaká zvláštní práva? Předem díky za odpověď, --Karelj (talk) 23:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

@Karelj: O žádná zvláštní práva nejde, jde jen o to, použít vhodné nástroje. Víceméně cokoli lze udělat pomocí univerzálních botů (které může provozovat kdokoli, ale je technicky složitější je rozchodit), na specifické konkrétní úlohy ale existují i jednodušší nástroje, k tomuto konkrétnímu problému vizte například Help:Gadget-Cat-a-lot. --Mormegil (talk) 08:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Díky za radu, vážený kolego, po chvíli experimentování a zmatků se mi bota podařilo zprovoznit a je to paráda... --Karelj (talk) 14:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Obrázek antény City Empiria

Ahoj, mohl bys pls pořešit toto? Vkladatel uvádí, že povoluje užití ale nahrál to sem kdysi někdo jiný. Dík moc, mám minimum času--Horst (talk) 13:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Není třeba, autor zmatený. Jeho výřez zde neodpovídá Pastoriově fotce zde. Vyřeším to s ním v příslušné odkazované diskusi. --Pán hor (talk) 16:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Obávám se, že zmatený jste zejména vy. Pan Harvánek opravdu nesrovnává fotku „detail vrcholu antény vysílače“ s fotkou celého Motokovu, ale s File:Anténa City Empiria.png, která je v článku vložena jen o něco níže, než kam jste se podíval. Váš příspěvek jsem z diskuse odstranil, aby nemátl. Zkusím to vyřešit. --Mormegil (talk) 16:14, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Enjoy! ;-) Jsou přímo od Dvanácti měsíčků ...for your Sep 2010 Rejzek (Non-)Copyvio explanations and convincing argumentation on your Talk page of en.wikt. Megoutkař Alou (talk) 11:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Images_from_journals

Images from journals has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

105.150.40.250 15:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear {{subst:PAGENAME}}. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you--B dash (talk) 08:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

WikidataIB

Hi. I just saw your edit at [1]. There's a new version of that module at Module:WikidataIB/sandbox that's just about to be deployed, you might want to make your changes there as well (and coordinate them with @RexxS: . Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for that improvement to Module:WikidataIB. As a property which has datatype monolingual text can have multiple values (for different languages), the sandbox version check for a value whose language matches the content language of the wiki. I probably should change that to look for the user's language preference because the module is used on multilingual wikis like Commons. Have a look at the sandbox version lines 794 to 803 for the current code. I'm going to borrow your idea of reporting the datatype and incorporate it into the sandbox, which will now replace the main module. Thanks again, and please feel free to experiment with Module:WikidataIB/sandbox. We still need handlers for several of the datatypes described at d:Help:Data type. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 19:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Mormegil. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2018 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you. – Kwj2772 (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

File:MediaWiki logo.png

File:MediaWiki logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

49.146.178.117 09:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Konference - Média a moc - 2.3.2017 - Václav Klaus ml.png

File:Konference - Média a moc - 2.3.2017 - Václav Klaus ml.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Image is a screenshot of a video not created by the uploader Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Trivialist (talk) 23:59, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Szentgyörgyi Albert és a svéd király.jpg

"A szerző halálát követően eltelt 70 év, vagy szerzője ismeretlen és a dokumentum első nyilvánosságra hozatala óta eltelt 70 év, ill. a mű nem tartozik szerzői jogi védelem alá. A közkincsnek jelölt dokumentumokat nem védi a szerzői jog, tehát bárki által felhasználhatóak, másolhatóak, módosíthatóak. Amint a védelmi időszak lejár, a művek automatikusan átkerülnek Public Domain vagyis közkincs kategóriába. Ezután nem lehet kizárólagos ellenőrzést gyakorolni a közkincs kategóriájú művek felett, és nem lehet kizárólagos jogokat követelni a már közkinccsé vált művek visszaállításával, ha azokat reprodukálják, vagy technikai és/vagy szerződéses intézkedésekkel korlátozzák a hozzáférést azok reprodukcióihoz." (70 years after the death of the author or unknown author and 70 years after the first publication of a document, copyright protection signature. Documents marked as public domain are not signed for copyright, so anyone can use, copy, or modify. As soon as the term of protection expires, the works will automatically be transferred to the Public Domain or Public Service category. The friendly friendly practice should then be performed over a public domain category of works and should not be transposed when technical modifications are required, ie devices that meet technical and / or use needs.) [2] 12akd (talk) 10:35, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Time ago/core/cs

Hi! I’ve just switched Template:Time ago/core/cs to use the Translate extension. While making the switch, I changed the {{Plural}} call to use the translation’s language, but this unfortunately broke the Czech translations referring to the past, as now {{Plural}} expects three word forms instead of the two used in English. Could you please fix it? Thanks in advance, —Tacsipacsi (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks. --Mormegil (talk) 13:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

/cs

/cs has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leonel Небојша Sohns 17:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!

Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Rychlé smazání

Ahoj, tady ses vyjádřil pro rychlé smazání, kolega @ŠJů: Tě následoval - znamená to pro mě, abych změnil šablonu klasického smazání u jednotlivých obrázků na rychlé smazání, nebo jde z vaší strany prostě o vyjádření souhlasu a pokus o urgenci mazačům? Nikdy jsem to ještě nedělal, tak nevím, jak přesně postupovat... --GeXeS (talk) 08:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Spíš by to měly být naše názory pro toho, kdo by případně žádost vyhodnocoval. Každopádně ten správce, který by rozhodoval o rychlém smazání, by tam měl mít dostupný odkaz na tu proběhlou diskusi, a také by ji měl uzavřít, čili šablonu DoSu neodstraňovat. Uvažoval jsem, že bych dal echo na nástěnku správců, ale u ofenzivních fotek narušujících soukromí je kontraproduktivní na ně upozorňovat a správně by se na ně mělo upozorňovat diskrétně e-mailem (kdyby šlo např. o vyloženě protizákonný obsah). Ale tohle mi zase nepřipadalo až tak nebezpečné ani urgentní, takže se mi zdálo postačující nechat to v režimu DoSu s tím, že by to tam někoho mělo trknout, aby se tomu věnoval přednostně. Ale pokud bys to chtěl urychlit, tak bys mohl na ty stránky přidat šablonu {{Speedy}}, kde bys za svislítko uvedl důvod smazání (offensive, out of scope) a odkaz na tu diskusi o smazání. --ŠJů (talk) 09:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Abeceda z roku 1924 a iniciály.png

File:Abeceda z roku 1924 a iniciály.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Wikidata nodes in white (cs).svg

File:Wikidata nodes in white (cs).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Waldyrious (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Question about image

Hello, you uploaded this image File:Reskript Josefa I.gif and I was wondering if you knew which signature is Joseph’s? I’m thinking it’s the one closest to the text you can see it starts with a J. I look forward to hearing back from you. Robertus Pius (talk) 18:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I think so. A transcription of the image is at s:cs:Reskript císaře Josefa I. českým stavům, the other signatures being Venceslaus Norbertus Kinský, J.W.Wratislav (I think?), and von Schwalbenfeld. --Mormegil (talk) 19:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Awesome! I’ll crop Joseph’s signature and put it in his article, thanks. Robertus Pius (talk) 19:51, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bust of Konstantin Chernenko at Kremlin Wall Necropolis (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, Komarof (talk) 13:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)